Sentences with phrase «not damaging to the children»

It is NOT damaging to your child... what CAN BE is if you let lack of sleep pile on lack of sleep.

Like pornography and prostitutes, is «not damaging to the child».

Not exact matches

If you think these ideas are outdated or irrelevant, I suggest you take a look at the damage that has been wrought on society by rampant divorce, abortion, our of wedlock pregnancy, falling birth rates, and a general view that life is NOT sacred, family is NOT important, and that children are more a burden to be avoided than anything.

It does not take much effort to imagine the damage to a child whose parents are publicly struggling over her.

If you don't see that the RCC has given itself its own bad name then shame on your for turning a blind eye to all the damage they have done and all the children they have let down.

Misattunement is the opposite of that, and can be particularly damaging for children because kids typically don't have the language to say «you're not understanding what I feel.»

One somehow suspects that a 2013 Chinese law that requires children to visit their elderly parents regularly — a coercive attempt to repair some of the social damage caused by even worse coercion — is not going to do the trick.

8 With respect to those who refuse to accept Castilian sovereignty and the Christian faith the document includes this clause: «If you do not do it... with the help of God I will use all my power against you and will battle you everywhere and in every possible way, and you will be subject to the yoke and obedience of the Church and their Highnesses, and I will take your people and your women and children, and make them slaves, and as much I will send them, and I will inflict on you all the harm and damage possible.»

Unfortunately, they don't have the sense of autonomy that would lead them to refuse sex if their own life - chances (as well as those of their as - yet - unborn children) are in danger of being damaged by male reluctance to use the simple means of contraception readily available.

While recognizing that not every child suffers the gravest consequences of contact sports, we ought to question why we allow football to damage and even kill our children or dismiss the question because they're not our children.

The damage to children was not taken into account.

They speak of church cultures that treated women's bodies as inherently problematic and seductive, that assigned a woman's worth to her sexual purity or procreative prowess, that questioned women's ability to think rationally or make decisions without the leadership of men, that blamed victims of sexual abuse for inviting the abuse or tempting the abuser, that shamed women who did not «joyfully submit» to their husband and find contentment in their roles as helpers and homemakers, and that effectively silenced victims of abuse by telling women and children that reporting the crime would reflect poorly on the church and thus damage the reputation of Christ.

Pretending that gay marriage, with two committed adults raising children, is somehow going to damage the family unit is a fear that is not founded on any sort of reality.

lmao sure tell that the the hormone driven teens of the world... you can only have woopie if your going to marry, marriage will go through the roof... but so will divorce and lawyers will love that mentality because child custody battles make them loads of money and let's not forget the physcologist / phychiatrists that will make big money having to help all these emotionally damaged adults that were dragged through custody battles due to the fact their genetic donors procreated when it was the best time for them.

Just because you believe in a mythical creature does not mean you should be allowed to do permanent psychological damage to your children.

«I feel compelled to personally take on all the evil which some priests, quite a few in number, obviously not compared to the number of all the priests, to personally ask for forgiveness for the damage they have done for having sexually abused children,» the Pope said in remarks quoted by Vatican Radio.

Prove your god, heaven, hell, etc exist or shut your trap... only the mentally ill and children have imaginary friends, given that you're not likely a child you would be best advised to seek the local asylum and get medicated for your delusions before you cause damage to the world or better yet, take a leap of faith and then tell us if your imaginary friend exists you gullible fool!!

I don't think the benefits outweigh the damage that will be done to any child.

However, we would like to join the ranks of people, including the more than 6,000 supporters who have signed the petition to stop the destruction of field trials of GM crops, in calling for anti-GM activists and other concerned citizens to not take action that could delay the assessment and ongoing research of Golden Rice as a potential new way to reduce vitamin A deficiency and reduce the damage it can do to the precious vision and eyes of children.

Its either that or he pulls the old «its just a marketing thing where Im endangering children and setting public neuroscience awareness back decades in order to make a couple million extra dollars out of the pockets of suckers» defense, and I just do nt see how a humble classy guy like Wilson would ever cheapen his name by lending it to a bottle of snake oil that could wind up giving its purchasers real - world neurological damage if they were to use it in a manner consistent with what Wilson tells them.

this being said enough is enough this mockery of a manager needs to leave and that is right now, we were not winning this game, as much as I support our players especially Walcott he looked like a child against the CHELSHIT defense, it was a BENZEMA of sorts that could bullied and done some damage to this Bus........

You aren't going to damage your child by trying something for a few days.

While I do not think it is fair to extrapolate from one study of a Romanian orphanage where babies were neglected that an otherwise loving parent is «damaging» to a child, there are some things that are clear fact - based.

And to add to that, when a woman has tried her damndest to breastfeed, and it just did not work out, please be sure and tell her that she is NOT a bad mother and her child WILL be just fine and not damaged for linot work out, please be sure and tell her that she is NOT a bad mother and her child WILL be just fine and not damaged for liNOT a bad mother and her child WILL be just fine and not damaged for linot damaged for life.

We used CIO method and I not only disagree with your so called facts about future damage I have done to my child, I think the fact that you feel you can tell parents what they are doing is wrong is terrible!

Whether you choose to go back to full - time diapering and potty train at 18 months, or you choose to continue ECing and patiently resolve the potty pause and constipation, you will NOT damage your child if you:

Contrary to what most people may think, if installed properly, this child safety gate, will not only be easier to use, but will also cause less damage to your walls than pressure mounted gates would.

Co-sleeping won't necessarily help your toddler sleep better and in fact, could be damaging to your health and that of your child.

Typically men in their fifties and sixties, they hold jurassic attitudes to work and family life that are blighting the lives of millions of children, not to mention damaging the economy.

While I don't have a child who has homework yet — I think it's really damaging to do your kid's homework for them.

Perhaps because the damage inflicted in children who are subject to bullying, or to racial, religious, homo - or transphobic, or ethnic slurs or epithets or threats while participating in youth sports is not obvious, like sexual abuse, or immediately apparent, like a physical injury, its effect is often overlooked and minimized.

We are not only suffering because of it but our children are incurring the most damage due to social engineering.

The implication is, if you can't have the self control to eat well, buy the formula advertised on the same page as this add (and put money in the pockets of the people who indirectly supported the add), because otherwise you're just feeding your baby hamburgers and donuts, and that is simply NOT true and hurtfully misleading and potentially damaging to mothers (emotionally and in lost long term positive health benefits to breastfeeding moms) and the short and long term health of their children.

I will not conform to disgusting social norms that push children away too soon, that don't honor the feelings of child and adults equally and that suggest I'm damaging my child when the opposite has been proven time and time again.

But we know yelling is damaging to children and does not help the listen better.

Responding to children in anger can be more damaging than helpful - but anger doesn't have to be the enemy.

And how to give him and maintian the milk etc I think I was just not aware enough of the whole issue of nursing to dedicate myself to having it succeed, and to only give them MM and not let formula cross their lips, or of the damage to nursing supply of me giving a supplemental bottle of formula here and there, in the way that I did with the last 2 children.

It might be disconcerting to hear your toddler crashing cars into each other or ramming them into block buildings, but unless she's hurting another child, driving into your baseboards or damaging furniture, this is not behavior to discourage.

Her 2014 book, «Family Breakdown» received a great deal of criticism due to her claim that there was «undisputed evidence» that sleepovers with those not the child's primary caregiver, including divorced fathers, could cause emotional damage in comparisons to regular nuclear families.

I «m not sure when the conversation about the damage to the child being avoidable should take place.

For example, Linda Hatfield, an instructor at Parenting From The Heart in Southern California, suggests that time - outs and other punishments aren't just useless, but they are «damaging» to children.

Dr. Laura's biggest mistake is her notion that daycare centers are universally damaging to children and nannies can't meet their charges» needs.

What I needed most as a child was to learn how to handle losing in a way that didn't damage my self esteem.

I don't think the article referring to children getting brain damage from CIO is referring to children when it is done responsibly such as we did it.

But this guides clinicians in their decision making — it's not fair to ascribe any motive or intent towards your clinician's recommendations other than «I want to get this mother and child through this with the least amount of physiological and biological risk and damage».

Although you likely should avoid toys that sound loud, if your child gets any toys that make noise, be sure that he doesn't put them up to his ear, which can cause even more damage to his hearing.

I don't think they are inherently damaging to the child (but might be to a parent - child relationship) and I can see how in a classroom environment if one child is disrupting everything, you may need to remove them from the situation and the teacher can't drop everything else to sit with that child.

There is nothing inherently pathological about polyamorous families, and they are not destined to damage the children who grow up in them.

«Sponsorship of this kind thus damages the college's reputation as an independent advocate for child health; we can afford not to have the money, we can not afford the loss of reputation,» they said.

You don't want to risk damaging your developing child to alleviate some pain.