Meanwhile there are plenty of papers referenced at archaeological sites from scholars looking at e.g.
neanderthal populations in Europe to 30,000 BCE and concluding anywhere from 10k to 100k max individuals could be sustained reliably.
This theory discounts any human intervention in the decline of
Neanderthal populations, but still leaves open the possibility of other extinction scenarios.
Our results are compatible with a scenario where the Neanderthal genome accumulated many weakly deleterious variants, because selection was not effective in the small
Neanderthal populations.
The authors of the study, an international team from Portuguese, Spanish, Catalonian, German, Austrian and Italian research institutions, say their findings suggest that the process of modern human populations absorbing
Neanderthal populations through interbreeding was not a regular, gradual wave - of - advance but a «stop - and - go, punctuated, geographically uneven history.»
Which makes sense, since Denisovans probably split off from
a Neanderthal population.
«This scenario reconciles the discrepancy in the nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA phylogenies of archaic hominins and the inconsistency of the modern human -
Neanderthal population split time estimated from nuclear DNA and mitochondrial DNA,» says researcher Johannes Krause, also of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History.
This suggests that
the Neanderthal population size once was much bigger than that estimated for the final stage of their existence.
The differences between their mitochondrial DNA indicate that there was more mitochondrial genetic diversity in
the Neanderthal population than was previously thought.
Thus,
the Neanderthal population peak seems to lie in this period.
Not exact matches
Not only does this suggest modern humans might have been stepping tentatively into Europe and getting friendly with
Neanderthals long before the wave of migration that led to today's
population, it shows
Neanderthals were more diverse than we thought.
Signs of this mysterious early migration remained in the DNA of the
Neanderthal who left the leg bone behind, revealing not only a previous tryst between the two hominin
populations, but a sign that
Neanderthals were far more diverse than we thought.
With 23andMe's ancestry reports, users have access to information about their ancestry composition (which geographic regions your genes align with), haplogroups (genetic
populations that share a common ancestor), and
Neanderthal ancestry.
«Archaic human admixture with modern Ho.mo sapiens occurred at least twice in history: with
Neanderthals, and with the
population to which the Denisova ho.minin belonged.
For decades, researchers theorized that the Skhul - Qafzeh
populations represented a «missing link» between
Neanderthals and us.
«Both of these factors may have helped to limit the amount of
Neanderthal DNA that was retained by human
populations in the region,» Taskent says.
The second was the hypothesized presence of a «basal Eurasian»
population — a
population of Western Asians that never interbred with
Neanderthals.
Modern humans interbred not only with
Neanderthals, but also with our recently - discovered relatives the Denisovans, as well as a currently unidentified
population of pre-modern hominins.
In addition to exploring the specific functions of genetic material that the Turkish
population inherited from
Neanderthals, the study also examined the
Neanderthals» influence on human
populations in Western Asia more broadly.
The differences in
Neanderthal ancestry between Western Asian and other
populations may be due to the region's unique position in human history, Taskent says.
People who live in Europe, Central Asia and East Asia today may be descended from human
populations that treated Western Asia as a waystation: These human
populations lived there temporarily, mating with the region's
Neanderthals before moving on to other destinations.
«When the Manot people came to Israel, they encountered a flourishing
population of
Neanderthals, with whom they must have communicated, shared tools and interbred with,» said Prof. Hershkovitz.
While it is widely accepted that the origins of modern humans date back some 200,000 years to Africa, there has been furious debate as to which model of early Homo sapiens migration most plausibly led to the
population of the planet — and the eventual extinction of
Neanderthals.
It's possible, he believes, that a
population of hominins —
Neanderthals, Denisovans or even archaic Homo sapiens — followed the animals.
Professor Thomas Higham said: «Other recent studies of
Neanderthal and modern human genetic make - up suggest that both groups interbred outside Africa, with 1.5 % -2.1 % or more of the DNA of modern non-African human
populations originating from
Neanderthals.
The chronology also pinpoints the timing of the
Neanderthals» disappearance, and suggests they may have survived in dwindling
populations in pockets of Europe before they became extinct.»
It is widely acknowledged that during this time, anatomically modern humans started to move out of Africa and assimilate coeval Eurasian
populations, including
Neanderthals, through interbreeding.
Looking at indicators of
population size and density (such as the number of stone tools, animal remains, and total number of sites), he concluded that modern humans — who may have had a
population of only a few thousand when they first arrived on the continent — came to outnumber the
Neanderthals by a factor of ten to one.
The group also studied the OR7D4 gene in the ancient DNA from two extinct human
populations,
Neanderthals and the Denisovans, whose remains were found at the same site in Siberia, but who lived tens of thousands of years apart.
Denisovans,
Neanderthals and modern humans descend from the same
population of ancestors, who most likely lived in Africa between 550,000 and 765,000 years ago.
These findings shed new light on the role of
population size on losing or maintaining
Neanderthal ancestry in humans, and add to our understanding of our close relatives — the
Neanderthals.
The scientists estimate that these gene variations were able to persist in
Neanderthals because
Neanderthals had a much smaller
population size than humans.
Previous work has also shown that, following hybridization, many
Neanderthal gene variants were lost from the modern human
population due to selection.
«It opens up our ability to ask questions about how Middle Pleistocene hominins lived in this region and it might be a key to understanding the nature of interbreeding and
population dispersals across Eurasia with modern humans and archaic
populations such as
Neanderthals.»
By comparing DNA from modern
populations with the reconstructed genomes of
Neanderthals and Denisovans, they discovered that several HLA variants from the archaic groups are still around.
Or as Reich puts it: «Denisovans harbour ancestry from an unknown archaic
population, unrelated to
Neanderthals.»
Tiny
populations may have prevented
Neanderthals and Denisovans from developing cumulative culture.
Early modern humans interbred with
Neanderthals, but thanks to our bigger
population evolution has purged out many of the deleterious genes we acquired this way
«Tiny
populations may have prevented
Neanderthals from developing more advanced technologies»
If the
Neanderthals didn't lose out because of their inferior social skills, maybe they interbred with modern humans and simply disappeared into the larger
population.
Neanderthals were adapted to the cold, as shown by their large braincases, short but robust builds, and large noses â $» traits selected by nature in cold climates, as observed in modern sub-arctic
populations.
Yet during one cold period, when the
Neanderthals retreated,
populations of Homo sapiens began to infiltrate the cold regions.
Anthropologists suspect that there was never a huge
population of
Neanderthals, although we do not have enough evidence yet to know how many lived at any given time.
The two Levantine
populations are impossible to distinguish from their cultural remains alone, although
Neanderthals have special anatomical adaptations for withstanding severe cold, such as stocky, well - muscled bodies and large noses.
Nevertheless, the remaining 2 percent still seems to be quite substantial, which means
Neanderthal DNA still has some undue influence on the European
population not only with regard to health conditions but also on physical attributes such as light skin and straight hair.
Neanderthal DNA from a femur offers scientists proof that a small human group left Africa and disappeared long before the ancient human migration that spearheaded modern human
population.
Previous studies seemed to tell the tale of the last
population of
Neanderthals huddled in a Croatian cave 32,000 years ago as modern humans invaded Europe.
The authors pinpointed the slender
population size of the
Neanderthals mixing with a huge group of modern humans as the likely factor behind the gene erosion.
«One important insight stems from the observation that modern non-Africans and archaic
populations share more derived alleles than they should if there was no admixture between them,» Bohlender said, citing that sequencing of complete
Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes offers insights into human history.
Neanderthals may have been recruited into certain human
populations that they may have been in contact with on a daily basis.
«Our approach can distinguish between two subtly different scenarios that could explain the genetic similarities shared by
Neanderthals and modern humans from Europe and Asia,» Konrad Lohse, study co-author and
population geneticist at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland, said in a statement.