Sentences with phrase «none of the books in»

I found my B&N folder on my PC but no books since 2010 is visible there and when I plug the device into my pc it shows none of my books in NOOK (E:)
None of the books in my father's dusty old bookcase were forbidden.
With a few exceptions, for example, none of the books in this year's roundup are likely to show up in a search for writing books or content marketing books.

Not exact matches

Creative chaos It was in the 1883 novel Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None, that Nietzsche, in advancing his concept of the ubermensch, writes, «I tell you: One must still have chaos in oneself, to give birth to a dancing star.»
To sort through the empirical evidence, as happened in the course of my writing the book, is to find many reasons for concern over secularization — including, for starters, the unhappy fact that the rise of «nones» will reduce charitable donations to good causes.
In other words, between two of the most prominent ex-gay books of the 1990s, you got about a couple of blog posts worth of discussion of celibacy, almost none of it directed to practical problems celibates face.
Indeed, none of the supernaturalist historians discussed in this book survive Martin's criticisms in this regard.
No matter title, conference presence, friendship, book credits, phone or email records... etc, none of that makes them Tony Jones or answerable to his sins in anyway.
Atheists have written numerous books, virtually all of which acknowledge countless god concepts, while pointing out that NONE of them has the slightest evidence in their favor.
The Good Book says of mosques in general, «He only shall tend Allah's sanctuaries who believeth in Allah and the Last Day and observeth proper worship and payeth the poor - due and feareth none save Allah.
So, here we are believing whatever story there is in a «holy book» written based on the account of one person that none of us knew, but had an apparition in the middle of the night to get to do something.
More importantly, none of the topics discussed in the pope's book are doctrinal in nature; they are all part of secular mythos that have grown up around Christmas.
Consider further that the Book of Life, as it applies to unbelievers, is a record of those who have offered perfect obedience before God and are thus worthy of eternal life when they are judged by God on the basis of their works at the White Throne Judgment (Romans 2:6 - 16, Romans 10:4, Galatians 3:10 - 12, Revelations 20:11 - 15), none of whose names will actually be found in the Book of Life and will therefore be condemned (Matthew 19:16 - 22).
Your eyes did see my unformed substance; And in your book they were all written, Even the days that were ordained for me, When as yet there was none of them.
I think if these people had worried less about what others might be sharing, and just stayed focused on getting their own book done, maybe we'd be talking about how great their book is because it would be published, rather than all the lives they destroyed in trying to control others and make sure none of their ideas leaked out.
Other reports have nitpicked details of the story, most of which are addressed in the book and none of which detract from her mother's telling of the life and death of Cassie Bernall.
I use the word limitations rather than mistakes, for none of the biographer's statements seems to me false.2 What I miss in the book is awareness of some intellectual advances during the century or more between the end of Darwin's career and the publication of this biography.
His book is an extraordinarily instructive examination of how these patterns unfold in both Scripture and tradition, where all three» often intertwined» operate as the «most appropriate ways» of naming the Trinity, none of which makes the others unnecessary.
«You formed my inmost parts,» the Psalmist prays, «you knitted me together in my mother's womb... Your eyes saw my unformed substance; in your book were written, every one of them, the days that were formed for me, when as yet there was none of them» (Psalm 139:13, 16).
We must accept it as a whole or none at all because if the book or collection of books which I would rather say the Bible is wrong in geology then what good is its theology?
I think it's very easy to forget that the Bible is a book written for human beings, none of whom are exactly the same in circumstance, journey, thought or understanding.
In fact, if nothing in the Second Book of Kings had taken place, if none of the decisions of these men had been made, little would have changeIn fact, if nothing in the Second Book of Kings had taken place, if none of the decisions of these men had been made, little would have changein the Second Book of Kings had taken place, if none of the decisions of these men had been made, little would have changed.
Not most importantly that since the bible is the most heavily researched book in the history of the world by wide orders of magnitude, scholars have thoroughly examined textual criticism issues such as this, and the Christian can rest assured that: — the bible we have is over 99 % original text — none of the verses under issue affect the Christian message of salvation through faith in the atoning work of Jesus on the cross at all, not even the smallest amount.
None of these issues are specific enough in the Book.
Except for a couple of quotes from one Massachusetts soldier, none of the hundreds of excerpts in this book come from Roman Catholics.
Carefully itemizing mercantile bills of sale, inventories of militia and volunteer detachments, the evidence that there was a lack of gun - smiths, records of importation of guns from Europe, the incidence of duels (three in the entire South in the 1760s, none fatal), children's books and toys, comments by eyewitnesses about the abysmal shooting ability of settlers (lacking both the weapons and the gunpowder to practice), court records, and a wide variety of other historiographical resources, the author assembles an overwhelming mass of data to show that military prowess was not, in fact, characteristic of early Americans.
As the American founder and Deist Thomas Paine made clear in his book on God, religion, Deism, etc., The Age of Reason, The Complete Edition, «The Calvinist, who damns children of a span long to hell to burn forever for the glory of God (and this is called Christianity), and the Universalist who preaches that all shall be saved and none shall be damned (and this also is called Christianity), boasts alike of their holy [revealed] religion and their Christian faith.»
How do you respond to those who would argue that many of the sins you describe in this book were committed by others — in some cases long ago — and therefore none of our concern?
Will you blindly follow the men who've told you their religion / book is holy, or will you use your mind to determine that in reality none of them are good?
Clearly Whitehead read Morgan's book (along with Alexander's) and found it «very suggestive» — but in what way we may never really be certain, since none of the central ideas of Morgan's theory reappear or are acknowledged in SMW, nor later in PR and AI.
You can eat cookies and drink wine in a temple, not eat meat or eat fish on friday, mutilate your penis, follow an old book, poke yourselves with pins, pray to rotting bits of corpses... none of us atheists care.
He wrote, «From the most essential and most fundamental about oneself to every single thing or affair in the world, even the meaning of one word or half a word, everything should be investigated to the utmost, and none of it is unworthy of attention... There is no other way to investigate principle to the utmost than to pay attention to everything in our daily reading of books and handling of affairs....
life is about right and worg thats wart i know about the bible you have to have fath in this turth or you will never understeand how the bible has the guid line for how thay can be peace in the world if you will really spead a lot of time reading the bible than look up on google or in some other books to many for me to name im taking about none chritin books at that and comeper them you will find that there is a lot of stuff that proves the bible as being right i wise i kone how to say it better to but i cant sorry but wan you pray just ast if there is a god make your self real to me other wise i have to hard a time beliveing somepen i cant see or hear and he will make his safe real and than you just sheek him to show you ware to go from there
None of these books, nor the metaphysical position which they advocated, has received in recent years the attention which they deserve in Christian theological circles.
In reality, this will be yet more evidence that morality comes from humans, not books, but none of the Christians who undergo this shift will see it that way.
These, often with a title such as The Garden of the Soul were popular, and Luther's prayer book had some of the same prayers in it, but none of the effusive invocations to Mary and the Saints, and without the spiritual profit motive built in.
I will take you and raise you to Myself and clear you [of the forged statement that «Iesa (Jesus) is Allah's son] of those who disbelieve, and I will make those who follow you (Monotheists, who worship none but Allah) superior to those who disbelieve [in the Oneness of Allah, or disbelieve in some of His Messengers, e.g. Muhammad SAW, «Iesa (Jesus), Musa (Moses), etc., or in His Holy Books, e.g. the Taurat (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel), the Quran] till the Day of
Over and over I go back once more to the same memories, none available in this way to any other stream of experiences; always, if I want to, I can recall that I had such and such a mother and father, brothers and sister, went to such and such schools, read certain books, etc., etc., through countless items of the kind.
Through the call I know myself as someone known; my life as something comprehended from beginning to end; my days as already written in that book «when none of them as yet existed.»
Obviously NONE of those low IQ bandwagoners even READ the books (I did a critical analysis of the LOTR series in 12th grade for my English class).
Even though none of the New Testament books was written in Aramaic, the authors of some of them thought in Aramaic, at least at times.
Most of the recipes in this book don't include a photo, and none of the photos are as nice as the one on the cover which makes me think it's probably a stock photo.
None of these stages were in Ruhlman's book.
There are only 7 ingredients, none of which are refined flour, which makes them health food in my book!
Le Prof will already go down in the history books as the coach of the Invincibles and for winning the most FA Cups with one club, and even though Man City are making a concerted effort to go unbeaten this season, none of those landmarks are ever likely to be broken in the forseeable future.
total failure... Can you believe Wenger spent 32 millions on 2 average players (Chambers and Welbeck) and is penny pinching when is sbout real class players?What is in his mind?Pay a fortune in salary for mediocre players live Walcott, Ramsey and Wilshere and have hesitations about increasing Sanchez wages... keeping on books failures like Sanogo... The truth is - I say it for years and years - until the «British core» disapears, we are not going to be succesful.The low quality of British players is dragging the team back.Last time Arsenal was a powerhouse NONE of the first 11 was British.Wanna see how the British quality looks like in a football team - look no further than national sides of England, Scotland, N Ireland, Wales, even Ireland (not British but same style)- all mediocre teams «able» to be defeated by any team coming to mind.And you are asking about Chambers?He is in the same mold like Wilshere,Walcott,Ox,Ramsey,Gibs,Jenkinson - mediocre overpriced and overpaid players.The world is full with hungry, ambitious and skilled players living in poverty and dreaming of moving to the top at any cost or sacrifice (did you see the poor house - if you can call that house, looking more like an old tent - in which Alexis Sanchez grew up?Or Suarez?)
Arsenal Wenger has suggested something that absolutely none of us will want to hear, as it seems that he has slyly ruled out the signing of another central striker, in favour of a player already on our books — Alexis Sanchez.
Now that we have actually won a couple games and booked a place in the FA Cup Final none of them can be bothered to mention it.
Whaaaaaaaaat??!! I managed to get in touch with all three midwives and, guess what, none of them were available for my due month as they already had women on their books and my dates were also slap bang in the middle of summer and that was holiday time.
None of that in this book..
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z