Sentences with phrase «not over text»
Most people think it's more respectful to do it in person, not over text or social media.
https://www.plannedparenthood.org/ Not exact matches
We say Millennials do not have a «filter» but that has become a benefit in communication in many cases where they share true thoughts over text and on social media.
There isn't much about the new text that's radically different than the initial proposal the FCC released in late April — it still aims to reverse the Title II classification that gives the agency broad authority over internet service providers, and still questions whether rules that ban those ISPs from slowing down or speeding up certain sites for payment are even necessary in the first place.
Not only should you change your passwords at least every 90 days, you should never share password information with anyone (such as a spouse) by email or text, only in person or over the phone.
Today, for example, the software knows that when an image is dominated by blue sky, text can go into that negative space; meanwhile, if it detects a face, copy can not run over it.
The CSC text is a bit technical, but it is also completely unbiased in the sense that it doesn't favour one investment product over another.
I hereby certify: (1) the information provided is true and correct, (2) you are hereby authorized to investigate all bank, credit, and trade references, and said references are hereby authorized to release any requested information to you or your nominee, (3) such authorization shall extend to obtaining personal credit profile in considering this application and subsequently for the purposes of update, renewal or extension of such credit or additional credit and for reviewing or collecting the resulting account, (4) this information may be transmitted by us to you and by you to underwriter (s) for the purpose of granting me credit, either electronically or manually, and that by submitting this application, I take full responsibility for transmission thereof, (5) I am over 18 years of age, (6) I acknowledge my rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, (7) I consent to receive direct mail, faxes, text - messages, and e-mails sent by National Funding and its affiliates for the purposes of transmitting account updates, requests for information and notices, and (8) this request is for business and not for consumer purposes.
I'm a Christian and discovered the Bible, in it's original text, doesn't condemn gay people but that's ALL right - wing fundies are obsessed over.
When God says something before, and you see it happen after, it's not like reading it in the text where it's already happened and you are reading it after it's over.
Arguing in a vacuum over what Jesus would do in 2012 using a 2000 - year - old text is an academic waste of time and an outrage to those who are actually sick and dying right now, even if it is not completely irrelevant.
@Chuckles «Initially you didn't say 1000's of people checked the reliability over the years, you said reproduce» It's not so hard to be given a text and told to replicate it exactly
While we may be smart enough to benefit from the text, maybe it is too much to assume that it doesn't require engaging that intelleigence with some sacrifice over a period of time.
Everybody agrees that errors have crept in over the thousands of years of copying the text, and so what we have now is not inerrant, so why even believe in it?
Since I had, from my initial article, emphasized the element of divine judgment over the nation, quoting the great lines from Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address as my central text, I could not but find such an interpretation abhorrent.
So, for instance, in 17th - century Europe a huge dispute arose over the Hebrew vowel points and accents, which were not originally part of the Old Testament texts but were inserted by the Masorete scribes hundreds of years later.
Not only will this approach allow us to overcome the manipulation which can occur when one arbitrarily chooses one text over another on a given moral problem, but it also respects the very real cultural differences that exist between our age and antiquity.
Considering such texts (and much else) over the past months, I have found myself wondering: has not the Christian religion put far too much emphasis on sin, and far too little on finitude, mortality, creaturehood?
As the author notes in the beginning, this volume is not intended as a homily, but rather as a companion; and like a trusted companion, it does not simply conduct a one - sided soliloquy over history and texts, but behaves dynamically: telling stories, empathizing with human frailty, and anticipating questions.
It is, in particular, the second of evangelicalism's two tenets, i. e., Biblical authority, that sets evangelicals off from their fellow Christians.8 Over against those wanting to make tradition co-normative with Scripture; over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affiOver against those wanting to make tradition co-normative with Scripture; over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affiover against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affiover against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affiover against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affiover against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affiover against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affirms.
Second, since the inherency of evangelical truth in the book is focused on its main claims, it follows that there is much in the text that is «lesser,» not a main claim, but probes and attempts over the generations to carry the main claims to specificity.
First, it is interesting that in the fourth century, the road to Constantinople in 381 is not paved by blunt appeals to church authority but by extensive wrestling over biblical texts and fine - tooling of extra-biblical language (most notably the term «hypostasis») in an attempt to establish which exegetical claims made sense of Scripture as a whole and which fell short.
As for «jihad» itself, not only is the word «jihad» mentioned in several places within the their koran, such as the infamous Sura 9 («Verse of the Sword»), there are over 150 calls to «holy war» AKA «jihad: scattered throughout the entire text of this hateful book..
Not most importantly that since the bible is the most heavily researched book in the history of the world by wide orders of magnitude, scholars have thoroughly examined textual criticism issues such as this, and the Christian can rest assured that: — the bible we have is over 99 % original text — none of the verses under issue affect the Christian message of salvation through faith in the atoning work of Jesus on the cross at all, not even the smallest amouNot most importantly that since the bible is the most heavily researched book in the history of the world by wide orders of magnitude, scholars have thoroughly examined textual criticism issues such as this, and the Christian can rest assured that: — the bible we have is over 99 % original text — none of the verses under issue affect the Christian message of salvation through faith in the atoning work of Jesus on the cross at all, not even the smallest amounot even the smallest amount.
'' — the bible we have is over 99 % original text — none of the verses under issue affect the Christian message of salvation through faith in the atoning work of Jesus on the cross at all, not even the smallest amount.»
In answer tothey not him.There is no place in the book, the Bible, that says the planet is only 6000 years old, it is the word of God, just because the Bible has been misinterpreted by men and women over the years does not make it (the Bible) a work of fiction.The Bible has been proven to be more accurate and unchanged than any other text of antiquity.Case in point Kedorlaomer.
Why not just bite the bullet and look at the texts for what they — the collected writings of a bunch of people over many decades that were never intended to be reconciled.
The conservative justices fall back on this well - worn staple of conservative jurisprudence: that the «right» here can not be found in the text of the Constitution or in any «tradition» marked in the accumulation of cases over the years; and so the Constitution itself can not be the source of any such right that the judges have the authority to pronounce.
I think that we need to make sure that we talk to people, be Christ to people, not hit them over the head with deep theology or shove a list of proof texts under their noses.
not only that — you're just basically ignorant to a wide range of texts published over the last 2 decades on the matter.
The artist can say «oh no it wasn't» but this work is clearly over the line in imagery, context, and text.
If it truly is blood sacrifice that God desires, and this is why God accepted Abel's sacrifice over Cain's, then wouldn't the text have been clearer if it has emphasized the blood of the flock instead of the fat?
I am a Jesus Feminist not only because of Jesus, but also because I believe the seminal texts of the Women's Movement have redemption written all over them — and I think Jesus would approve.
That thinking — I am not saying «religion» but «thinking» — that corpus of texts and ideas that we have sacralized over the years, to the point that departing from them has become almost impossible, is antagonizing the entire world.
Also that women not being as familiar with old Jewish text may not have known specific things which were sometimes referred to In study and therefore to keep the group progressing forward instead of stalled Over explaining text to women the men already knew forward and backward were told to ask at home?
The community over time has judged the vested interests of the texts (for example, J and Luke) to be faithful vehicles for faith and not acts of distortion.
while there is nothing wrong with a Christian owning / running / operating our own business but at none of these places do you find that they are pushing their beliefs on other employees, requiring them to believe the same thing, etc. it's apparent with walmart — a horrible place to shop, employees don't care whether you need help or not & will even run over you while walking & texting on the job or standing around cussing & carrying on in their personal conversations instead of assisting customers.
We can glean much, but not all - certainly not after all the re-writes and self - serving «translations» of ancient texts, real and forged, that have been made by very fallible, very human Popes and monks over the centuries.
Would it not be a good thing to start all over again in trying to understand what it really means when we repeat, again and again, our favourite missionary text, «the Gospel of the Kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the Oikoumene - and attempts to re-think our ecclesiology within this frame work of the kingdom - gospel - Apostolate - world?
Point 1: There are LOTS of things «all over the Bible» It is not a consistent text.
For example, the creation account of Genesis 1 is arguably more meaningful and more profound when we understand it, not as a modern science text, but as an ancient Near Eastern temple text that honors Elohim as ruler over creation.
Systematic exposition can not get over this problem by simply relegating the use of scripture to «proof texts» if it is to be academically respectable.
That this is not really a discourse delivered by Jesus is especially easy to discover from the Marcan text, at the point where a mysterious expression is taken over from The Book of Daniel: «But when you see the abomination of desolation standing where it [or he] ought not, then let the inhabitants of Judea flee to the mountains» (Mark 13:14).
Its imagery and text encompass the idea that fear only grows unless confronted and whatever it is usually isn't worth being frightened over in the first place.
Have a total meltdown over seeing pictures of myself from behind at my friend's wedding, send rantingly threatening texts to another friend begging her to not plan her wedding around one of her bridesmaids being 9 months pregnant (just in case I find myself in those shoes again next time around)...
After a falling out with Blues boss Antonio Conte over a text message that stated he would not be part of the club's plans going forward, the Spain international has remained in native Brazil for the whole of the summer, vowing not to return to Stamford Bridge, so say Sky Sports.
The Spanish international hasn't featured for the Blues this season or even reported back to training after he was informed via text by Antonio Conte over the summer that he no longer formed part of his plans moving forward.
«Last night, I got a three - page text from my good friend Lou Holtz, who must have watched the inaugural and then all that blabber on TV...: «I'm done, finished, the country's over with — we're not doing this again!»
Chelsea rogue Diego Costa has threatened to go on strike over a bust - up with Antonio Conte after the Blues boss told him he wouldn't be part of his seasons plans via text message.
Virtually all of the players had left Cobham by then and they did not receive any official announcement from the club before word spread between team - mates and staff members via telephone, text message and over WhatsApp.
The Spain international returned to homeland Brazil at the start of the summer and remains there after going on «strike», stating his Chelsea days are over after falling out with Blues boss Antonio Conte over text message that explained how he wouldn't be part of the Italian's plans this season.