Sentences with phrase «none of the questions in»

None of the questions in this quiz are time - sensitive, so once you have purchased it you can use it every year (Christmas, Easter, end of a unit, whenever you like) with your new classes without having to worry about altering the questions.

None of the questions in this quiz are time - sensitive, so once you have purchased it you can use it every year with your new classes without having to worry about altering the questions.

Not exact matches

WSJ writer John Carreyrou reportedly spoke to four former employees, none of whom are named in his story, including one who «accused the company of failing to report test results that raised questions about the precision» of their tests, which could be «a violation of federal rules for laboratories,» the Journal article said.

None of these questions has a solid, reliable answer, even in startups based on great ideas with all the resources they'd theoretically need.

None of the reporters who asked Allen a question brought up Farrow's story and the allegations in it.

The question during the 1970s was always whether a rally was going to stick or fall apart; none of the rallies held up, except the very last one in the early 1980s.

None of the security guards named in the lawsuit were charged, although FBI special agents told BuzzFeed News that two of them were questioned as «persons of interest.»

I'd like to suggest — in strictly tentative fashion as a hypothesis that I am amusing myself with these days — that as important as each of those questions are, none of them should be the starting point for our doctrine of creation.

Questioning policies of Israel does not make one anti-semitic, just as questioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where theQuestioning policies of Israel does not make one anti-semitic, just as questioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where thequestioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where there is none.

(and they hate you when you ask questions like this - especially preachers) I am a Christian but I am not religious because they do not want ME in their presence O (none of them do).

In Gall's case, this juxtaposition not only reduces philosophy and theology to mere «bluster,» thereby liberating us to act without thinking seriously; it suggests that none of the consequences that follow from, for example, the codification of same - sex marriage — the redefinition of kinship, the irrevocable technologizing of human «reproduction,» further expansion of the «new eugenics,» deliberate creation of three - parent households, and least of all, the fate of children conceived in this brave new world — even provoke questions of human import worth thinking seriously abouIn Gall's case, this juxtaposition not only reduces philosophy and theology to mere «bluster,» thereby liberating us to act without thinking seriously; it suggests that none of the consequences that follow from, for example, the codification of same - sex marriage — the redefinition of kinship, the irrevocable technologizing of human «reproduction,» further expansion of the «new eugenics,» deliberate creation of three - parent households, and least of all, the fate of children conceived in this brave new world — even provoke questions of human import worth thinking seriously abouin this brave new world — even provoke questions of human import worth thinking seriously about.

None of these questions can be answered outside of a theological framework of Christian belief in a personal God who has made us for fellowship with himself and for obedience to his will, who cares for us as individuals, and within the channels of his orderly world gives heed to our petitions.

The sociologist Rodney Stark makes some headway in answering the first part of this question: traditional religion, by invoking supernatural power, can promise eternal life, reunion with the departed, a perfected soul, and unending bliss, all of which have obvious appeal and none of which can be offered by merely secular competitors (Stark 169).

In fact, in discussions of how God might be conceived as conscious or knowing, his comments range all the way from raising the question whether God is really conscious at all to speaking none too clearly of «super-linguistic consciousness» or of «the One who knows without symbol (or for whom everything whatever serves as symbol)» (1967, 4In fact, in discussions of how God might be conceived as conscious or knowing, his comments range all the way from raising the question whether God is really conscious at all to speaking none too clearly of «super-linguistic consciousness» or of «the One who knows without symbol (or for whom everything whatever serves as symbol)» (1967, 4in discussions of how God might be conceived as conscious or knowing, his comments range all the way from raising the question whether God is really conscious at all to speaking none too clearly of «super-linguistic consciousness» or of «the One who knows without symbol (or for whom everything whatever serves as symbol)» (1967, 4f.

In short, none of the traditional models for answering the original question is sufficient by itself.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

WE DO NOT (BAR - NONE) have any original letters written by the men in question, only copies of copies of the oral reports.

None of that is in question..

None of that is in question... however one has to wonder why we consider the current bible canon «the bible» when it was really a collection of letters sifted through and hand picked out of hundreds of accounts from the decades after Christs supposed death.

But the Christian in the story asked none of such questions.

None of the standard commentaries in German or English even addresses this question since speakers of German and English do not have to know that information to translate what Paul wrote, and nothing in the context of the verse provides any clue.

Speaking after the game, Wenger was quick to question the penalty decision that got Watford back in the game, but Deeney was having none of it.

The question that none of us know is whether need is a factor in the Ravens grading system, and if it is how much of a factor is it?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

If it's a question of beating the big teams I think there is none which Arsenal has not beaten in the last 2 seasons.

Yea he could leave and Pep come but trust me it'll never be the same without him, and I am sure no one can replace him without it affecting us, If not Pep, I do nt want Ancelotti or any of those hypocrites out there, you see them question Wenger's trophy achievement but yet none of them could have achieved what he has in this club.

None of those four would cost the acquiring team much so the question becomes which two would garner the most value in return.

Kinda makes sense though, the only reason people are asking for another CDM is because we all fear the possibility of injury to coquelin and know flamini is usless, beilick is inexperienced so it begs the question what happens if an injury where to occur, but wîth how many midfielders we have in the squad i think it could allow us to change a tactical approach and potentially experiment with people like Ramsey and Wishere potentially playing a deeper role??? But the striker is a must as i mentioned earlier Giroud went 8 games without scoring a goal and none of the other strikers stepped up to the plate, we cant have a drought of goals when your the quest for titles...

We have legit question marks from No. 2 through No. 5, with all four players in the mix behind Anthony Davis so convinced that they'll go no lower than No. 4 that none of them will work out for the Sacramento Kings, picking No. 5!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Paulinho, Ander Herrera, Jean Michael Seri and Oriol Romeu are all explicitly mentioned in the report, but all come with their own difficulties as none of the clubs in question will want to sell.

In fairness though, the latter was pretty prolific last season in Argentina although it begs the question why none of the top teams, or even some of the mediocre sides around Europe didn't spot anything out of the ordinary in the 25 year - old but Martinez did, or supposedly haIn fairness though, the latter was pretty prolific last season in Argentina although it begs the question why none of the top teams, or even some of the mediocre sides around Europe didn't spot anything out of the ordinary in the 25 year - old but Martinez did, or supposedly hain Argentina although it begs the question why none of the top teams, or even some of the mediocre sides around Europe didn't spot anything out of the ordinary in the 25 year - old but Martinez did, or supposedly hain the 25 year - old but Martinez did, or supposedly has.

For several decades, critical educators, mostly in philosophy of education, have been questioning the concept of celebrity role model and all that it implies, but none of their arguments have diminished the popularity of the idea.

Here are just some of the grossly inaccurate statements made by Mr. Miller in the clip, none of which were caught — or even questioned — by the Fox interviewer, Tucker Carlson:

None of these clever thoughts and questions really cross their minds in the afternoon when they are busy playing.

«It is coming and none of the 60 people have done anything good for Ghana,» he said in response to a question.

I didn't vote in the one general election I was eligible to vote in, simply because none of the parties did enough to earn my vote... On the other hand, I regularly write to my MP, sign e-petitions, watch Question Time, and so on.

The meeting had none of the seemingly endless remonstrances or resistance of people who wanted to question the validity of whether Greens should be in electoral politics at all.

«You know, I have to question why none of the other men would make that sort of statement, you know, because I find that politics, much like the business I was in before, which was actually finance, prior to my running an agency, is a boy's club, and they all protect each other,» Davis said.

I asked Cuomo campaign spokesman Josh Vlasto about that, and was met with a «no comment» in response to all my questions — whether the AG is having second thoughts about running on Row C and might try to somehow bow out (a near impossibility, since he would have to die, move out of state or run for a judgeship — none of which seems likely to happen any time soon), and whether this changes his reluctance to accept the WFP line.

The Marist poll also included questions about a potential runoff election, in the event none of the candidates garner the necessary 40 percent of the vote to win the primary.

In nearly a year there still has not been a single response, not even a form letter (which is the response made by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand — which answered none of the questions posed) or an automated response (which was the best that Senator Schumer could come up with).

UK Independence Party MEP Nigel Farage, speaking on BBC One's Question Time, said there was not a «single memorable phrase» in the entire 90 minutes, adding «more people will not turn out at the polls as a result of tonight's debate» and the winner would be the «none of the above party».

But none of that excuses the Conservatives» failure to stand up to their own benefactor and their inability to see — despite many warnings — that obfuscation on this question would make matters worse for them in the end.

And yet most of the articles in a recent issue of the Commons» House Magazine (16 May) are written on the assumption that none of the questions which has been re-examined ad nauseam in the past two or three decades can be taken as read.

But none of these approaches address the question of why ghost cities exist in the first place.

«They came up with questions that none of the scientific reviewers thought to ask, asking about another part of the brain that lit up in both the ADHD and control groups and wondering about its function.

Emerging after 12 months of labour in the underworld, I was not able to answer the fundamental question: «Why do none of the German labs I worked in have any windows?»

Then the work really started: we needed to understand which of our questions will be answered in the next decade or so by telescopes already being built (such as NASA's JWST, TESS, or the 30m - class ground - based telescopes)-- none of those questions were interesting for our report.

So an important question left unanswered was: what features in these proteins explain why none of them are able to act as «slicers»?