I am open minded when it comes to «real truth» but real truth requires real evidence of which there is
none for a god.
There's empirical evidence that supports the existence of oxygen, atoms, neurons, gravity, etc., but
none for God.
Not exact matches
«Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his
God, that he owes account to
none other
for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.»
Whether someone wishes to believe that
God orchestrates the process of evolution, or that
God provided the divine spark from which life on Earth first sprung 3.5 billion years ago, or that «Let There Be Light» is a metaphor
for the Big Bang, is really
none of my concern.
Gary, when are you going to learn, no man can represent
God, Only His Spirit can represent Himself in and through man, Jesus ascended to be with our Father, then He sent down His Holy Spirit
for them that Father gave to Him: I do not represent
GOD, it is His Spirit in and through man that represents Himself, To
GOD be all the GLORY: Man get's
none!!!
None of us athiests care
for one second that you believe in a
god.
Yet all have since been explained, and
none are evidence
for God.
There is ample evidence
for the existence of
God, what you decide to do with this evidence is ultimately up to you, but do not claim that there is
none... and I would submit to you that many people believe many things without evidence every single day... but do not lump all people of faith into one basket... I have personal proof that
God exists, but proof
for me may not be proof
for you, some people can see something with their own eyes and still deny it, that is why I said it is ultimately up to you to decide what you believe... there is much evidence both
for and against the existence of
God, you need to decide which evidence you choose to believe...
«Remember the former things of old:
for I am
God, and there is
none else; I am
God, and there is
none like me, Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:» (Isaiah 46:9 - 10)
None of this changed Paul
for or against loving
God, but did put more weight on the «love
God» side.
None of this is true
for gods.
None of the so - called savior -
gods died
for someone else, in their place (subst - i - t - ution).
@All most of the post by the
none relegious on this blog show disdain
for believers and confuse the church
for God.
Wake up!!!!
None of
God's other creatures never needed priests or collection plates
for the entire history of the bible.
You ask
for proof of
God, darknesscrown, and believe there is
none because you say that man can not prove His existence.
Or,
for about 0.0000001 % probability, there is a
god or two, but
none that are actually taking any interest in anyone on earth.
there are logical explanations
for everything that happens in this world -
none of it requires a
god or magic.
We all are deserving of
God's wrath,
for there is
none righteous, no not one says the word of
God.
A
God who could make good children as easily as bad, yet preferred to make bad ones; who could have made every one of them happy, yet never made a single happy one; who made them prize their bitter life, yet stingily cut it short; who gave his angels eternal happiness unearned, yet required his other children to earn it; who gave his angels painless lives, yet cursed his other children with biting miseries and maladies of mind and body; who mouths justice, and invented hell - mouths mercy, and invented hell - mouths Golden Rules and forgiveness multiplied by seventy times seven, and invented hell; who mouths morals to other people, and has
none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, then tries to shuffle the responsibility
for man's acts upon man, instead of honorably placing it where it belongs, upon himself; and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites his poor abused slave to worship him!
«
None is righteous, no, not one; 11 no one understands; no one seeks
for God.
When so many people with different versions of
God (s) claim a monopoly of truth
for their interpretation exclusive of all the others, the logical conclusion is that
none of them are right.
The point is that Christians need so many answers,
none of which is supported by any evidence at all, whereas the atheist only needs one answer
for all of them: There is no
God.
I am going to go with the latter because having a creator - parent like that is just too much to bear... there is no reason
for all of this if there is a
god,
none.
Your
god sets forth many reasons
for which it wouldn't accept people in to heaven and the gullible believers do their best to keep the ancient fairy tales alive - creating divisions where
none should be had.
Unfortunately
for you, not only is there absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support any of these claims, the existence of any such
God leads to numerous questions and apparent inconsistencies
for which
none of you can provide convincing answers.
If I've said it once, I've said it 100 times... either
God exists or it doesn't and until it shows itself to us in this waking life
NONE of us will know
for sure.
None of it's true, but many Christians need to believe it so they can believe
God is blessing them with good things reserved only
for those who believe in him.
Even if the Exodus account laid all the responsibility
for the hardening of Pharaoh's heart upon
God Himself, and
none upon Pharaoh, this still would tell us nothing about whether or not Pharaoh concluded His life as one of
God's redeemed.
You say most Christians,
none sounds better considering there is no evidence outside of the bible
for the garden of eden or any
god.
She also speaks directly to
God at will AND receives direct specific responses...
none of which have yet been a cure
for cancer coincidentally.
I think there are several hypotheses
for a natural origin of religion / spirituality, but
none seem to lead to a
god.
Chad, Chuckles, the many faces of UrLost / TheCapitalist, the many faces of HeavenSent, the many faces of bubbles... it's like we have the all - star team of froth - mouth
god - howlers with us here today, and
none of then took their Lithium or Thorazine or Xanax or Valium
for a few days now and are really getting out there in the crash withdrawal!
I see al lot of claims of evidence
for god, but yet
none is provided.
If the story of Jonah should not be a fact, even if Jonah had never lived, still would the profound truth of this narrative, the love of
God for Nineveh and the so - called heathen, be
none the less precious in the eyes of all those who love their fellow men.
Consequently, if it is not possible
for him, psychologically to surround each being with that particular, overflowing affection which characterizes our human love, at least he can nurture in his heart that generalized but
none the less real affection
for all that is which will cause him to cherish in each thing, over and above its surface qualities, the being itself — that is to say, that indefinable, elect part of each thing which, under
God's influence, gradually becomes flesh of his flesh.
The combined efforts of all the worlds religions have spent a lot of time looking
for proof of their
gods,
none of them hav efound anything yet, that's rather telling.
none of these prayers are dangerous,
for example if you pray to become like jesus, and
god downgrades your life and you lose your house and car etc, this is good, as God is happier with those who don't value the material things in this temporary world, and your only going to achieve heaven with Gods happin
god downgrades your life and you lose your house and car etc, this is good, as
God is happier with those who don't value the material things in this temporary world, and your only going to achieve heaven with Gods happin
God is happier with those who don't value the material things in this temporary world, and your only going to achieve heaven with
Gods happiness
With malice toward
none, with charity
for all, with firmness in the right as
God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care
for him who shall have borne the battle and
for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and a lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.
The answer is given and must be given by
God himself, in his own word in Jesus Christ,
for no one can answer this question except
God himself, in his self - revelation in history, since
none can speak the truth except
God.11
You can believe all of those things about Jesus and
God, which are good things to believe, but if you don't believe in Jesus
for eternal life,
none of it matters.
What I find interesting is that no woman has been there
for over 1000 years and still
none are allowed but the second name isT he Garden of the Mother of
God....
NONE of you have proof of «
God's» existance... a made up fairy tale created by people who lived over 2,000 years ago as a way to explain the universe and apply a general set of laws... yeah, it was great
for the time... i guess... but there is no place
for religion in today's societies.
The biblical justification
for the doctrine is sometimes found in Matthew 28:19; 1 Peter 1:2 and Isaiah 6:3, but
none of these passages speak of a
God who is eternally three in one.
Fourth,
none of these beliefs leaves space
for the possibility that the object of theology,
God, can overcome human subjectivity or bias.
When opposing voices claiming to speak
for God are recruited to partisan purpose, it reinforces the suspicion that
none of them speaks
for God, which is a sound suspicion to reinforce.
None of those things are evidence
for the existence of
God.
How about this...
god is a figment of your imagination and you are inventing your own «evidence»
for god of which there is
NONE.
Hence
for one to declare there is no
god is one to declare «there is
none greater than myself.»
By contrast, since what makes the statement «I exist» true is a wholly contingent state of affairs, it is in fact falsifiable, even though I myself could never falsify it, insofar as
none of the other statements that would have to be true in order
for it to be true would be an unavoidable belief
for God or a statement that would necessarily apply through his experiences.
I may not be a perfect Christian as
none of us are as we all sin however when you mock
God and the teachings of the Bible I can not vote
for someone like that.