Sentences with phrase «noaa ncdc»

Annual average GCR counts per minute (blue - note that numbers decrease going up the left vertical axis, because lower GCRs should mean higher temperatures) from the Neutron Monitor Database vs. annual average global surface temperature (red, right vertical axis) from NOAA NCDC, both with second order polynomial fits.

Average of NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4 monthly global surface temperature anomalies from January 1970 through November 2012 (green) with linear trends applied to the timeframes Jan ’70 — Oct» 77, Apr ’77 — Dec» 86, Sep ’87 — Nov» 96, Jun ’97 — Dec» 02, and Nov ’02 — Nov» 12.

Average of NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4 monthly global surface temperature anomalies from January 1970 through November 2012 (green) with linear trends applied to the timeframes Jan»70 - Oct» 77, Apr»77 - Dec» 86, Sep»87 - Nov» 96, Jun»97 - Dec» 02, and Nov»02 - Nov» 12.

He compares Cowtan and Way's temperature series with GISS and NOAA NCDC as well as HadCRUT4.

(Data from CMIP3, CMIP5, and NOAA NCDC).

(Figure source: NOAA NCDC / CICS - NC).

http://www.skepticalscience.com/graphics.php?g=47 The data (green) are the average of the NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4 monthly global surface temperature anomaly datasets from January 1970 through November 2012, with linear trends for the short time periods Jan 1970 to Oct 1977, Apr 1977 to Dec 1986, Sep 1987 to Nov 1996, Jun 1997 to Dec 2002, and Nov 2002 to Nov 2012 (blue), and also showing the far more reliable linear trend for the full time period (red

Figure 1: Short - term cooling trends from Jan»70 to Nov» 77, Nov»77 to Nov» 86, Sep»87 to Nov» 96, Mar»97 to Oct» 02, and Oct»02 to Dec»11 (blue) vs. the 42 - year warming trend (Jan»70 to Dec» 11; red) using NOAA NCDC land - ocean data.

A global version of the Escalator graphic has therefore been prepared using the NOAA NCDC global (land and ocean combined) data through December 2011 (Figure 1).

Figure 2: The data (green) are the average of the NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4 monthly global surface temperature anomaly datasets from January 1970 through November 2012, with linear trends for the short time periods Jan 1970 to Oct 1977, Apr 1977 to Dec 1986, Sep 1987 to Nov 1996, Jun 1997 to Dec 2002, and Nov 2002 to Nov 2012 (blue), and also showing the far more reliable linear trend for the full time period (red).

Image from NOAA NCDC / CICS - NC's Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, page 374.

Dataset was originally produced at NOAA's National Center for Atmospheric Prediction (NCEP) and is available in it's original grib format through NOAA NCDC's access page and from NCAR.

Taken from NOAA NCDC's Paleo Slide Set: The Ice Ages.

Figure 7: IPCC TAR model projection for emissions Scenario A2 (blue) vs. observed surface temperature changes (average of NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4; red) for 1990 through 2012.

Days with temperatures over 100 degrees during 2011 (NOAA NCDC)

Observed U.S. temperature change from 1991 - 2012 compared to 1901 - 1960 average (195 - 1980 for Alaska and Hawaiit)(NOAA NCDC / CICS - NC)

Figure 1: IPCC temperature projections (red, pink, orange, green) and contrarian projections (blue and purple) vs. observed surface temperature changes (average of NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4; black and red) for 1990 through 2012.

In 1956, the average global surface temperature anomaly in the three datasets (NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4) was -0.21 °C.

Figure 9: IPCC AR4 multi-model projection for emissions Scenario A2 (blue) vs. observed surface temperature changes (average of NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4; red) for 2000 through 2012.

(Data from NOAA NCDC).

NASA GISS may have pulled their release off - line, but NOAA NCDC has a release available... http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2005/s2548.htm

NASA GISS and NOAA NCDC plainly publicised that 2014 was «hottest year» when it wasn't.

# 106 Pat: thanks for the reference to NOAA NCDC.

Chris, 2008 monthly S.H. temperature averages by NOAA NCDC are unlike the S.H. averages by NASA but are like the averages you show at your links.

Last Friday, NASA GISS and NOAA NCDC had a press conference and jointly announced the end - of - year analysis for the 2014 global surface temperature anomaly which, in both analyses, came out top.

Figure 2: The data (green) are the average of the NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4 monthly global surface temperature anomaly datasets from January 1970 through November 2012, with linear trends for the short time periods Jan 1970 to Oct 1977, Apr 1977 to Dec 1986, Sep 1987 to Nov 1996, Jun 1997 to Dec 2002, and Nov 2002 to Nov 2012 (blue), and also showing the far more reliable linear trend for the full time period (red).

Annual average GCR counts per minute (blue - note that numbers decrease going up the left vertical axis, because lower GCRs should mean higher temperatures) from the Neutron Monitor Database vs. annual average global surface temperature (red, right vertical axis) from NOAA NCDC, both with second order polynomial fits.

Not exact matches

In a new paper in Science Express, Karl et al. describe the impacts of two significant updates to the NOAA NCEI (née NCDC) global temperature series.

The CycloneCenter project is a collaboration between the Citizen Science Alliance, NOAA National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), University of North Carolina at Asheville, and the Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites (CICS)-- North Carolina.

Based on my «climate - geek» analysis of the temperature records, the GISS (NASA) and NCDC (NOAA) records appear to be much higher quality than the HadCrut records.

In typed letter on 9/22/09 Tom Karl wrote: «We at NOAA / NCDC seek a way forward to cooperate with you, and are interested in joint scientific inquiry.

NCDC uses data from one of the largest volunteer organization in the world, the NOAA Cooperative Observer Network.

Why isn't the NOAA / NCDC analyzing it, too?

I could not find any answer, but I am extremely interested in any answer, particularly if it could include the data from NCDC / NOAA.

Here are the January NCDC / NOAA LAND GLOBAL MONTHLY ANOMALIES.

For those bloggers who like to check the numbers for themselves, the above web page gives the GLOBAL MONTHLY LAND TEMPERATURE ANOMALIES per NCDC / NOAA.

NOAA, NCDC, and USHCN are all governmental agencies.

Further, I can find no references to version 3 via Google, or at CDIAC, NOAA, or NCDC.

Examining NCDC global temperature anomalies versus NOAA GHG index demonstrates that the period since 2001 is not exceptional in terms of the longer trend.

If the temp anomalies continue to unravel, then the credibility of the NCDC / NOAA will be damaged for decades to come.

Should NCDC and NOAA simply switch to Autodesk's Green Building Studio subscription for all their weather needs??

That will empower the Issa and Inhofe and like minded members to investigate the NOAA, NCDC and NASA et al concerning the false data and scientific malpractice.

The Carbon Dioxide Research Program of the U. S. Department of Energy and the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) established a network of 1219 stations in the contiguous United States for the specific purpose of compiling a data set suitable for detecting and monitoring climate change over the past two centuries.

Another question or two: Anthony and Steve, after the many temp sites shown to be fraudulent, at this web site and others, has anyone, be it NOAA, USHCN, NCDC or any other «official» entity corrected the errors?

If you have the URL for the NCDC / NOAA data, and I am wrong, I would be grateful for the URL.

And according to the latest NOAA - NCDC data, during that same 15 - year time period, U.S. temperatures were actually on a cooling trend - to the tune of a minus 1.9 F degrees per century.

First, the NCDC / NOAA data set did NOT say 2010 was higher than 1998.

Identify from the 1980 - 1990's a single NOAA / NCDC / NASA climate expert on the taxpayer dole, at that time, who publicly stated this was a likely result.

As this NOAA / NCDC regional climate map reveals, the vast majority of the continental U.S. has not warmed for the last 15 calendar years.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA's) National Climate Data Center (NCDC) recently declared 2012 to be the hottest year on record for the contiguous United States.