So, you are saying that that stations with poor microsite (Class 3, 4, 5) DO NOT have significantly higher warming trends than well sited stations (Class 1, 2), or that this is NOT true in all nine geographical areas
of all five data samples or that the odds
of this result having
occurred randomly are NOT vanishingly minuscule or is it your belief that
none of these
things has been inescapably demonstrated?