Sentences with phrase «not text changes»

These changes include imagery and design elements on the cover layout that are NOT text changes.

Not exact matches

Don't you dare think about opening Text Edit to convert to plain text, or try to change the font manuaText Edit to convert to plain text, or try to change the font manuatext, or try to change the font manually.

Not only should you change your passwords at least every 90 days, you should never share password information with anyone (such as a spouse) by email or text, only in person or over the phone.

«We do not believe that the outlook and balance of risks warrants a position of no policy change, nor a position of rapid easings,» said Reserve Bank of New Zealand Governor Graeme Wheeler in a speech to businesspeople in Dunedin, the text of which was released on the bank's website.

how good of a driver a person is... do they change lanes erratically, talk or text on the phone while driving, tailgate, or any other bad habits that would cause a person to not own the vehicle for a long period of time?

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi told fellow Democrats to change their phone numbers and not let family members read their text messages after a cybersecurity breach led to the release of personal information of members of Congress and their staff.

New Link Building Guidelines for Guest Blogs and Press Releases - Brafton's take on the changes to link building guidelines, explaining that guest blogging is still okay as long as the intent is not to build links and that PR content will have to develop new rules when including anchored text.

The standard intelligent design belief has been proven in court to be completely based on changing a few words in a creationist text to try to make it legally «not religious.»

Although the texts of the teachings don't change much, societies interpretation of ancient texts evolves as social awareness and social consciousness evolves.

Startlingly, the text itself points to two different voices that Abraham has heard, not one voice that has changed its mind.

In this work he commented one by one on all his writings, giving details about the date and circumstances of the work, noting places where he had changed his mind, pointing out passages where he got things wrong, for example where he had cited a biblical text from memory and not gotten it correct.

I don't think we have the right to take those words out of the Bible or change the text.

All the tortured interpretations that people do after the fact to shoehorn va.gue text into now known facts won't change that simple fact:

Gadamer, of how the inspired text, which we question in order to find its meaning and relevance, questions, criticizes, challenges and changes us in the process -» Some who today raise the proper question, whether there are not culturally relative elements in Paul's teaching about role relationships (an the material has to be thought through from this standpoint), seem to proceed improperly in doing so; for in effect they take current secular views about the sexes as fixed points, and work to bring Scripture into line with them - an agenda that at a stroke turns the study of sacred theology into a venture in secular ideology.

There again Michael you are confusing Roman culture and Greek culture... there is not fact and verifiable to your claim only random hypothosis motivated by an emotional sinful culture to change Jesus» words... instead of proof texting take all the text together they all condition that marraige is between man and woman... and unless you can have babies your arguement is futile.

No matter what you say, it wont change the text, no matter how hard you try, i can not fix your hate and blindness of alternatives, and im sorry i make you so flustered sir.

While the basic structure and words of the core components of the liturgy do not change from Sunday to Sunday, there are changes in other texts, particularly the various readings from Holy Scripture appointed for every Sunday and festival day, that give the various times in the Church Year their unique emphases and nuances.

They just change something that they do nt agree with, and refer to the original text as a «mistake».

As a non-Christian I don't particularly care about the details, just noting that they do seem to shift focus rather than abandoning the text, which isn't a change since that's what Christians have really been doing all along.

What I do believe is that we need to really know Jesus to know God — Although text meaning can change Jesus who is the word of God — His personality doesn't change...... so when you read behind the text and see the personality of Jesus — you get to know Him for who He is and then I can test anything the bible or text say against His character for truth!

The ultimate objective of the otherness of texts is not merely the establishment of the truth of ideas and concepts constitute integrity and contribute to change in the world.

'' - If someone upon investigation of the two sides of the issue determines that they do nt personally believe one or both was part of the original text, removing them does not change Christian doctrine one iota.»

There probably isn't a single text from antiquity that hasn't been changed more times than the Bible.

I've heard something to this effect too, but not just the Talmud, but that that what we have in the Masoretic Text, was «too messianic» and that got change, and that the» 70» or septuagint, is much closer to the originals than the Hebrew Text.

You can post quotes from and references to this book all year long and it will not change the fact that: Yes, there are some practical words of wisdom for peaceful human behavior in it (as there are in most religious texts), but just because this is true it does not make all of the supernatural fantasies in it true.

No change was made in the text, partly because Whitehead did not clearly specify a substitute.»

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

This somewhat optimistic prediction of things to come may not seem helpful for the here and now, because we live in an era of fear, anxiety, and worry, and our question and our text is how can we adapt now and in the immediate future to this rapid rate of social change.

A church that does not want the world changed will either be offered a text - world of transformation that calls the present into question (# 3 above), or a text - world that celebrates equilibrium (# 4 above).

We all know that 99.9 percent of the time, that text message isn't anything close to life - changing.

Two understandings changed my view of this text: 1) That the Jewish usage of the Hebrew Bible was to provoke questions and discussion and layered complex understandings, not to provide singular absolute answers, and 2) one thread running through the text is a call for us to grow and move beyond the understanding and wisdom of our faith ancestors.

Then, this Jewish conception would have had to produce a saying which exhibited those characteristics which are regularly to be found in the Christian sayings, but, apart from this one text, not at all in Judaism: the «they will see», and the change in word order bringing the cloud phrase next to the verb.

The Bolivian text is broadly in keeping with the Principles of Organic Agriculture.The current UNFCCC agriculture text is likely to be adopted at Mexico unchallenged with most countries not wanting to risk failing to achieve an overarching agreement on climate change due to what is sure to be huge differences on agriculture.

The text can not be changed after it is signed.

Changes include keeping text clear, formatting layouts and tables, and making sure links adequately describe where they go («click here» does not mean much in isolation).

Get an Economics text and read up on supply and demand... you will see that Arsenal is not a top three team in England, and at the same time, the game has changed to make our team even more insignificant.

I haven't had any emergency text messages at all yet this festive season, although now I've tempted fate, maybe that will change.

Not only has this convertible car seat been put through rigorous side impact texting but has also been tested for extreme temperature changes.

A LOT of the objections I see to Babywise are ideas that the Ezzo's never meant to convey (or possibly the text had changed by the time I took the course — mine was not the first edition, and I know they got a lot of feedback and made some alterations as they went)-- such as «never feed your baby if it's not a scheduled time».

I need to figure out how to change it and just incorporate the pink and orange as highlight colors, not main text colors!

Reuters has not yet published this fact, but I noticed this morning that the Times Prescriptions post now reads (without indicating that the text has been changed — not cool, NYT!)

There was not legislative text presented at the meeting as lawmakers continued to debate what changes would be made.

Myth busting reality: It will not be illegal to change components on a motorcycle There will not be spot checks of motorcycles on the road It will only apply to new motorcycles ABS - Commission wants powers to specify minimum safety equipment for motorcycles including mandatory ABS on larger bikes or CBS on smaller bikes as well as Automatic Headlights On (AHO) on all bikes Myth busting reality: Original text excludes enduro and trail bikes Off switch probably up to manufacturer discretion AHO already on nearly all bikes sold in EU

As Prof. Benjamin correctly states, the NY Court of Appeals in Pataki v. Silver made it additionally plain that the Legislature does not have the power to change text in an Article VII bill.

It's probably worth making explicit that constitutional amendments aren't amendments in the Robert's Rules of order «motion to amend» sense of changing the text of other potential legislation under consideration, but new legislation which might have to pass special procedures in order to be enacted.

«The news today will not change our course,» Erin Lehane, a spokeswoman for the building trades, said in a text message.

* Correction, 1:08 p.m., 19 February: The text has been changed to reflect that the data was collected by the Phoenix lander, not the Opportunity rover.

We have changed the text to reflect that they are not.

The new text will say: «To describe those who don't accept climate science or dispute the world is warming from man - made forces, use climate change doubters or those who reject mainstream climate science.

PicScout's fingerprinting algorithm seeks out elements of an image that don't change even when a picture has been cropped, rotated, flipped or had text overlaid on it, says PicScout CEO Offir Gutelzon.