Sentences with phrase «nih research grant applications»

While 33 percent of NIH research grant applications were funded in 1970, that number dropped to 20 percent by 2016 (NIH Report).

Not exact matches

AHRQ shares the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant application and review processes, including those for research studies (e.g. R01, R03), training (K - series), and small business.

The Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, for example, received more than four times its usual number of applications owing to cuts in NIH spending on breast cancer research, according to Paula Witt - Enderby, a researcher at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh and a member of the charity's grant review panel.

To test this, we used data from the NIH IMPAC II (Information for Management, Planning, Analysis, and Coordination) grants data system consisting of application and investigator data for Research Project Grants (RPGs) submitted between FY 2000 and FY 2006 (grants data system consisting of application and investigator data for Research Project Grants (RPGs) submitted between FY 2000 and FY 2006 (Grants (RPGs) submitted between FY 2000 and FY 2006 (5, 6).

T. A. Kotchen et al, «NIH Peer Review of Grant Applications for Clinical Research.»

With respect to research funding, Sutton and Killian found that applications for NIH research grants submitted by MSTP graduates were often classified as «laboratory research» much like proposals from applicants who had received only the PhD degree.9 These data indicate that MSTP graduates are not filling the role initially intended for them.

Applications from Asian, black, Hispanic, and Native American investigators together are 21 % of the total for NIH research grant opportunities and are represented in similar proportion both to medical school faculty and biomedical Ph.D. matriculants (9).

NIH has established a central informational resource center for grant applications called the Electronic Research Administration (ERA) Commons.

If you have submitted grant applications before, as a researcher or research administrator, you no doubt recognize that getting ready for these new processes will require significant changes by both NIH and research institutions.

Applications will be reviewed by subject matter experts at NIH and other health agencies to see if «they show a reasonable potential to meet the statutory goals,» says NIH's Jo Anne Goodnight, who oversees NIH's small - business research grants.

NIH has an active pilot program, the NIH electronic research administration (ERA) initiative, in which it will soon encourages applicants to submit certain types of applications — renewals and training grant applications — online.

Last fiscal year, NSF — like NIH — funded about 1 in 5 research grant applications, according to the agency's most recent budget submission.

The application procedure is similar to an NIH grant application, with applicants expected to provide a statement of career and research interests, letters of recommendation, and evidence of research support and the ability to complete the proposed research.

A lower court's 23 August preliminary injunction halting hESC research «has a profound impact» that «disrupts not only the processing of grant applications currently under review by NIH, but it disrupts many of its currently funded grants, and it has already threatened ongoing programs to educate physicians and physician - researchers,» the brief states.

A team of «seasoned» scientific reviewers and scientists provide grant - writing tips based on the PHS 398 application, the application form used for most NIH grants, including R01 research grants, fellowships, and career training grants.

BETHESDA, Md., Thurs., Oct. 14, 2004 - The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), today announced it has awarded more than $ 38 million in grants to spur the development of innovative technologies designed to dramatically reduce the cost of DNA sequencing, a move aimed at broadening the applications of genomic information in medical research and healResearch Institute (NHGRI), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), today announced it has awarded more than $ 38 million in grants to spur the development of innovative technologies designed to dramatically reduce the cost of DNA sequencing, a move aimed at broadening the applications of genomic information in medical research and healresearch and health care.

Since 1946, the CSR mission has remained clear and timely: to see that NIH grant applications receive fair, independent, expert, and timely reviews — free from inappropriate influences — so NIH can fund the most promising research.

CSR organizes the peer review groups or study sections that evaluate the majority (70 %) of the research grant applications sent to NIH.

In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director of NIH, impaneled a group of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented rresearch community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented rResearch Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented rresearch, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented researchresearch.

As you may know, the lion's share of medical research funding in the U.S.A. comes from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is a government organization that reviews grant applications from scientists around the country and around the world and provides research funding for the best of those projects.

Although earlier reports emphasize that the percentage of NIH extramural grant dollars devoted to clinical research depends on the inclusiveness of the definition of clinical research, 5,14,18,29 the primary purpose of the current analysis was to describe outcomes of the scientific review of grant applications rather than to provide a comprehensive overview of extramural NIH funding for clinical research.

Nevertheless, there is a continuing perception among clinical investigators that the NIH peer review process may discriminate against clinical research.11 The purpose of this analysis was to describe recent trends and outcomes of peer review for grant applications requesting support for clinical research.

All Fellows are required to submit an NIH grant application, submit at least one manuscript for publication for each year of training and present their research at national conferences.

«We do not support the inclusion of preprints or interim research products in NIH grant applications...