Not exact matches
The sixty - four thousand dollar
question is «when
does it matter» and
none of us know but I think we're more confident that it will definitely will matter.
None of those
questions have anything to
do with science vs god.
Questioning policies of Israel does not make one anti-semitic, just as questioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where the
Questioning policies
of Israel
does not make one anti-semitic, just as
questioning Obama's policies does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where the
questioning Obama's policies
does not make one a racist when race is not brought up in the subject, however many Jews call out anti-Semitism where there is
none.
(and they hate you when you ask
questions like this - especially preachers) I am a Christian but I am not religious because they
do not want ME in their presence O (
none of them
do).
Same
question if
none of this stuff exists then where
did the ideas all come from?
Free will doesn't answer the
question since if your god was concerned with that, then why the radical chance
of its modus operandi from the supposed personal appearances
of these gods to
none at all?
But
none of this should divert us from the fundamental
question: To what vision
of ecumenical opportunity
does this historical moment call us?
I commented on this cause a lot
of people don't believe it... It's a faith thing... You called me out on the simple matter
of metaphor which to me is out
of the
question but
none the less true.
Gil you have asked some very good
questions why
does bad things happen in the world i personally
do nt know God
did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i
do know is that God desires that
none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make
of that.What we
do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to
do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders
do you know that
did that or
did the miracles that Jesus
did.As far as the bible is concerned much
of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many
of prophetic words spoken many hundreds
of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death
of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how
does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz
WE
DO NOT (BAR -
NONE) have any original letters written by the men in
question, only copies
of copies
of the oral reports.
None of the standard commentaries in German or English even addresses this
question since speakers
of German and English
do not have to know that information to translate what Paul wrote, and nothing in the context
of the verse provides any clue.
question: if
none of the answers we actually arrived at ever pointed to «gods»... what makes ANYONE believe «gods» will ever be the answer to any
of the
questions like «how
did the universe begin?»
Just a
question: Your ingredient list doesn't match the directions
of preparation: Referring to adding the buttermilk when
none is listed, may be confusing, thanks!
I've given dozens
of people my whole wheat products and
none of them even
questioned it, which means they totally were diggin» it and didn't even know.
This is an incredibly difficult
question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out
of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we
did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out
of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but
none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I
do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he
does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he
did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out
of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack
of mobility is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Yea he could leave and Pep come but trust me it'll never be the same without him, and I am sure no one can replace him without it affecting us, If not Pep, I
do nt want Ancelotti or any
of those hypocrites out there, you see them
question Wenger's trophy achievement but yet
none of them could have achieved what he has in this club.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more
questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then
do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in
question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we
did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when
none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I
do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club...
does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has
done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
In fairness though, the latter was pretty prolific last season in Argentina although it begs the
question why
none of the top teams, or even some
of the mediocre sides around Europe didn't spot anything out
of the ordinary in the 25 year - old but Martinez
did, or supposedly has.
None of this precious co-operation would work if the majority
of adults
did not know how to exercise enough self - restraint to listen to one another, and if they
did not know how to make choices they could justify, or to
question the decisions
of others, or if they could not negotiate with a person with different views and values.
Speaker John Bercow isn't impressed, and moves on as
none of the
question had anything to
do with Hunt's responsibilities.
«It is coming and
none of the 60 people have
done anything good for Ghana,» he said in response to a
question.
I didn't vote in the one general election I was eligible to vote in, simply because
none of the parties
did enough to earn my vote... On the other hand, I regularly write to my MP, sign e-petitions, watch
Question Time, and so on.
I don't have time to hunt for references, but
none of the existing answers mentioned alternate methods (internally generated, such as organizers giving out pins / etc... and counting how many were given); and then there's a related
question discussed on a resent 538 podcast over the accuracy
of internal estimates by organizations.
Despite the dozens
of hustings, debates and interviews,
none of the five candidates has yet been able to offer a convincing answer to that basic but all - important
question: what
do you stand for?»
When alarms were raised over monetary inducements and reckless political spending during the campaigns,
none of the major contenders for public offices
questioned the sources
of funding
of the electioneering because
doing so at that period might jeopardise their political aspirations.
«The district attorney
did reach out to me and assured me that
none of the allegations are true and said that he would like an opportunity to answer any
questions that the legislators have.»
However, the person actually witnessing the signatures
did not initial the documents and almost
none of the first lines on the documents were signed calling into
question, when and how the petitions were amended.
Emerging after 12 months
of labour in the underworld, I was not able to answer the fundamental
question: «Why
do none of the German labs I worked in have any windows?»
Why
did you respond to this statement but
none of the other many
questions and statements on this thread?
Whilst it is easy to
question this (and
none of us can be 100 % sure that he
does nt), the ethos around calisthenics is it is a lifestyle choice not just a way to get fit.
While it appears that
none of the lawmakers or those who contributed to their campaigns has violated any campaign finance laws, the
question remains: how
does the average voter discern whether or not their elected representative is championing an issue she truly cares about, or if the money associated with that issue — and her prospects for reelection — is what is driving her agenda?
But in
none of the states, Florida included,
does the law provide the sort
of data and transparency needed to answer the
question of how neovoucher students
do academically or the
question of how many students are prompted by the law to attend private school instead
of public school.
Since the Kindle Fire doesn't come with much in the way
of instructions, almost
none really, and there's no physical manual (at least not from Amazon), it's no wonder Kindle Fire owners have all these frequently asked
questions.
I answered «
none» for the degree
of editing
question, but that's not entirely accurate since I am a professional editor and
do it myself.
Unfortunately it is currently lacking a lot
of information (no Nook data, Azardi still a
question mark), and has some incorrect data in the Kindle listings regarding fixed layout that are clearly based on specs rather than actual hands - on testing (i.e. just because the User's Guide doesn't list «orientation - lock:
none» as an option doesn't mean it isn't possible).
But since
none of the usual posters to Joe's blog are Amazon executives, I don't think any
of us will be able to answer your
question about why Amazon doesn't give better information.
When conference attendees were asked to submit
questions ahead
of the event, he said, «Oddly enough, almost
none of the
questions had anything to
do with digital, here at Digital Book World.»
Your
question caught my eye because two
of the agencies keep delaying and delaying the report claiming (1) they need more verification, when
none of my information has changed in over a decade, or, (2) just the other day an agency claimed my SSN doesn't match?
All
of these
questions are important but
none of them will matter if you don't know what you can afford.
I've gotten some great answers, but they're all answers to the
question of what to
do if my income is over the cutoff, and
none of them mention the special case
of my income being just a little over the cutoff.
So my
question is this: since
none of my debt was incurred while married, and since I have not been employed since 2003, and since I
DO very much want to repay my debt, but it pretty much seems completely hopeless, what can I d
DO very much want to repay my debt, but it pretty much seems completely hopeless, what can I
dodo?
So the
question comes down to this:
Do you want all your consumption needs insured in the form
of annuity, or just some or maybe
none of them?
So I think the answer to all these
questions is that the automated system
does none of these things.
Question: My miniChihuahua poop have worms in it first time 4 other small dogs
none have them but have fleas don't have money to buy anything is there home remedies to get rid
of everything
what if your cats not vomiting, but appears to have diarrhea and it seem pasty but he drinks water and doesn't seem to have a loss
of appetite and he seem a little bit sneezy but hes still playfull and not slow paced what could that mean, in addition he eats friskys wet and dry cat food but purrfers the wet food, but its not his usual bm cycle not that i pay much attention in that area just yesterday he was sitting on the kitchen floor and when he got up and moved he left a little size spot on the floor
of what looked like undigested cat food, so i kind
of kept an eye on him scince then and thats what brings me to this
question if i gave him a can
of Vienna sausages the night before could that havr caused it and if so is it temporary because i usually keep him on his diet
of kitty foods but love him so much i like to give him treats now and then, and i had a kitten for about 7 months and she was fine the whole time but one day she layed down and she wouldent get up and i give them medicine for prts from the pharmacy dewormer flea and tick soap but it was within i say half hour from playing to lathargic and in my city the closes vet is 14 miles away
none closer so i went to a vet website and said talk to a vet free but when it came to them giving me advice they wanted a credit card # and $ 35.00 witch i would have given them gladly but i
do nt have a credit card, not even 15 min.after filling 24 min.
Question: I got home from work and I saw my dog not being himself I think he might have ingested some poison he already vomitited but he still seems very weak, I don't know how to help him, I heard activated charcoal or vitamin k pills might work, and
none of the close get clinics are open.
They make people qualify, fill out lots
of paperwork with
questions that sometime are
none of their business and frankly have nothing to
do with weather or not you can take care
of a dog.
Participants will come together to brainstorm the possibilities inherent in the
question «What can we
do together that
none of us can
do alone?»
Of course none of this stops the fun but it does bring in to question other elements of the regional release
Of course
none of this stops the fun but it does bring in to question other elements of the regional release
of this stops the fun but it
does bring in to
question other elements
of the regional release
of the regional releases.
While Zelnick doesn't specifically state that the game in
question is Borderlands 3, he
does rule out sports games entirely, leaving us with only a handful
of options,
none of which have the profile
of the Borderlands series.