Sentences with phrase «not accumulating heat»

Oceans are cooling «Ocean heat touches on the very core of the AGW hypothesis: When all is said and done, if the climate system is not accumulating heat, the hypothesis is invalid.

The troposphere doesn't exhibit a hot spot, the stratosphere isn't cooling, the oceans are not accumulating heat, the warming has been 40 % of that expected, and the models are inching close to falsification.

Oceans are cooling «Ocean heat touches on the very core of the AGW hypothesis: When all is said and done, if the climate system is not accumulating heat, the hypothesis is invalid.

«Also, if the atmosphere isn't accumulating heat at the rate forecast by the models, then the theoretical positive climate feedbacks which were expected to amplify the CO2 effect won't be as large,» McNider said.

«the Stratosphere can not accumulate any heat; to slow down cooling of the planet tomorrow — because: by tomorrow, the planet will be million miles away from that spot, spinning around the sun.»

Not exact matches

Oceanographers may have solved one of the biggest sea mysteries in years: why the upper ocean didn't warm between 2003 and 2010, even as heat - trapping greenhouse gases accumulated in the air above.

While the planet's surface didn't warm as fast, vast amounts of heat energy continued to accumulate in the oceans and with the switch in the PDO, some of this energy could now spill back into the atmosphere.

Is it when the leak is of such a large volume but not large enough that the engine just doesn't operate at all so at least the engine goes through enough combustion cycles to accumulate enough heat to drive an overheat scenario?

My question, if the El Nino does not deliver the punch anticipated or does not actually arrive this fall or winter, where does the accumulating ocean heat go?

If it trapped heat energy then it would not let it go and all the heat would have accumulated in it for billions of years.

I think I understand the analogy as it pertains to the actual Atlantic Meridional Overturning, but I can not follow how it explains what happens to the heat that accumulates as a result of AGW in, for example, the Sahara Desert, the Amazon Rain Forest, Antartica and Siberia.

In his State of the Union address to Congress last night, President Obama (no surprise) echoed the agencies» definitiveness on 2014's record heat, but wisely didn't dwell on that, making the point that the pattern is the key (along with the accumulating science pointing to specific rising risks):

It did not: the entire planet is accumulating heat due to an energy imbalance.

The fact that I can point to the majority of models not predicting this fast of a decline, and you can point out a few that say that it might have started by now and it hasn't, totally ignores the fact that either way, sea ice is diminishing and that is consistent with accumulating heat in the Earth's climate system.

But during the «Hiatus» periods, the top of the ocean doesn't accumulate nearly as much heat whereas the next lower levels accumulate more.

If the oceans weren't continuing to accumulate heat, sea levels would not be rising nearly as fast.

# 3: the planet hasn't accumulated enough» extra» heat for the last 150y,, to boil one chicken egg!!

The indirect solar part is the stored heat in the world ocean and land masses that does not cool off overnight, and hence «accumulates».

While the warming of average global surface temperatures has slowed (though not nearly as much as previously believed), the overall amount of heat accumulated by the global climate has not, with over 90 percent being absorbed by the oceans.

«It's not quite a runaway situation, but it does accelerate once it starts to thaw and accumulates heat.»

Another side effect of heat is that the normal solution of covering ones eyelashes with Vaseline did not stop coal dust accumulating there.

Ignorant hypothetical don't - know - much - science question: isn't there an important difference with Co2 - accumulated heat?

If less energy comes in, the governor will try to maintain the energy flux into the system (Willis's retarding the appearance of clouds) but once all stops have been pulled out (the sky is clear morning to night), then the engine slows down — slower air and water currents, less addition of heat to the polar areas, dissipation of what heat has accumulated by radiation into space and return cold water not getting the heating it formerly did.

LIA wasn't GLOBAL cooling; but colder in Europe, north America — because Arctic ocean had less ice cover - > was releasing more heat / was accumulating - > radiating + spreading more coldness — currents were taking that extra coldness to Mexican gulf — then to the Mediterranean — because Sahara was increasing creation of dry heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting more ice on arctic also as chain reaction — Because Mediterranean doesn't have enough tributaries, to compensate for the evaporation deficit.

You do have such an amazing molecule in your fictional world, defying gravity it can stay up in the atmosphere for hundreds and even thousands of years accumulating though it's one and a half times heavier than air, and, with no heat capacity to spit at, it can trap heat, or, heck you can't even get your stories to say the same thing consistently, it becomes this great thermal blanket stopping heat escaping... just how much of that blanket is holes?

What they do show is that without cloud cover the Earth cools more rapidly, hey, why isn't all the carbon dioxide accumulating in the atmosphere backradiating not only to delay that, but backradiating heat to the Earth as Spencer defends the fictional AGW energy budget?

Assuming for the sake of argument that «the pause» is not an instrument error and the troposphere hasn't gotten any warmer in 16 years then this raises the question of how ocean heat content could be rising which, according to ARGO, at least the upper half of the ocean is accumulating thermal energy.

This «heat» does not «accumulate», or get «stored».

Based on the trend in maximum temperatures, the region was not overheating nor accumulating heat.

There doesn't seem to be a reservoir of heat accumulating anywhere so if warming resumes it will probably be at the 1990s rate or less.

There are two; the first is that the oceans have not been accumulating heat since 2004.

It seems that we can explain this only if solar heat accumulates at the sea surface and doesn't get released to the atmosphere or transferred to greater depth.

Earth's climate system has not stopped accumulating energy over the past years, but ocean - atmosphere cycles (mainly a cool PDO) have slowed the rate of flow of latent and sensible heat from ocean to atmosphere.

John Christy: Since 1978, we've been able to monitor the bulk atmospheric temperature, which tells you whether heat has been accumulating or not.

There isn't enough heat capacity for heat to accumulate, so the only way to reach balance is through extra heat losses from the Earth (to exactly balance the forcing).

Even if AGW use the unsubstantiated claim that CO2 stays in the atmosphere accumulating for hundreds and even thousands of years, take your pick, they make up the numbers to suit, and double current amounts actually stayed in the atmosphere, this would be nonsense as «insulating blanket» to not only stop heat loss globally but raise the global temperature of the Earth.