Sentences with phrase «no proof of anything»
Because neither of these allegations resulted in criminal charges, much less convictions, they're not proof of anything.
https://www.vox.com/
I am not sure that what happened last week is proof of anything I've been saying, but I do think that the framework I have used over the past decade has been useful, at least to me, in understanding both the rebalancing process in China and the events that led up to the global crisis of 2007 - 08.
Belief, no matter how strong, is not proof of anything.
No proof of anything after death at all.
The story of a resuurection is not proof of anything, as the story you've been told since birth was NOT recorded by anyone who was there, rather it was FINALLY written down 2 generations after the so - called «fact».
Why is there zero proof of anything supernatural ever occurring on earth?
The BVG Theorem doesn't even attempt that, so why would we think you would have proof of anything more?
Books written by believers are not proof of anything.
So right off the bat, these are weak statements, much less proofs of anything.
Why do you continue to act like the bible is proof of anything?
Kind of sad that you think how long it's lasted is proof of anything.
The bible isn't proof of anything more than the fact that man is a good story teller.
Religious text are not proof of anything.
As if it was proof of anything other than an individuals belief.
The events of a fairy tale are not proof of anything, and the fact that people are willing to die for their silly beliefs only demonstrates how easily some people are fooled in to believing nonsense.
«matt — just because we can use science and reason to explain natural events doesn't mean there isn't a god, case in point, rainbows, a sign given by god to Noah can be explained by science but is still a promise made by god» But thats not proof of anything.
It's a huge waste of time, they call the bible truth, the never have any proof of anything (how can they) it's the same rebuttal, you have to have faith, or Free Will and they only get more silly from there.
============ @Bryant Lister» The events of a fairy tale are not proof of anything, and the fact that people are willing to die for their silly beliefs only demonstrates how easily some people are fooled in to believing nonsense.
It may not be scientific proof of anything, but it is proof of something of meaning, of psychologicaly use, to that individual.
Therefore Tacitus is NO proof of anything.
Quoting the bible is not proof of anything.
One day we find a fragment of unknown quality, origin, and intent that was written in Egypt 20 generations after Jesus» life and this is somehow historic proof of anything?
They are far from proof of anything.
You said, «But there can be proof of God just like there can be proof of anything.»
And no, a narrative in a 1500 - year old collection of short stories is not considered scientific evidence or proof of anything, no matter how many people believe it.
@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.
While it is true that very suggestive metaphysical arguments can be drawn from the reality of form, the intelligibility of the universe, consciousness, the laws of physics, or (most importantly) ontological contingency, the mere biological complexity of this or that organism can never amount to an irrefutable proof of anything other than the incalculable complexity of that organism's phylogenic antecedents.
Love is not proof of anything but that you feel it.
Emotions are not proof of anything but that you feel emotions.
The bible is not proof of anything, I've read Greek Myths as well it does not mean Zeus exsists.
It is not proof of anything.
Unless you think that the guy in the bible and the guy on facebook are the same person, the name doesn't provide proof of anything.
Given current lack of evidence for proof of anything supernatural, will there be leniency for those who simply and honestly claim, «I don't know», granted there is a supernatural, and that the Christian God is the true God who did present us with an ultimatum to accept him or not, expecting us to wage the eternal fate of our soul?
Freethinker, you are just upset that you have zero proof of anything you say other than a book that spends the first half scaring the s ** t out of everyone, and then the second half changing its message.
As far as Jesus» followers facing death and punishment for being outspoken — 100 % certainty is no proof of anything.
Will, The bible and extracts from it on buildings is not proof of anything in the bible; apart from places and a few people very little of the bible has been proven correct and much of the foundation is proven incorrect.
Oh, you think posting crap from fundie sites and nut - case sources like World Nut Daily is proof of anything?
if you base your life on nothing but a thought (faith)-- a dream — really its more of a hope because the only «proof» is after you die — so there really isn't any proof of anything but a load of people telling others they are wrong and going to a place of torture because THEY think its real or vice versa!
Emotion is not proof of anything, so don't bother bringing it up again.
Unless they are having delusions and not wanting proof of anything but only believe what other people tell them.
Everything is not real and there is no proof of anything.
You do reaalize of course that NOTHING in the bible has been been proven and therefore it is NOT proof of anything?!?!?! Or is your delusion complete?
While THIS writing doesn't provide proof of ANYTHING....
Doug's ignorance is NOT proof of anything....
You said, «Doug's ignorance is NOT proof of anything....
When we studied some of these reports, we found an amazing number of weasel words but no real proof of anything.
The spiking walk rate is worrisome, but it doesn't have to be proof of anything.
Its all very secretive and you still have not shown any proof of anything Not sure why you are therefore saying anything until you know for sure... eg Lemar deal then Monaco backed out after you said was happening two weeks ago... that would seem they do nt know everything
Scientific rigour and the most robust research can not ensure the proof of anything.
I would not expect there to be absolute beyond - the - shadow - of - a-doubt proof of anything any time soon, short of Russia admitting it.