Applying the same adjustments to measures of gains in
NAEP scores over time also brought a different crop of states to the top of the list, highlighting gains in scores in Nevada, Maryland, and Hawaii, with Massachusetts and New Jersey remaining near the top as well.3 The variation in relative student achievement among states highlighted by this analysis demonstrates the caution necessary when interpreting state - level NAEP.
Not exact matches
For example, Krueger (1998) uses data from the
NAEP and documents test
score increases
over time, with large improvements for disadvantaged children from poor urban areas; the Current Population Survey shows declining dropout rates since 1975 for those from the lowest income quartile (Digest of Education Statistics, NCES 2012).
The improvement in the median reading
score for those students entering 3rd grade is smaller than the
NAEP increase for 4th graders
over the same
time period.
The Urban Institute's new report, Breaking the Curve: Promises and Pitfalls of Using
NAEP Data to Assess the State Role in Student Achievement, proposes better ways to compare
NAEP scores across states and
over time.
The conclusion is that improvements on the state - based tests reflect «
score inflation», with
NAEP providing the more accurate indication of trends
over time.
Similarly, Russ Whitehurst and Michelle Croft have shown that the quality of state standards (as assessed by third party organizations) is unrelated to
NAEP scores, a finding confirmed by the Harvard Kennedy School's Josh Goodman in an analysis that examined the effects of changes in the quality of standards within states
over time.
And to see how the percent of students
scoring proficient or above on
NAEP in D.C. has changed
over time, click here.
I would further resign myself to concluding that 17 - year - olds across all three major racial sub-groups have shown little to no improvement in terms of
NAEP scores over the last 30 + years, which suggests that public high schools are not doing a more effective job with a student population that has,
over time, come to school less - prepared to be academically successful.
Additionally, reports are released examining how
NAEP results have changed
over time using scale
scores and achievement levels (Basic, Proficient, and Advanced).
Charter students in Arizona achieved these increases in
NAEP scale
scores even while the nation as a whole experienced little or no growth
over that same 2009 to 2017
time period.
On Tuesday, the same day
NAEP results went public, the Louisiana Department of Education announced (hat tip to the comms folks at LDOE on the
timing) that the Class of 2017 was the first in state's history to have more than 50 percent of students qualify for the TOPS college scholarship program, thanks to the steady rise in ACT
scores over the past six years.
While
NAEP scores are widely cited,
score changes
over time can be a reflection of trends outside the classroom, such as changing demographics, attrition, measurement error and changes in circumstances, including the effects of the recession.