Both use the same
Neonode infrared touch technology for their touch screens along with E Ink's latest Pearl display that's also found in the Kindle and Sony readers.
It employs
Neonode Infrared Touch and does not have a front - light.
Not exact matches
CB hasn't yet played with one of the new - generation Kobo eReaders, but they're the first device to market with the fast Freescale i.MX508 processor, and use
Neonode's zForce
infrared technology to make their Pearl E Ink screens
touch - sensitive.
It does not have a capacitive touchscreen, instead it employs
Infrared Touch technology by
Neonode.
Kobo uses
Neonode's zForce
infrared touch technology, the same as on the Nook.
One of the cool aspects of the Kobo
Touch Edition is that it uses Neonode's new zForce infrared touch technology to make reading on Kobo just like reading a real
Touch Edition is that it uses
Neonode's new zForce
infrared touch technology to make reading on Kobo just like reading a real
touch technology to make reading on Kobo just like reading a real book.
It is important to note that these aren't capacitive
touch, like the Kindle Voyage or Kobo Aura, instead they are employing older
Neonode Infrared technology.
Like the Kobo, the Nook uses
Neonode's Zeforce
infrared touch layer to provide a touchscreen interface.
Like the Kobo
Touch that was announced yesterday, the new Nook
Touch uses
Neonode's zForce technology for the touchscreen, which uses
infrared to detect input.
The Kobo eReader
Touch Edition integrates Neonode's zForce infrared touch technology a 6 - inch E-Ink Pearl display (same as found on Amazon Kindle and Sony Rea
Touch Edition integrates
Neonode's zForce
infrared touch technology a 6 - inch E-Ink Pearl display (same as found on Amazon Kindle and Sony Rea
touch technology a 6 - inch E-Ink Pearl display (same as found on Amazon Kindle and Sony Reader).
The video was uploaded to
Neonode's channel, the same company that makes the
infrared touchscreens for a number of ebook readers on the market, including the Sony Readers, Kobo ereaders, and of course the Nook
Touch.
The device uses
Neonode's zForce optical
touch technology, which uses beams of
infrared light to detect a
touch on the display.
Like the Nook Simple
Touch before it, the Nook Simple Touch With GlowLight uses Neonode's Zeforce infrared touch techno
Touch before it, the Nook Simple
Touch With GlowLight uses Neonode's Zeforce infrared touch techno
Touch With GlowLight uses
Neonode's Zeforce
infrared touch techno
touch technology.
As its name implies, Kobo's new e-reader has a
touch screen and uses the same Neonode infrared technology that's found in Sony's touch - screen e-readers and the new Nook T
touch screen and uses the same
Neonode infrared technology that's found in Sony's
touch - screen e-readers and the new Nook T
touch - screen e-readers and the new Nook
TouchTouch.
Sony was actually the first to license and include
Neonode's
infrared touch - screen technology in last year's PRS - 350, PRS - 650, and PRS - 950 Readers.
(Sony is using
infrared technology licensed from
Neonode for the
touch mechanics, so you barely have to
touch the screen to get a response.)
In all current
touch screen ebook readers the
infrared touch screen technology used is called zForce, provided by
Neonode.
Like the Nook Simple
Touch, the Kobo eReader Touch Edition, and Sony's latest e-readers, this one uses special Neonode infrared technology to sense when you touch the screen — and it works very well, though don't expect iPad - like responsiveness because of e-ink's inherently laggy na
Touch, the Kobo eReader
Touch Edition, and Sony's latest e-readers, this one uses special Neonode infrared technology to sense when you touch the screen — and it works very well, though don't expect iPad - like responsiveness because of e-ink's inherently laggy na
Touch Edition, and Sony's latest e-readers, this one uses special
Neonode infrared technology to sense when you
touch the screen — and it works very well, though don't expect iPad - like responsiveness because of e-ink's inherently laggy na
touch the screen — and it works very well, though don't expect iPad - like responsiveness because of e-ink's inherently laggy nature.