Sentences with phrase «none of those temperature records»

To make it even more interesting, many «skeptics» also argue that none of the temperature records showing climate change are valid, even as they argue that those same temperature records show a «pause in global warming.»

Not exact matches

None of those factors bias the temperature record.

However, there are only 50 states, and this is a number that isn't large enough to give the best statistical results... [a better metric is a] year - by - year numbers of daily all - time record high temperatures from a set of 970 weather stations with at least 80 years of record... There are 365 opportunities in each year (366 in leap years) for each of the 970 stations to set a record high... Note the several years above 6000 events prior to 1940 and none above 5000 since 1954.

Not only is the data deeply suspect after the U.S. government was repeatedly accused by experts of fudging the temperature record to show warming when none existed, both of the agencies in question have been forced to back down from similar «warmest on record» claims on multiple occasions in the past.

Lets look at the short term CO2 growth rate change due to temperature change and notice that the fudged record does not track growth rate change as well as the charts do here: http://www.biomind.de/realCO2/ When I try to understand why the CO2 levels may have been kept low by the LONG effects of volcanic activity as well as Krakatoa in 1883 I see a VE6 in 1902 and another in 1912 but then none that large until 1991 and I do not remember it being anything like the descriptions of Krakatoa.

-- Muller believes humans are changing climate with CO2 emissions — humans have been responsible for «most» of a 0.4 C warming since 1957, almost none of the warming before then — IPCC is in trouble due to sloppy science, exaggerated predictions; chairman will have to resign — the «Climategate» mails were not «hacked» — they were «leaked» by an insider — due to «hide the decline» deception, Muller will not read any future papers by Michael Mann — there has been no increase in hurricanes or tornadoes due to global warming — automobiles are insignificant in overall picture — China is the major CO2 producer, considerably more than USA today — # 1 priority for China is growth of economy — global warming is not considered important — China CO2 efficiency (GDP per ton CO2) is around one - fourth of USA today, has much room for improvement — China growth will make per capita CO2 emissions at same level as USA today by year 2040 — if it is «not profitable» it is «not sustainable» — US energy future depends on shale gas for automobiles; hydrogen will not be a factor — nor will electric cars, due to high cost — Muller is upbeat on nuclear (this was recorded pre-Fukushima)-- there has been no warming in the USA — Muller was not convinced of Hansen's GISS temperature record; hopes BEST will provide a better record.

None of the recent temperature changes has been at all outside the historical record.

None of the four Tiljander proxies used in Mann08 can be meaningfully calibrated to the instrumental temperature record, the result of progressive contamination of any climate signals during the 19th and 20th centuries by local activities (farming, peat cutting, road building, bridge reconstruction, lake eutrophication).

To me, none of the Tiljander records seem to say much about climate changes (eg temperature or precipitation) going into the LIA.

For the past four years I had a US$ 1,000 wager that backed the proposition that by end of year 2016 there would be a new record high global average temperature — and I offered that wager to many thousands of deniers: none of you clowns would accept the wager.