None of these changes seemed to affect the batter... except for the color due to the darker cocoa I used.
None of those changes seem to reach the gravitas and refinement of the Conti's latest iteration.
Some of them have a slightly greater increase in shell building than today, some of them have a lower rate of shell building than today, but
none of the changes seem to be that great.
Not exact matches
None of my ad - libbed
changes seemed to affect the quality
of the outcome, so here I sit with me third... okay, my fifth caramel, typing one - handed.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who
seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but
none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always
seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all
change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved
seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they
seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when
none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and
change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has
changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
If you're nursing and if
none of the above
seems to help, try
changing your own diet by eliminating dairy products, caffeine, onions, cabbage, broccoli, garlic, and spicy foods.
A former adviser to David Cameron has said
none of Britain's leading politicians
seem able to push through the
changes in society needed to «radically decarbonise» the economy.
And it
seems has lost
none of his impatience for
change.
I asked Cuomo campaign spokesman Josh Vlasto about that, and was met with a «no comment» in response to all my questions — whether the AG is having second thoughts about running on Row C and might try to somehow bow out (a near impossibility, since he would have to die, move out
of state or run for a judgeship —
none of which
seems likely to happen any time soon), and whether this
changes his reluctance to accept the WFP line.
He conceded that
none of the councilors
seemed to be aware
of the
change.
But
none of the alternative theories — for instance, that sex generates diversity to help cope with a
changing environment —
seem entirely adequate either, Crow adds.
If
none of the above suggestions
seems feasible, you might consider getting the master's degree and
changing institutions for the Ph.D..
The students knew that the CO2 values were
changing throughout the day, but
none seemed to recognize when concentrations
of this gas rose or fell in their air.
None of the different model versions here
seem to get the large polar amplification
of change seen in the data for instance.
Seven roles in total are in the list, and although
none of them have recognizable names tied to comics (although Shirlie and Blind Al
seem like they could be a match), in many cases
of popular movies the names in casting calls are
changed to avoid leaks.
, Abby tries to sort out her life, but she can't
change her wish list and
none of her childhood fancies
seem to help.
Although this
seems substantial,
none of these options (besides playing Strikers mode)
changes up the core gameplay all that much.
Wikipedia tells me that the film takes place between 1983 and 1996, yet
none of the characters ever show any signs to aging, clothing and hair styles don't
seem to
change, and we're never given any dates onscreen.
Authors find themselves between a rock and a hard place, at the mercy
of a fast -
changing market,
none of whose players
seem to know which way to turn or which direction -LSB-...]
Your dog might have gained a little weight, be a little lethargic, or have slight
changes in behavior,
none of these symptoms
seem serious but if left untreated it can lead to a more severe problem.
I was sorely disappointed because for two long months I tried a lot
of different brands
of cat's food but
none of them
seems to work with my cats BUT everything
changed when they began eating Ziwi Peak and now I'm very happy to tell you that both
of them are perfectly healthy.
She
seems to have an ever -
changing list
of places she wants to go and things she'd like to focus on...
none of which include cleaning her room.
Since almost
none of the Stormhoek blog entries have any comments, it doesn't
seem like there was a big flow
of info about the market coming in to
change how anything was done.
Whereas each aesthetic
change seems expressive
of different distinct emotional nuances,
none feel like an end to something.
On the surface,
none of the
changes I've proposed
seem very radical, but cumulatively they move our consumption levels down a notch, which is exactly what I was hoping.
So if there's no external heating setting up temp differences and
none from the planet (as we have from different heat capacities
of surface stuff), does that really make it any different from what we have on Earth, because what we have on Earth is more interesting with all the temp variations coming into play, but they are, it
seems to me, sort
of superimposed on and weaving in and out
of a basic which doesn't
change, with stratified temp differences by gravity already well mapped.
None of the attempted explanations for
changing CO2 levels in geological time — I'm thinking here
of million - year scale —
seem very convincing to me.
Upon initial review, the CIS found funds classified as climate ODA from Belgium going to a «Love movie festival», or ODA coming from Greece going to a «Green Parliament contribution to UNICEF telemarathon», or Switzerland allocating funds for «Earthquake safety»,
none of which
seem to have anything to do with mitigation or adaptation, unless the «love movie festival» reduced the vulnerability
of a country to the impacts
of climate
change by further expanding their emotional depth.
None of this should come as a surprise: The paper
seemed to undermine a key piece
of evidence suggesting that we can actually see and measure the consequences
of human - induced climate
change.
To me,
none of the Tiljander records
seem to say much about climate
changes (eg temperature or precipitation) going into the LIA.
Ans: 3 % x 3C = 0.09 C, which is consistent with the temperature
changes in that time span (some
of the reconstructions
seem to show a
change of up to 0.2 C, but
none show an increase).
I found it very strange that
none of the major parties even
seemed to mention climate
change as an issue in the last election.
None of this is remotely surprising — even though Palin
seemed to indicate she had begun wondering whether climate
change was caused by man, she's got a history
of believing the contrary.
IMO,
none of these
seems effectively targeted (either logically or policy wise) at the issue
of the relationship between climate
change and extreme weather.»
At close to 1000 comments, it
seems to have
changed none of the participants, and probably
none of the bystanders, given the intense emotional, ideological, and political underpinnings
of this issue.