These internal incidents of workplace violence leave employers largely liable for any problems that occur in the workplace under the «
Negligent Hiring Doctrine» dictating that employers can be held liable for damages if they knowingly employ persons known to pose a potential threat to co-workers or the public.
According to
the Negligent Hiring Doctrine, employers... Read more»
Today's economy places greater emphasis upon employers to tighten up their employment screening policies and ensure they do not violate
the negligent hiring doctrine and FCRA requirements.
According to
the Negligent Hiring Doctrine, employers have a duty of care to assess the nature of the employment, its degree of risk to third parties, and then perform a reasonable background investigation to ensure that the applicant is competent and fit for duty.
Not exact matches
As far as the claims against the pizza franchise, the plaintiff alleged negligence under the
doctrine of respondeat superior (Latin for, «let the master answer») and also direct negligence for
negligent hiring,
negligent training, and
negligent supervision.
The plaintiff made several claims, including one under the
doctrine of respondeat superior as well as another claim alleging
negligent hiring.
The origin of the
doctrine making an employer liable for
negligent hiring, as well as
negligent retention, arose out of the common law fellow - servant law which imposed a duty on employers to select employees who would not endanger fellow employees by their presence on the job.