Sentences with phrase «nothing against authors»

I have NOTHING against authors — whether published or unpublished.

Nothing against the author but that 4 - 4 was against 9 men.

Not exact matches

As every single allegation that this author mentions above against R. Shalom Moshe Rubashkin has been proven false by trial in Iowa, this is nothing more than slander.

It is a rant, and nothing more, as evidence by the wildly false claim the author made as to the supposed lack of evidence supporting the claims she is railing against.

Not for nothing do we warn authors against thinking that the «outlier» successes can be the norm.

I don't read ebooks out of personal choice (nothing against them, I'm just in love with books as objects) but when I read a blog and the author has a book coming up, I more likely to check it our if the cover is pleasing, daring, etc

And while much of this might seem like nothing more than petty playground behavior between children who honestly do not have a clear good guy or bad guy, keep in mind that several ebook retailers incorporate the Goodreads» API into their sales pages, effectively posting book reviews that many in the Goodreads community knew to be false, and nothing more than an act of revenge against an author; real - world sales decisions have been made by consumers based on these reviews.

When it comes to dealing with book bloggers many have made choices to reduce the number of requests and often this has nothing to do with the author who happens upon their blog, yet many times I've seen authors take it personally like the blogger was against them.

I have nothing against indie - authors, I have everything against spam.

To say nothing of the multitude of independent authors I would be up against, who could afford to offer their books at a more competitive price.

Now, I have nothing against Ghost - writers, many of who are simply budding hard working authors who need to «come out of the closet» to announce their talents to the world.

As you may know from reading my blog, I'm generally against query letters of all kinds since they are seldom read and indicate virtually nothing about the book or the author.

I've got nothing against «zon trying to make money at their business, I just don't think they should do so on the backs of indie - authors.

I have nothing against, Barnes and Noble, but Borders is a strong supporter of local arts, launches new authors on a regular basis, and works with publishers in a cooperative manner.

Okay, as a business you have to make a profit and I have nothing against that but do you hold out the general public, and in this case, aspiring and published as well as unpublished authors, and small publishers, to not be able to see what's going on?

I have nothing against traditionally published authors.

What we're talking about is them trying to create negative hype around an author regarding the author's sanity, or posting malicious reviews that have nothing to do with the novel or were only posted to join the latest petition against an author.

-- This is just to establish that I have nothing against self - published authors at all.

It is sad there is a stigma associated with indie authors — that we even need to have labels... I never even sent my book to a traditional house or sought an agent (nothing against those who did by any means)-- but I wanted to publish on my own (keep my rights, etc.).

Those against raised the specter of abuse (there are several questionable agents in Writer Beware's files who soak their clients for billable hours while doing little or nothing to place manuscripts with reputable publishers), the loss of agents» entrepreneurial edge if they got paid no matter what (the fact that the agent profits only when the writer does is at the heart of the traditional author - agent relationship); and, of course, the possibility that only wealthy writers could afford to have agents.

The initial reaction has been that the new deal will work better for authors with longer books but there's nothing working against shorter books if they have a high level of engagement.

I have nothing against the premise or the author, I simply have not gotten around to holding a copy in my hands nor have I felt the urge to.