Sentences with phrase «nothing in the new testament»

Everybody agrees that it was his central message, yet there is nothing in New Testament interpretation and scarcely anything in Christian theology about which opinions differ more.

NOTHING in the New Testament teaches violence.

There is nothing in the New Testament that instructs Christians to yoke themselves to the unbelieving State for the purpose of killing the enemies of Caesar.

There is nothing in the New Testament that teaches oppression.

That kind of power is something the Church still has in some cultures today, but there's nothing in the New Testament that supports this kind of power for the Church at all.

@bostontola, i disclosed a few visions above this thread there is nothing in the new testament that promotes Jihad.

There is nothing in the New Testament, for example, to parallel the large collections of «observations on life and the world - order,» which we call the wisdom literature of the Hebrew Scriptures, or its extensive range of liturgical poetry, or the detailed corpus of its laws on what we would regard as secular matters.

Not exact matches

@glossolalia — read your whole bible (especially the New Testament) Christ specifically addressses «clean» and «unclean» restrictions and how that relates to the Law after His arrival on the scene (i.e. nothing passes away from the Law, but that it is fulfilled in Him).

In fact the new testament wasn't collected until at least 96 after the death of Christ, which means being a Christian had nothing to do with the New Testament, since it wasn't written ynew testament wasn't collected until at least 96 after the death of Christ, which means being a Christian had nothing to do with the New Testament, since it wasn't writestament wasn't collected until at least 96 after the death of Christ, which means being a Christian had nothing to do with the New Testament, since it wasn't written yNew Testament, since it wasn't wriTestament, since it wasn't written yet.

I can find nothing anti-physical or anti-sexual in the New Testament.

Another staggering mishandling of Scripture occurs when Piper claims that the household codes of the New Testament, wherein the biblical writers urge wives to submit to their husbands and husbands to love their wives, are unique to the Bible and that «there's nothing like it in any culture in the world.»

I feel that more emphasis in Pastoralships should be preached on the New Testament's virtues and most righteous admonitions for positive» sakes so that our socialisms and culturisms do not flutter away and become likened into nothing worthy of proclamations be they from social mountaintops or cultural valleys we all do traverse.

The Koran reveals nearly nothing new beside the Old Testament, excepted that Mahomed and Jesus are ambassadors of God too beside the prophets, mentioned in the Old Testament, like Noah, Abraham, Moses, David etc...

Nothing could be further from the picture of love in the New Testament.

There is nothing new about the letter form, and in the days of the New Testament letters were sometimes unsigned or written in another's nanew about the letter form, and in the days of the New Testament letters were sometimes unsigned or written in another's naNew Testament letters were sometimes unsigned or written in another's name.

Nothing in the history of Christian doctrine since the New Testament, certainly not since Nicaea, can rival this for growth in increased sensitivity.

There are several places in the New Testament where the Old is endorsed and «nothing is to be added or taken away», and Jesus himself says «no one can escape The Law of the Pharisees».

Paul reminds the church at Corinth that when he was with them he had preached nothing except Jesus; a glance at the New Testament will indicate that Paul was not alone in this preoccupation.

The New Testament knows nothing of a leiturgia, latria, diakonia which is localized in an edifice, or to fixed times of occurrence.

New Testament theology is thus disqualified from playing a constructive role in the forming of a theological method which shall take seriously the problem of faith and history, and particularly this faith, rooted as no other religious faith is, in the very concreteness of history, and becomes nothing more than»... the first permanent expression of the distinctively Christian consciousness, and begs the question of the external history of that consciousness» (Ibid., 57, 58) «thus leaving... theology with nothing to discussion except the human need for self - understanding in general.»

The meaning of Jesus in the early church is nothing less than the whole meaning of the whole New Testament.

I'm convinced that there is nothing in scripture that we need to water down or consider to be inaccurate in order to better understand the nature of God in both the old and new testament.

So the New Testament offers man a way out where philosophy sees none: «At the very point where man can do nothing, God steps in and acts — indeed, he has acted already — on his behalf»

9 This pales in textual comparison with the over 5,600 copies and fragments of the New Testament in the original Greek that, together, assure us that nothing's been lost.

It means a life which, in New Testament idiom, is «in the heavenly places» even while it is lived here; for belief, worship, and action are seen as worthwhile, since they can never ultimately be frustrated or useless — God receives them, enjoys them, employs them, to «his greater glory», which is nothing other than His continuing loving action in the advance of the creative process towards the good.

He chalked on the table Hoc est corpus meum, Jerome's Latin translation of the Greek in the New Testament for «This is my Body», the implication being that there was really nothing to argue about, the meaning was clear.

Bishop Lightfoot of Durham, the noted nineteenth - century New Testament scholar, once remarked that in his judgment «there is nothing so dangerous as the desire to make everything right and tight.»

The power of love is the security which it gives in our relations to one another, a security which in the New Testament is marvellously affirmed by Paul's word, «nothing can separate us from the love of God».

It is simply suggested that the New Testament writers had a purpose for writing and that unless this purpose is kept in view the analysis of their writings will be fragmentary and will produce nothing but a collection of fragments.

The whole outfit is a testament to inexpensive fashion and shopping your closet as nothing in this outfit is a new purchase.

But he knows «next to nothing» about his mother's plan to make him walk 500 miles.He knows the Camino began around the reign of King Alfonso II - «whom responsible historians surely call The Fonz» - in the 9th century, and that, in the New Testament, Jesus referred to James and his brother John as «Sons of Thunder».

There's a lot regarding the history of the intelligent design movement available on the web, including the entire transcript of the trial in Dover during which the conservative Bush - appointed federal district judge became convinced that it is nothing more than old testament - based creationism with a new label.