Sentences with phrase «nazi holocaust»

Growing up in a Jewish family, the son of a Nazi Holocaust survivor, Bruce recognizes the importance of remembering one's roots, processing personal trauma, and embracing the intrinsic value of all human beings.

-- FRANCOIS HAAS, «German science and black racism — roots of the Nazi Holocaust», FASEB Journal http://www.fasebj.org/content/22/2/332.full

The holocaust that Global Warming will cause will be far worse than the Nazi holocaust.

John, I had thought that France's collaboration via the Vichy Govt with the Nazi holocaust would have precluded them from WW2.

For this honest doubt and skepticism that the highly complex global climate models are correct you have the temerity to socially stigmatize them in a scientific journal with a catch - all term that implies that they are as morally reprehensible as those that «deny» that the Nazi Holocaust of genocide against the Jews?

As a direct descendant of a Nazi Holocaust victim myself, I don't take Nazi references lightly, though I admit to laughing very hard at the Monty Python «Hilter» sketch.

Is it just like during WW2 when they refused to talk about the Nazi Holocaust for that same reason?

Some of them even insist that «denier» and «denial» must be reserved for deniers of the Nazi Holocaust, as if the Holocaust were the only unpleasant fact that can be denied.

Stella derived his inspiration for this series from a book of images detailing the carpentry of Polish synagogue construction prior to the Nazi Holocaust.

But for a German artist in the postwar period, to acknowledge family participation in the Nazi holocaust is remarkable.

«We are here today to remember the millions of victims of the Nazi Holocaust, to make sure that each new generation never forgets, and to reaffirm that we must be on guard so that this never happens again.»

Looking aside from all the other problems in this justification for God's permission of evil, we can again simply note that most people led to atheism because of horrendous evils such as the Nazi holocaust do not say that God should routinely intervene but only that God should have prevented these extraordinary evils.

Hasker's third proposition is that for the problem of divine non-intervention to be a real problem, «we must be able to identify specific kinds of cases in which God morally ought to intervene but does not» Many critics of (traditional) theism probably already have a more or less vague list of such cases, which might include genocidal events, such as the Nazi holocaust and the Rwandan massacre; wars; large - scale natural disasters; conditions of chronic poverty, in which millions of children die from starvation or are permanently stunted because of inadequate protein; the sexual molestation of children, which often leaves them psychologically scarred for the rest of their lives; death preceded by long, painful illnesses, such as cancer or AIDS, or by mind - destroying conditions, such as Alzheimer's disease; and the kinds of events described by Dostoyevski, such as the soldier using his pistol to get a mother's baby to giggle with delight and then blowing its brains out.

«During the discussion about the possible beatification / canonization of Pope Pius XII the major critique of Pius has been his failure to speak out against the Nazi Holocaust with sufficient specificity.

The Genocidal Mentality: Nazi Holocaust and Nuclear Threat by robert jay lifton and eric markusen basic books, 346 pages, $ 22.95

Effective music about the Nazi Holocaust is increasingly finding its way into concert halls (Michael Tilson - Thomas» The Diary of Anne Frank, or music from John Williams» score for Schindler's List).

If God is perfectly good, and if God chose to actualize our particular world not only in its general structure but in its every detail (which God foresaw), including not only (say) the Nazi holocaust in general but every barbarous inhumanity that occurred during it, can we consistently believe that some of the details are genuinely evil?

Against those who worry that an emphasis on the evils of communism might take away from the uniqueness of the Nazi Holocaust, Burleigh argues the reverse: In our Holocaust - conscious culture, there is no danger of Nazism getting short shrift; there is, however, a danger of communist atrocities being forgotten or relativized.

Why don't we give Tutsis, Cambodians, Bosniak Muslims or any other victim of numerous genocides the same status for retributive justice accorded to Nazi holocaust victims, (which of course includes Jews, Romany, gays, etc).

Purcell goes on to consider the testimony of Etty Hillesum, a highly educated Dutch Jew who perished in the Nazi holocaust.

Duh... except for the Inquisitions, the Nazi Holocaust, the witch trials, etc. edd, you better take a close look at Buddhism.

There is considerable discussion in some circles about the role of the Holy See with reference to Nazism and the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews.

More importantly, Courtois crossed the line when he compared the Soviet Gulag with the Nazi Holocaust.

The evil of such a position can be shown by the simple test of applying it to the Nazi Holocaust.

There has been a strong feeling throughout the Islamic world that it is western guilt over the Nazi Holocaust that has caused the West to give such uncritical support to Israel and to be blind to the plight of the Palestinians.

Better to understand Chesterton's idea that Jews were not naturally a part of English culture without the inevitably determinative intervening lens of the Nazi holocaust, we might compare it with modern English perceptions of the problem of multiculturalism as it applies particularly to the Moslem community, still widely seen as being impossible to assimilate: thus, there is understood by many decent and tolerant people to be what might be termed a «Moslem problem» (just as many decent and tolerant gentiles in Chesterton's day thought there was a «Jewish problem»).

Not exact matches

Meanwhile, a Holocaust denier who the GOP has denounced as a Nazi won the Republican primary after running unopposed.

Using the Nazi; s and their Holocaust does not change the facts.

The Holocaust was not all about the Jews, it was about Nazi Germany's attempt to kill off ALL who did not comply with their standards of a human being.

The treatment of the Nazi period in all its aspects - Hitler's rise to power; his establishment of a dictatorship in Germany; the abolition of the rule of law; the persecution of all kinds of political opponents; the racially motivated persecution of the Jews, culminating in the Holocaust; the reticence and opposition of German citizens; and, Germany's instigation of World War II - is compulsory teaching matter at all types of schools in Germany and at all levels of education.

«scholars maintain that the definition of the Holocaust should also include the Nazis» genocide of millions of people in other groups, including Romani, Soviet prisoners of war, Polish and Soviet civilians, ho.mose.xuals, people with disabilities, Jehovah's Witnesses and other political and religious opponents, which occurred regardless of whether they were of German or non-German ethnic origin.

On the Holocaust, for instance, asks McKenna, what if a free - thinking academic were to argue thus: «The Nazis did terrible things, but their mistake was in the minor premise.

Moreover, Jews in western and central Europe» eastern Europe, where the Nazi death machine came without warning, is another matter» with the financial means, geographical mobility, sophistication, and foresight to hold a Swiss bank account were also those most likely to survive the Holocaust.

The banks were accused (in Tom Bower's words) of «a fifty «year Swiss «Nazi conspiracy to steal billions from Europe's Jews and Holocaust survivors» by refusing to hand over the dormant accounts of Holocaust victims to their heirs.

Not responsible, but if they're neo-Nazis, or members of some other group that maintains the core Nazi beliefs, then people have a right to link them with the Holocaust at least on some level, right?

In other words, to say that the Holocaust is objectively morally evil is to say that even if the Nazis had taken over the world and brainwashed everyone into believing that the Holocaust was morally good, it would still be morally evil.

Even if the Nazis had taken over the world and brainwashed everyone into believing that the Holocaust was morally good, it would still be morally evil.

It is possible to put war criminals on trial, demand that Swiss banks return money to Holocaust survivors or their descendants, and require corporations that profited directly from Nazi forced labor camps to pay compensation for that injustice.

Even if the Nazis had won World War II and either killed all opposers or brainwashed everyone into believing that the Holocaust was morally good, it would still be morally evil.

As an example, to say that the Holocaust is objectively morally evil is to say that it is evil even though the Nazis who carried it out thought that it was morally good.

Holocaust never happened... maybe those people should watch the countless videos that nazis, americans and british took, the camps that are still set up and the mass graves in and around Poland.

He shared his faith with his people, and during the Holocaust he shared their fate in the Nazi ovens.

You won't like this but there were a bunch of «rotten apples» who were Christian who committed various atrocities over the ages — the Crusades, the Inquisition, the burning of «witches», the committers of the Holocaust — Nazis, the KKK, etc..

There are still people who think the Nazis is an atheism party and blame atheism for the Holocaust.

«If we take the solemn vow of «never again» as we have since the Jewish Holocaust under the Nazis, we have to call it as such for the Christians,» she said.

However, in 1951, German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, who viewed Jewish reparations as part of the burden Germans needed to confront frankly in order to wipe out the Nazi past, offered reparations amounting to DM 3.45 billion to the survivors of the Holocaust, and a second agreement in 1953 committed the Federal Republic to still further reparations payments.

In 1997, the World Jewish Congress succeeded in exposing the complicity of the Swiss banking system with the Nazi persecution of German Jews, and, after some hesitation, Swiss banks announced their intention to create a Holocaust Fund for Holocaust victims whose family assets had disappeared into Nazi accounts in Swiss banks.

As the Nazi's raised hell in the Holocaust in Europe in the 1930s and early 40s, his holiness Pius XII stood silently by... Fast forward to the epidemic of priestly pedophilia, covered up and stone - walled for decades by the Holy See.

In this view of Jewish chosenness — given its clearest expression, after the Holocaust, in George Steiner's 1999 novel The Portage to San Cristóbal of A.H. — envy of the Jews» claim made the Nazis do two things.

Elie Wiesel recounts his story of life in the Nazi concentration camps to Bill Moyers on Holocaust Remembrance Day in 1991.