Sentences with phrase «none of this argument makes»

None of the arguments made sense anymore.

None of this argument makes sense.

Not exact matches

None of this is to defend Sino - Forest or make an argument that it is simply the hapless victim of short sellers.

Not only did Hume's racism affect his argument, as it was those outside of his white, genteel world who made miracle claims, it left a lasting legacy, as Keener notes that it was explicitly adopted by none other than Kant.

Ken, none of the answers you've listed above make a strong case for / or against supporting the arguments listed.

While the Nazi party and the various ethnic cleansings in Armenia, the Balkans, and Africa were not really based upon atheism (thus making his argument that atheism has killed more folks than organized religion a bit shaky), ALL of the instances he mentions are bona - fide examples of almost incomprehensibly large numbers of deaths, NONE of which can be blamed, even remotely, on «organized religion.»

None of this argument that blames singles makes any sense.

None of the three main parties has stood up and made the only logical argument possible in the face of Ukip's crafty and increasingly well - organised crowd - pleasing: that the greatest problems facing Britain are not caused by excessive immigration, and that an excessive clampdown on people coming in will have thoroughly unwanted consequences.

That makes a scene near the end of the movie, in which the roles of who is seeking acceptance from whom are reversed, feel like an attempt to raise an argument where there is none.

Margaret Atwood's certainly written plenty of stuff that you could make a «subversive» argument for, but none of it's striking me as particularly travel - y off the top of my head.

None of them can make arguments for courses of action that will create jobs as a worthwhile end without dressing it up in green, as a response to a «planetary emergency» — they can't even think of things that the huge number of people who are unemployed could be doing instead of claiming benefits.

None of them even know how to make an argument for conventional energy generation.

I've seen several papers trying to make this argument, and none of them successfully.

None of the companies — BP Plc, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Total SA, Statoil ASA, Eni SpA and BG Group — is based in the U.S. Still, their argument should resonate in Washington: «Clear, stable, long - term» policies that make carbon more expensive (the letter never uses the word «tax») are necessary to reduce uncertainty, stimulate investment and encourage the most efficient reductions in emissions.

None of this is intended to pour water on the arguments made in the debate by those who are focussed on the science.

Of course, it is interesting that many of those same «skeptics» also make contradictory arguments that suggest that they have great certainty about the magnitude of the effect (that it definitely isn't as large as the range estimated by the IPCC), and / or argue that none of the ways that climate scientists have measured the effect are valiOf course, it is interesting that many of those same «skeptics» also make contradictory arguments that suggest that they have great certainty about the magnitude of the effect (that it definitely isn't as large as the range estimated by the IPCC), and / or argue that none of the ways that climate scientists have measured the effect are valiof those same «skeptics» also make contradictory arguments that suggest that they have great certainty about the magnitude of the effect (that it definitely isn't as large as the range estimated by the IPCC), and / or argue that none of the ways that climate scientists have measured the effect are valiof the effect (that it definitely isn't as large as the range estimated by the IPCC), and / or argue that none of the ways that climate scientists have measured the effect are valiof the ways that climate scientists have measured the effect are valid.

He rejected the argument because none of the differences Uber pointed to were legally relevant — the claims the plaintiffs are making (primarily that Uber misclassified them as contractors instead of employees) are pertinent to every member of the class.

The 2015 order was also subject to lawsuits, but none made a dent; in fact, having the courts repeatedly uphold the order is something that has been key to the arguments of net neutrality proponents.