Sentences with phrase «nothing in that statement»

Nothing in this statement is incompatible with opposition to the HHS Mandate rightly understood.

Nothing in this statement violates any of the laws of physics.

NOTHING in my statement has anything to do with Pascal's Wager.

(There was nothing in the statement about replacing commercialism with Christ.)

There is nothing in his statement that surprises me and it certainly does not confirm him as a «tax dodger» as so many commentators would have us believe.

Nothing in the statement suggests a change in the rate anytime soon.

(4) In accordance with subsection (2) of this section, nothing in the statement of general principles and measures or measures for regulating the conduct of students shall authorise anything to be done in relation to a student which constitutes harassment, intimidation, the administering of corporal punishment or any other actions harmful to a student.»

Nothing in that statement said that thermal energy / heat was transferred from a colder object like the cold atmosphere to a warmer object

Nothing in the statement of intent however indicates any support for proper scientific openness and fostering of discussion and debate.

Not exact matches

«There is nothing «unusual» about the National Security Advisor memorializing an important discussion for the record,» Ruemmler said in a statement.

In an emailed statement, a Gawker spokesman said that nothing has changed, and that the company has «always said we're exploring contingency plans of various sorts» in case the Hogan judgment is upheld on appeaIn an emailed statement, a Gawker spokesman said that nothing has changed, and that the company has «always said we're exploring contingency plans of various sorts» in case the Hogan judgment is upheld on appeain case the Hogan judgment is upheld on appeal.

«It deserves nothing less than civil disobedience,» the state GOP said in a statement.

If you're thinking in broad, sweeping statements such as «Everything is going wrong» or «Nothing will work out,» then you need to reframe the situation.

«Let us be completely clear,» the company said in a statement, «we had absolutely nothing to do with the creation, listing or distribution of the photo.

For its part, Google hasn't commented on launch plans and only told Droid Life in a statement that «nothing will change for users today» and, if and when a new service is announced, users will have «plenty of notice before any changes are made.»

On Wednesday, Bennett released a statement saying a Las Vegas police officer pointed a gun at him and detained him «for doing nothing more than simply being a black man in the wrong place at the wrong time.»

«Nothing that has happened in the last 48 hours is surprising to me or many others,» Kasich said in a statement.

«The FTC's allegations are baseless and have nothing to do with the substance of our network management program,» Wayne Watts, AT&T senior executive vice president and general counsel, said in a statement.

Again, they found nothing, and in finding nothing, that's a big statement.»

Boeing greeted the news in a statement: «This dispute has nothing to do with limiting innovation or competition, which we welcome.

There was nothing new in their proposed strategy that could not be found in policy statements made by G - 7 leaders, G - 20 leaders, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and most credible Economic think tanks over the past decade.

But Icahn said his decision had nothing to do with Trump blaming that mayhem «on many sides» but instead because he «did not want partisan bickering about my role to in any way cloud your administration,» Icahn said in a statement.

Although it was intended only as a statement on the company's position on the trade deal, and «nothing beyond that issue,» a company spokeswoman said in an email, it became kindling for protests from Trump opponents, some of whom posted videos to social media of their sneakers being set on fire in response.

Nothing about democracy in his statements, it's all about economic freedom pereptrated by the likes of Hayek, Flannigan, Harper and those crazies pushing their propaganda at the Fraser Institute.

What should an advisor who delivers investment - only management and no financial plan, no ongoing service, no guidance, nothing except for an annual statement, online access and a phone number to call in case of questions charge their clients?

So in retrospect that scientist is correct as there is nothing to disprove his statement.

Both of these statements are nothing more than declarations, like so many others often used by Christians, to add the semblance of authority to a belief which in reality has no basis whatsoever.

And your all or nothing statement about Christianity in order to receive the benefits presumes that what you must «totally buy in to» is perfectly correct and without error.

The subtlety of the Second Vatican Council's statement in Nostra Aetate that the «Catholic Church rejects nothing of what is true and holy in [other] religions» has often been missed by Catholics on both sides of the ecclesial aisle.

Whitehead seems aware of this issue He tacitly acknowledges it in the statement, «an abstraction does not mean that an [abstracted] entity is nothing.

It has offered nothing to each of the discussions I have seen it post in, and has NEVER answered the question asked every time, «How has it been proven» nor addressed the statement, «It has actually been proven to not work».

After the interpretation of this parable, Mark and Luke have the saying used by Matthew in the Sermon on the Mount about putting a lamp under a bushel or a bed (Mt 5:15; Mk 4:21; Lk 8:16), followed by the statement, «For there is nothing hid, except to be made manifest; nor is anything secret, except to come to light» (Mk 4:22; Lk 8:17).

There is nothing in the study by International Theological Commission (ITC) that justifies such a statement.

Its technical statement is Whitehead's Ontological Principle: «apart from things that are actual, there is nothing — nothing either in fact or efficacy....

While it canot be said what thoughts reside in Graham's mind, the statement above is nothing more than a presentation of fact.

In a pointed statement he said ``... proving that nothing is sacred - not even fatherhood - the President couldn't resist a shout - out to his homosexual base, marring what should have been a powerful acknowledgment of the family's importance in American life.&raquIn a pointed statement he said ``... proving that nothing is sacred - not even fatherhood - the President couldn't resist a shout - out to his homosexual base, marring what should have been a powerful acknowledgment of the family's importance in American life.&raquin American life.»

But these statements were as nothing compared with the frenzy of the general press in railing against «the religious right» in Republican ranks.

Please cite in auntiekale statement where they claimed there is nothing above or beyond our physical universe.

Yea, bad things happen in some Churches, but to run screaming, I ain't goin to Church no more cause «I am so tired of platitudes and statements by christians that mean absolutely nothing...,» and all the other excuses, well, you pat them on the head, and say, «Oh you poor thing, I feel your pain.

After a year of campus protests, none of us in the seminar — except perhaps the international students — could avoid guilt when someone quoted François's statement that «it may well be impossible for people who have lived and prospered under a given social system to imagine the point of view of those who feel it offers them nothing and who can contemplate its destruction without any particular dismay.»

One, there is nothing in Bill's statement or mindset distancing themselves from the «Believe as we do or you are flawed» mindset of fundamentalism we doubters and nonbelievers supposedly dislike.

In Romans 14 speaking about symbolic acts, Paul makes the remarkable statement that nothing is unclean of itself, only if one thinks it is unclean, is it unclean.

Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani «has done nothing more than maintain his devout faith, which is a universal right for people,» a White House spokesman said in a statement.

Nothing of the above, statements say that we should not defend ourselves, nor does it say that we shouldnt believe in and protect our ways.

Statements like the one Speckhardt offered -(«We feel those (unaffiliated) folks don't yet know they can admit that they don't believe in God,») make humans sound like they are nothing but chimpanzees looking for any «ist» vine to grab on to.

Apart from the fact that Genesis says nothing (even remotely) of the sort, I would not presume to comment on the Psalms, as I have not actually studied them, except to say that I v «aguely recall the translation of the word from Hebrew to the English word «fool» is a corruption of the Hebrew term which actually means (a person who is) «morally deficient», which might cast the statement in the psalm in a slightly different light.

Christian theology, in my conviction, is nothing other than the explication and application of what that statement means.

Take, for example, Paul's statement in 2 Corinthians 6:8 - 10: «As deceivers, vet true; as unknown, and yet well known; as dying, and behold, we live; as chastened, and not killed; as sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, yet possessing all things.»

Calvinists focus on the statements in these verses that a «branch can not bear fruit of itself» and that without Jesus «you can do nothing» and claim that these statement prove that people can not do anything on their own, including believe in Jesus for eternal life.

«I apologize to him and to any I have offended for not better articulating my reason for not supporting him in this election — for his faith has nothing to do with my consideration of him as a candidate,» Graham's statement continued.