Sentences with phrase «not terrorist attacks»

There weren't any terrorist attacks for 50 years.

«It wasn't a terrorist attack!

And, because the attack at Fort Hood was an attack on soldiers, this attack, by definition, was not a terrorist attack.

Fortunately for the nation, this was not a terrorist attack.

Not exact matches

In fact, Palestinian officials have acknowledged providing payments to the families of Palestinians killed while carrying out attacks on Israelis or convicted of terrorist acts and imprisoned in Israel; that is not a conspiracy theory.»

«Terrorists are using encrypted communications and... very solid cryptography standards that haven't been broken yet,» David Kennedy, the CEO of TrustedSec, who has worked with the Marine Corps» cyber-warfare unit and the National Security Agency, told Business Insider in November after the Paris attacks.

Comey and his cohorts argued that obtaining the data on the device could aid not only in bringing «justice» to the victims on the deadly December attack, but perhaps also lead the FBI to other alleged terrorists.

Lyman Stone put it bluntly in an article for The Federalist: «Most reasonable people would agree that banning people who have never been associated with any terrorist attack in our country (say, Bhutanese Hindus) doesn't make much sense.»

During an interview on CNN's «The Lead» Jake Tapper called out President Donald Trump for falsely stating that the murder rate is the highest it has been in 47 years, and for saying that the media deliberately didn't cover some terrorist attacks because it didn't serve their agenda.

The company hadn't been around long before the tech bubble burst and the terrorist attacks on September 11 ground markets to a halt.

The motive is not yet known for the attack, though the FBI on Monday contradicted ISIS's claim that it was responsible for the massacre, saying Paddock appeared to have «no connection with an international terrorist group.»

The attacker's motive was unclear, though Hollande said the terrorist nature of the attack «can not be denied.»

And if you back up information but store the duplicated materials onsite or in an adjacent building, as some downtown Manhattan businesses did before the terrorist attacks of September 2001, you won't be any better off in a disaster that affects an entire region.

But while wanting to seem strong in the wake of terrorist attacks is a natural desire for a politician, we shouldn't be so quick to follow Hillary onto the bandwagon.

While terrorist attacks are not a new phenomenon, the report noted their frequency and spread have become more noticeable and prominent of late.

Pinker's extensively researched thesis is that global violence has decreased throughout human history, as wrong as that may feel given the 24 - hour news cycle that came into being not long after two world wars and matured during an age of regular terrorist attacks and mass shootings.

The online survey of 1,019 Canadians asked which federal leader they would prefer to do things with, including serious issues, such as dealing with a terrorist attack, and not - so - serious issues, such as drinking a beer and babysitting.

 Mr. Poloz himself bent over backwards in his last Monetary Policy Report to not use that term — even though the Bank's own numbers (projecting negative GDP growth for both the first and second quarters of 2015) suggested a recession was indeed already underway. Instead, public officials are normally sanguine and rose - coloured in their public pronouncements, hoping to incrementally shift consumer confidence with their cheeriness, and thus spark more spending. [A ridiculous extreme of this approach was provided when George Bush blithely encouraged Americans to go shopping in the days after the 9 - 11 terrorist attacks.]

Islamic community center in New York is that not the center that spawned all the terrorists that did the first world trade center attack??

Terrorists are not, however, attacking Reality — it's the «avoid the crazy man on the bus» thing writ large maybe.

This incident must not be taken lightly, this could be a dry - run for a possible (massive) terrorist attacks.

This matter must not be taken lightly, this could be a dry - run for a possible (massive) terrorists attack (s).

This incident must not be taken lightly, this could be a dry - run for a possible (massive) terrorist attack (s).

To those who argue that Hamze did not condemn: «radical islam» I point to this quote in the article itself: «Terrorists attacked us on 9/11, Mr. West.

When someone calls that Imam one of the most evil people on the planet, when someone says he wants to build his center to train terrorists, when someone calls for amending the constitution to exclude Islam, when someone says our founding fathers wanted this to be a Christian nation and that they didn't want Muslims included, when Muslims are afraid to go out because they will be attacked, when Christian pastors are preaching against Muslims (as opposed to the belief in Islam), THAT is hatred.

Plus, I don't recall any Irish or Jewish terrorists trying to attack American b / c of our freedoms.

the reason why everyone hates muslims is because when a terrorist attack occurs, «moderate» muslims do nt say anything.

We can't see that all those controversial policies developed by the Bush and Blair administrations were not really put forward in good faith as efforts to protect American and British citizens from repeated terrorist attacks.

I'm not suggesting that you don't need to attack brutal terrorists, but you don't destroy the idea by simply killing terrorists, other people simply move into that space.

While watching the CBC's coverage of the Paris terrorist attacks, I was so emotionally struck by the news of Parisians opening their doors to those who couldn't get home because all public transit was shut...

Bombings and explosions were used in 58 % of terrorist attacks in 2012, but it wasn't always this way.

According to the writer, if Obama is elected president, evangelicals can expect «hardship,» «persecution,» and «suffering» in the years to come... not to mention an inevitable surge in terrorist attacks, vandalism at Christian bookstores, and the demise of Boy Scouts of America.

After the terrorist attacks in France and in Germany, it is permissible to observe that this time these lunatics have not killed at random.

Despite the strong public sentiment against such convictions after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon, a perusal of public statements made by the leadership of the historic peace churches clearly indicates that, while they have repeatedly called for the perpetrators to be held accountable, they have not backed away from their commitment to nonviolence.

I think it was a homegrown terrorist attack that was not religious or anti-religious at all, but anti-government.

It is claimed by some that terrorist attacks are not acts of war but crimes to be punished by international tribunals.

and BTW; there are currently over 12 MILLION illegal aliens in the U.S.and more flow in every day, if only.001 % of those illegals are Al Qaeda type terrorists just WHO do you think is here to stop them when they finally attack????? Good luck to Law Enforcement, but I don't think so....

Obama didn't apologize to the terrorists for the attack.

Obama has ramped up drone attacks in Afghanistan that have not only removed terrorists, but killed civilians.

Looking at foxnews and their «analysts» they decry that this man is not a christian but whenever any terror attacks happen where the nut job was a muslim the media in particular right wing media is quick to point out that the terrorist was a muslim, and ask whats wrong with islam and why the islamic community doesn't repudiate the attacks.

And you'd agree that the Muslim world need not denounce those terrorist attacks because they were carried out by a bunch of whackos who just happened to call themselves Muslims but actually weren't.

Your point seems to be that — since he didn't act with the full support and assistance of Christian religious leaders — it follows that Muslim terrorists — who call out to Allah as they attack, and who * DO * have the full support and assistance of certain extremist Muslim leaders — shouldn't be presumed to be acting in the name of Islam.

It is true that you can not prevent a psycho from wreaking huge death and destruction in a terrorist attack.

Yes, it does good charitable deeds around the world but I'm not sure that balances out the scandals of the Catholic church, the Spanish Inquisition, the Holocaust, the fanatic muslim terrorist attacks....

Like it or not, Muslums will always be linked to that terrorist attack, so either live with that fact or move to a country that celebrates the Muslum religion.

«Whilst it is too early to speculate on what the motive behind this attack was I am confident, based on the information currently available to me, that it is not terrorist related.

Of particular note was Crowley stepping into fact check Governor Mitt Romney's statement that President Barack Obama did not call the assault on Benghazi a terrorist attack.

I guess you wouldn't consider all the public shooting massacres to be a terrorist attack then?

That's right... nearly 25 % of our federal budget in the year1800 was used to PAY OFF MUSLIM terrorists so they would not attack and enslave our merchant sea men.

If you can't come to understand the religious motivations for their MUSLIM terrorist attacks, then what do you suggest we do?