Sentences with phrase «nt wiki»

Ask mommy to look up the word, «god» in a good dictionary, not a wiki atheist altered piece of garbage, and ask her to read the definition.

Do yourself a favor: don't wiki it or ask someone else what it's all about.

Don't Wiki too much, although it will be tempting.

Sorry my bad, it's not THEIR wiki but it looks like there are enough links to pages and such that make it indeed a sign that there is year 3 happening.

The information in question was a description of statistical procedures (originated by others, not Wiki) which Prof. Wegman intended to apply to a situation.

Note that SharePointPedia is not a wiki.

Slowly (not wiki wikiApparently meaning «quick» in Hawaiian.)

Though there are some comparisons to a service like Wikipedia, which also relies on user contributions from editors, Spotify says Line - In is not a wiki, but rather a crowdsourced editing tool.

Not exact matches

Parrot measures popularity by looking at Demand Expressions, a measure which (lacking ratings from Netflix, which doesn't release them) combines data on file sharing, social chatter, Wiki activity, fan ratings, and other factors.

There are also numerous online boards, wikis, and chats for people trying to divulge information they don't want associated with their identity.

But even King doesn't argue that Apple should totally wiki - fy itself.

«The neutrality of this article is disputed — Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page — Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met,» explains Wiki when you visit the page.

Off - topic discussion not pertaining to Jeremy Gardner or this wiki will be removed.

wiki,»... Unicorns are not found in Greek mythology, but rather in accounts of natural history, for Greek writers of natural history were convinced of the reality of the unicorn,...»

At no point in church history have so many people written so many books and articles, not to mention blogs, wikis, and e-newsletters, about the Christian faith.

There is the additional weight of the atheist nut jobs like those at Wiki, who deny relativity, but science has not been in conflict with the bible since 1919.

Although, if we go by Wiki (not that Wiki is a primary source, by any means,) then:

from wiki:»... The basis for allowing corporations to assert protection under the U.S. Consti tution is that they are organizations of people, and that people should not be deprived of their consti tutional rights when they act collectively.

@transframer — With all due respect, you didn't really address the issues raised regarding: 1) actual # of extant vertebrate species; 2) the fact that land inverts «breath air» and would have drowned if not accounted for on the ark; 3) that the dino genera identified in the wiki link far exceeds 50; 4) the need to account for extinct land vertebrates in addition to those still around; 5) that many marine fish would have died as their habitat's salinity dropped; 6) that your % allotments for food / water don't reflect the fact that many forms require fresh meat and / or eat disproportionately to their sizes; 7) the specific dietary / environmental constraints involved in the migration to the Ark and the return trips from Mt. Ararat.

Also note that the Wiki article for «Mormons» is locked from editing (semi-protected), while the one for «Catholic Church» is not.

I looked it up further... it should be «Allied Atheist Alliance» I shouldn't have copy / paste it from a crappy wiki page.

Now following the link of «Resurrection of the dead» wiki agrees with the early point of not bodily resurrection but «national resurrection

is further evidence of your bias of homosexuality not occurring in nature which Luke has overturned with a video link in his 11 - 18 post and can be easily found elsewhere online like wiki or a peer - reviewed science magazine like Science Daily.

(Wiki) is not the atoms of today's understanding.

if you do nt like wiki, using Encyclopedia of Wars — 3 Volume of Set reports the same total number of death's from war..

from wiki,»... Unicorns are not found in Greek mythology, but rather in accounts of natural history, for Greek writers of natural history were convinced of the reality of the unicorn, which they located in India, a distant and fabulous realm for them...» One or more would think the naturalists would be arguing FOR the unicorn.

Those are the people who don't get their education from wiki.

Maybe you should actually do some personal research (not the ZIP wiki kind) before you speak.

I certainly agree that the Bible is a collection of wiki - stories that play off similar themes, but I guess I'm not quite convinced that it fits so cohesively together as One Story.

I'm tracking with McKnight on the wiki - stories thing, and I'm tracking with him on the whole «that was then, this is now» thing, but I'm not sure I get the «and the entire Bible can be summarized as...» thing.

From wiki: «Maccoby argued that the real Jesus was not a rebel against the Jewish law, but instead a Jewish Messianic claimant whose life and teaching were within the mainstream of first - century Judaism.

Your wiki quote supports the assent, or agreement, that Jesus was baptized and crucified, but your arguments are based on three other alleged facts, not those assented to.

I'm also glad I'm not alone in using wiki as a resource for the modern english language.

Before that, the Wiki page said something much more vile that isn't worth printing here.

It isn't just his fitness, it is his goalscoring record as well, he has played 247 games and scored 54 according to wiki, that is not a record to bring faith... I know he has played a lot out wide but so has Theo, at least Theo has scored over 100 goals and managed to play 400 games.

According to Wiki (not reliable i know) Welbeck has only scored 20 goals for Man Utd in 90 games since 2008.

If Lukaku doesn't come, I could see Morata coming, but not for anything more than $ 40M... Another option I can see happening is Milik from Ajax, who according to Wiki is a huge fan of Arsenal, so hopefully he'll be motivated to be as good as possible, instead of being content with earning ridiculous money.

Although he says that he hopes no - one pays the buy out clause, the fact is that they bought him for $ 7 million according to Wiki, so that would amount to a nice little $ 23 million profit for Sevilla which is certainly not to be sniffed at, and I am sure they are looking to sell.

Also may I point this out search «LPFP awards» on wiki, who in the breakthrough category apart from Josue do you guys not know?

WebMD, Wiki, and random blog posts in mom forums do not know you, your body, your baby, or the answer to your medical questions.

Image credits: diaper stack — Suzi Satterfield, all rights reserved flats n pins — Wikipedia, used under Wiki Commons license washing machine — Wikipedia, used under Wiki Commons license

You'll have to forgive me if I don't trust a wiki article for a «well - balanced» look at the evidence for such a contentious topic.

Wiki has it's place, but not on this topic.

UPDATE: Since I can not answer my own question, here is the relevant wiki article.

I don't generally take my religious courses on Wikipedia, but even wiki is not decisive about it.

Per the wiki article on US / Russia foreign relations, the two countries don't get along that well.

Wouldn't it be cool as all hell to set up a wiki or something similar that would let people contribute their own small pieces to the puzzle, either from media coverage, government data or personal experience?

A site like this doesn't require the same critical mass to be effective as the wiki above, so it may be useful no matter how many voters it reaches.

At today's Wiki White House at Google (also sponsored by the New America Foundation and Wired), Ellen Miller made a great point: as far as government information goes, «public» information should ultimately mean «online» information — citizens should not have to dig through paper in some government office to find out what an agency (or an officeholder) is up to.

In this wiki age, it makes no sense for 646 Members of Parliament who can not represent the varied views of millions of constituents to travel and sit together to watch the Cabinet's will become law.