There is, of course, an academic literature on the subject (which
none of the answers in the PoliticsSE refer to and which the other answer here does not refer to).
None of them answer in english and or even try.
Not exact matches
None of these questions has a solid, reliable
answer, even
in startups based on great ideas with all the resources they'd theoretically need.
If you're running spreadsheets, accounting software, a merchant services account, and a petty cash fund out
of a box
in someone's desk drawer — with
none of it reconciled to a single digital location — the
answer is yes.
In fact, there is nothing special about christianity — it is just one
of many cults that claim to have all the
answers,
none of which provide any real evidence for any
of their supernatural claims.
Answer:
None of those presidents are
in office today, are they?
Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list
of things if we live
in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while
in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way,
none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted
of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out
of marriage, lie, break every commandment
of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot
of people will end up
in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will
answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one
of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word
of God, God hates sin,
None of these questions can be
answered outside
of a theological framework
of Christian belief
in a personal God who has made us for fellowship with himself and for obedience to his will, who cares for us as individuals, and within the channels
of his orderly world gives heed to our petitions.
Then we will never come away empty - handed from prayer, because even if we wind up with
none of the things we thought we needed, we will always wind up with God listening, attending and
answering our prayers
in ways we hadn't imagined.
The sociologist Rodney Stark makes some headway
in answering the first part
of this question: traditional religion, by invoking supernatural power, can promise eternal life, reunion with the departed, a perfected soul, and unending bliss, all
of which have obvious appeal and
none of which can be offered by merely secular competitors (Stark 169).
K what are the differences
in the Denominations since you bring that up, and I would really like a
answer, but
none of the differences has to do with gay marriage though.
These scientist, and doctors, can not remake skin, bone, eyes, brains, oval eggs, sperm,
none of the sort, so they have no real
answer to create a life other than how procreation works, where again what, and how is the very first man, or woman, animal, other creatures, either
in the sea, or creeping on this earth was originally created from, as where did they first come from?
It is ironic that
in his unpublished doctoral dissertation,
in two subsequent articles, 22 and
in Mircea Eliade and the Dialectic
of the Sacred (
none of which displays an acquaintance either with
Answer to Job or the Philp volume), Altizer has persisted
in calling Jung a modern Gnostic whose work amounts to an undialectical world - negation and a flight into a discarnate eternity.
In short,
none of the traditional models for
answering the original question is sufficient by itself.
Jenson
answers: «Well» there are whole immense congregations,
of all denominations or
none, that are post-Christian at least
in their public self - presentation.
It's a little too late for praying, it's Mrs.Clinton's call to be @ the helm; now, with her hubby Mr.Clinton as VP; and one
of you out
of all
of you, need to tell Romney he's committed fraud, for leaving the Post
of so - called gov.that theirs a 2 yr.interval that must be met; the same fo Obama; whom is worst off then Bush Jr.then for
none of you to have no Allegiance to be nothing but commander
of thieves, since April 4th, 1968 to presently;
in the killing
of Dr.King Jr.must still go under Oath to all you perjurers; that mustn't go unpunished to the array
of charges I have stored up against each
of yo on every job, on every public premise; that Obama didn't praywhen he lied to GOD ALMIGHTY
in perjury; to have left the seat
of sen.to jump to the office; knowing he hadn't a clue what to do; so he got Joe, which is Cheney all over; whom should
of been out
of public; and he knows that and all the fugitives, even
in the Italian led court
in DC; that will have to
answer to what is -LCB- H.R. 7152 -RCB-; and why they let Olsen for Bush Jr.waste the American's People's time, not to mention all the lives that's been lost; for the tyrannies since 1968 to presently has cost; Vote I, Edward Baltimore; to confirm I; Governor
of DC; as
of 2/16/12; cause DC; has been a State, already; and all you slaves from State to State; need to snap out
of your peonage which is prohibited by Federal Laws; on anybody!!!!!!!
Those archives revealed that Stein's plea was
answered ¯
in a sympathetic reply by
none other than Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli (the future Pius XII), then Pius XI's secretary
of state.
The
answer then is that the identity
of a line consists
in an unbroken continuity
of points, but that
none of its properties is determined until certain
of its points are actually fixed, e.g., by specifying numbers or laying down certain conditions for a geometrical construction.
PDX — It doesn't take a Genius to realize from my statements that i have read things other than the Bible you moron i have spent many hours reading and listening to scientists about their theories on the big bang, i have listened to ideas from the most revered scientists including Hawking and others, and they all admit that there are holes
in their theories, that nothing fully explains their big bang theory, the physics doesn't add up let alone the concept, there are plenty
of scientists hard at work trying to make the numbers fit and the theory hold weight but if you ask any
of them they can not give you the
answers and the reason being... there are
none, the theory doesn't work, If by the observable laws
of Physics, Matter
in this Universe can not be created or destroyed, you can only change its state, i.e. solid to liquid, to gas... to energy... There is no explanation for how an entire reality full
of Matter can be created out
of nothing... Scientists know this... idiots that are atheists and simply would rather NOT believe that their lives and actions they take within their lifespan are being witnessed by an Omnipotent God do not WANT to believe... but Your belief
in God does not change whether or not he exists you will be judged.
This is an incredibly difficult question to
answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense
in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes
in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess
in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself
in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but
none of these players possess the skill - set required
in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling
in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points
in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis
in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself
in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him
in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive
in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players
in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence
in Real or the space and protection he receives
in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived
in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components...
in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them
in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion
in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin
in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation...
in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often
in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and
in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place
in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
None of us like to think we are different, but it is perfectly normal and keep
in mind there is no one right
answer.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is
in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than
answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis...
in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but
in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest
in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie
in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base...
in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player
in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)...
in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did
in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this
in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players
in the final third... he was never a good defensive player
in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely
in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when
none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)...
in their places we need to bring
in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model
in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically
in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking
in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Turns out the
answer was
none of the above as Tennessee has opted for the mystery box
in rookie 6th round draft pick Zach Mettenberger.
None were
answered and Nestlé currently refuses to speak
in public if Baby Milk Action is present, having lost a series
of debates between 2001 — 2004.
None of her friends had any
answers outside
of generic recycled advice, so Amy embarked upon on a crusade
in the interest
of herself, her unborn son and her family at large.
It's awfully hard to discern an
answer based on the flip - flopping
of endorsements that went on yesterday all over the state
in connection with the highly - coveted Row C. (Perhaps the biggest problem here is trying to apply logic
in a situation where
none seems to exist).
I downvoted your
answer because I think that
none of the points you mention are
in any way relevant to politics.
If you mean «what effect will making those claims will have on the reality
of the future rights to hold that territory», then the
answer is «Pretty much
none in practice».
None of these are «the
answer» to the great disconnect, but while Westminster fails to do all it can, we know its MPs sit too complacently
in their safe seats.
Cornegy and Williams remained
in the race, with the latter blasting the selection process and seeking
answers about why
none of the five candidates
of color were selected.
In nearly a year there still has not been a single response, not even a form letter (which is the response made by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand — which
answered none of the questions posed) or an automated response (which was the best that Senator Schumer could come up with).
Even though, as a group, PAHs seemed to be the
answer to this mystery,
none of the hundreds
of PAH molecules known to exist had ever been conclusively detected
in interstellar space.
Our results indicate that peer discussion enhances understanding, even when
none of the students
in a discussion group originally knows the correct
answer.
Emerging after 12 months
of labour
in the underworld, I was not able to
answer the fundamental question: «Why do
none of the German labs I worked
in have any windows?»
Then the work really started: we needed to understand which
of our questions will be
answered in the next decade or so by telescopes already being built (such as NASA's JWST, TESS, or the 30m - class ground - based telescopes)--
none of those questions were interesting for our report.
Fortunately,
none of these questionnaires are compulsory —
in fact it's completely fine to explore the site without
answering anything beyond whether you're a male or a female, and your age.
Across most
of the categories, the
answer is «
none,» but
in Best Actress and Best Supporting Actor, there are opportunities for surprise.
These are questions that fans like myself were hoping would be
answered or at least hinted to
in this movie so when
none of these things, it was a little disappointing.
When she left the room, after a slight delay to ensure that she was out
of earshot, my students erupted
in laughter because they knew the reason why they looked so engaged —
none of them knew the
answers to my overzealous questions!
5 Worksheets covering all the circle theorems - around 50 questions
in total including
answers Circle Theorems 1 is 10 questions on the angle at the centre and also the same segment Circle Theorems 2 is 10 questions on angles
in a semicircle and a cyclic quadrilateral Circle Theorems 3 is 6 questions on radius / tangent and 2 tangents from one point Circle Theorems 4 is 6 questions on the Alternate Segment Theorem Circle Theorems 5 is 20 questions on all the theorems
None of these questions are ridiculously complex as you get
in textbooks and they are extremely well drawn though not to scale.
However, even when
none of the group members knows the correct
answer, activating one's peers as instructional resources
in solving a problem has been shown to increase learning and correct responses (Smith et al., 2009).
However, over half (51 percent)
of primary school children reported eating four or less portions
of fruit and vegetables the day before, while 67 percent
of secondary school children reported the same; more than one
in ten (12 percent) 14 - 16 year old
answered that they had
none.
But
in none of the states, Florida included, does the law provide the sort
of data and transparency needed to
answer the question
of how neovoucher students do academically or the question
of how many students are prompted by the law to attend private school instead
of public school.
Still attack the other items listed
in the other
answers, but it sounds like you are running
none or almost no anti-freeze
in your system and so getting some
in there will allow your cooling system to continue operating at the higher temperature until you get the source
of the problem sorted out.
The
answer to this question is part
of the reason why most sticker - conscious buyers
in America look right past diesels — not to mention advertising has been limited, so some may not know this one exists — however
none of this is saying diesels have no reason to be.
A novel about our fascination with deadly things, about our insistence on
answers when there are
none, about terror and courage
in the face
of the unknowable.
As for his real name,
none of us ever asked him what it was, except the mayor, perhaps, and then only once, and
in any case I don't believe he received an
answer.
I've read dozens
of marketing articles and a number
of books (including the ones you recommended back
in your
answer to my first comment), but
none of them get into this sort
of nitty gritty detail, and the details like this are what I need and can't find.
No, I won't, because the
answer is «almost all
of them» and «
none of them,»
in that order.
One
answer could be that
none of the companies that owned it had any idea how to make the technology compelling when compared to bright, backlit LCD displays, which are a mature technology that looks great pretty much anywhere but
in full sunlight.