None of this evidence seems to have influenced either the government or the Labour party.
Not exact matches
In every case you pretty much have to want to believe you're looking at «
evidence» to believe what they present is
evidence, as
none of it is conclusive and some
of it
seems downright silly.
Ayesha Pande: My response here is based purely on anecdotal
evidence: It
seems readers
of literary fiction have a bias for print books; many readers tell me they want to keep the books, put them on their shelves, read them again and share them with others —
none of which is possible with an e-book.
Deniers repeatedly ask for empirical
evidence, yet must be failing badly at communicating that this is the crucial point because
none of the esteemed lead authors
of IPCC working Group I
seem to have realized that this paltry point is all that is needed....
None of this should come as a surprise: The paper
seemed to undermine a key piece
of evidence suggesting that we can actually see and measure the consequences
of human - induced climate change.
So far it
seems like
none little
of the
evidence has actually been reviewed.