New standardized tests put more emphasis on using evidence to support arguments.
Not exact matches
But while most of the attention went to negotiations about teacher evaluations and
standardized tests,
new policies also were
put in place for dealing with failing schools.
Not satisfied with a state Board of Regents decision to
put a hold on the use of
test scores in teacher and principal evaluations,
New York State Allies for Public Education is urging its members to opt out of local exams that will be taking the place of
standardized, Common Core - aligned
tests used to evaluate teachers.
The movement to
put «the
standardized testing machine in reverse,» in the words of
New York mayor Bill de Blasio, seemed to have legs.
New York State education officials voted on Monday to
put into effect, for the first time, regulations that teachers be evaluated in part by the progress their students make on
standardized tests.
And finally, there's
New Hampshire, which has aggressively pursued a statewide assessment model that
put teachers in the position of creating tasks where students apply their learning in real world situations, rather than flawed
standardized tests.
Otherwise, it could
put BPS at a disadvantage in school rankings if the
new enrollment system causes charters to increasingly siphon off less - expensive students who traditionally perform better on
standardized tests.
He estimates that KIPP will need about 10 percent of the students in a community to really
put pressure on the system as a whole, and in Houston, he is already seeing some evidence of that, as the traditional direct - run schools have begun emulating KIPP policies,
putting up posters about colleges instead of
standardized tests and sending teachers on visits to
new students» homes.
Simply
put, it is not all about
standardized test scores anymore, and the school with the highest scores may no longer be the highest ranked school under the
new system.