Not exact matches
cited growing pressure on
nuclear - disarmament treaties like the Intermediate - Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) and ongoing security concerns in Eastern and Central
nuclear - disarmament
treaties like the Intermediate - Range
Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) and ongoing security concerns in Eastern and Central
Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) and ongoing security concerns in Eastern and Central Europe.
While all the campaigns noted above were developed or at least supported by most European states, the
nuclear ban -
treaty movement marks the first time an instrument of international humanitarian law is
forced into existence against a kicking and screaming European core.
But 44 countries that hold
nuclear technology must both sign and ratify the
treaty for it to have the
force of law.
But wouldn't a ratified
treaty that goes into
force leave the U.S. and other countries that abided by it vulnerable to cheaters that clandestinely develop and test their
nuclear capabilities?
One board member, Sharon Squassoni, of George Washington University's Institute for International Science and Technology Policy, said Russia was also responsible for raising tensions, for example by deploying ground - launched cruise missiles in 2017 in breach of the 1987 Intermediate - range
Nuclear Forces (INF)
treaty.
I believe, though, that the fault, if that's the right word, is not ours but rather belongs to other members of the
nuclear club: the
treaty is to come into
force itself only when all 44 nations who have
nuclear capabilities have ratified it.