Marni Magda Comments: A California Interim Solution Exclusively for California Stranded
Nuclear Spent Fuel
The nuclear spent fuel produced during 14 years of operation at Rancho Seco was kept cool in a water pool on site and is now in protective dry storage.
«US nuclear regulators greatly underestimate potential for nuclear disaster:
Nuclear spent fuel fire could force millions of people to relocate.»
Not exact matches
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A plan to temporarily store tons of
spent fuel from U.S. commercial
nuclear reactors in New Mexico is drawing fire from critics who say the federal government needs to consider more alternatives.
Spent nuclear fuel rods and other waste would be buried 100 feet deep in a buffer zone between the border and the wall.
The Federal
Nuclear Waste Policy Act has mandated that deep - mine disposal of high - level radioactive effluent and spent fuel rods from nuclear reactors commence by 1998, but states with proposed geological sites are screamin
Nuclear Waste Policy Act has mandated that deep - mine disposal of high - level radioactive effluent and
spent fuel rods from
nuclear reactors commence by 1998, but states with proposed geological sites are screamin
nuclear reactors commence by 1998, but states with proposed geological sites are screaming foul.
It is commonly recognized that the radioactivity and extreme toxicity of
nuclear reactor postfission effluent and
spent fuel rods constitute a hazard to human health and safety.
There is currently no approved national repository to begin removing it from temporary
spent fuel pools located on - site at Indian Point and other U.S.
nuclear power plants across the country.
The Indian Point
nuclear power plant has a long history of accidental radioactive leaks and spills:
spent fuel pools at the plant housing toxic
nuclear waste have been leaking since the 1990s; corroded buried pipes have sprung radioactive leaks; tanks have spilled hundreds of gallons radioactively contaminated water; and malfunctioning valves and pumps have leaked radionuclide - laden water.
In the meantime, highly radioactive waste is being stored on - site in
spent fuel pools at each
nuclear plant, with 1500 tons of waste are currently stored at Indian Point.
Federal authorities in May gave approval for a company to truck
spent nuclear fuel over the Peace -LSB-...]
Heath said
nuclear power produces
spent fuel rods which are radioactive and require constant maintenance.
It's not just the locals who have expressed reservations about using the Peace Bridge as a shipping route for
spent nuclear fuel.
Although unrelated to the May approval, the routing of
spent nuclear fuel over the Peace Bridge was a source of concern for state officials in 2000.
A fire in an electrical switch room on Tuesday briefly knocked out cooling for a pool holding
spent nuclear fuel at the Fort Calhoun
nuclear plant outside Omaha, Neb., plant officials said.
Of all the terrible news from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi
nuclear power plant, reports about the
spent fuel storage pool for reactor # 4 may be among the most disconcerting for scientists.
In the U.S., because of a lack of a long - term plan for dealing with such
nuclear waste,
spent -
fuel pools are even more densely packed, making it easier for a meltdown to occur in the event of a loss of water.
«FLEX would provide multiple means of obtaining power and water needed to fulfill the key safety functions of core cooling, containment integrity and
spent -
fuel pool cooling that would preclude damage to
nuclear fuel,» explains Adrian Heymer, executive director of Fukushima regulatory response at NEI.
That said, the
nuclear industry's FLEX approach, would also include additional pumps and hoses to get water to the
spent -
fuel pools, as well as instruments to monitor their condition.
But in the post-Rio world, the environmental risk of
spent nuclear fuel must be weighed against the potential environmental harm of the CO2 produced by burning fossil
fuels.
The nation's 104 reactors generate roughly 800 billion kilowatt - hours a year and contribute about 2,000 tons of
spent nuclear fuel a year.
The issue concerns what to do with radioactive waste after uranium and plutonium have been recovered from
spent nuclear fuel using reprocessing methods such as Plutonium Uranium Redox EXtraction (PUREX).
Japan's
nuclear plant crisis with the radioactivity contamination from
spent fuel pools is likely to put an overdue spotlight on stalemated U.S. policies for managing reactor
fuel, authors of a Massachusetts Institute of Technology report on the
nuclear fuel cycle said yesterday.
The crisis at the
nuclear plant in Japan, due in part to exposed
spent fuel, is forcing U.S. scientists and policymakers to look for safer courses of action
The Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks led to new requirements to safeguard
spent fuel pools at U.S. reactors, but the overall policy toward the
nuclear fuel cycle has been bound up in the fight over the proposed
fuel repository at Nevada's Yucca Mountain, which the Obama administration wants to terminate.
With no permanent waste repository in sight, the
nuclear industry is storing
spent fuel at reactor sites.
Transfers of casks from operating reactors could follow, and the report authors said that would help resolve a long - running court dispute over payments
nuclear plant operators are required to make to the federal government in return for federal storage of the
spent fuel — a bargain the federal government has not kept.
A top U.S.
nuclear regulator has now given a dire assessment of Japan's
nuclear crisis, saying that radiation from uncovered
spent fuel at the Fukushima Daiichi plant could force emergency workers to abandon their fight to prevent meltdowns there
Any future discussion of
nuclear power will have to take a hard look at regulation and safety, in particular the practice of storing
spent nuclear fuel rods on - site
The back end of the
nuclear fuel cycle, mostly
spent fuel rods, often contains fission products that emit beta and gamma radiation, and may contain actinides that emit alpha particles, such as uranium - 234, neptunium - 237, plutonium - 238 and americium - 241, and even sometimes some neutron emitters such as Cf.
The panel recommends that a new federal corporation manage
spent nuclear fuel and employ a «consent - based» approach to finding it a geologic home
The research may eventually help lead to ways to safely dispose of highly radioactive
spent nuclear fuel that is stored now at commercial
nuclear power plants.
It's not just
spent nuclear fuel but all the radioactive waste from a
nuclear power plant that has no place to go
At the end of 2016 Japan had 14,000 tons of
spent nuclear fuel stored at
nuclear power plants, filling about 70 percent of its onsite storage capacity.
As the U.S. makes new plans for disposing of
spent nuclear fuel and other high - level radioactive waste deep underground, geologists are key to identifying safe burial sites and techniques.
Reactor No. 3 at the Fukushima Daiichi station runs on so - called mixed oxide (MOX)
fuel, in which uranium is mixed with other fissile materials such as plutonium from
spent reactor
fuel or from decommissioned
nuclear weapons.
In the United States, about 70,000 metric tons of
spent commercial
nuclear fuel are located at more than 70 sites in 35 states.
Former Energy Secretary Steven Chu during a keynote address at an American Bar Association forum in California last week cast
nuclear power as critical to curbing greenhouse gas emissions despite challenges surrounding
spent fuel.
Shales and other clay - rich (argillaceous) rocks have never been seriously considered for holding America's
spent nuclear fuel, but it is different overseas.
They say enriching uranium at a processing plant poses less risk than handling
spent nuclear fuel, which is highly radioactive, at a reactor.
In the U.S., the plan to use Yucca Mountain in the Nevada desert as a repository for
spent nuclear fuel rods is in limbo, opposed by the Obama administration.
What will
nuclear plants do with all their
spent fuel in the meantime?
Uranium makes up the bulk of the
spent nuclear fuel (around 94 percent); this is unfissioned uranium that has lost most of its uranium 235 and resembles natural uranium (which is just 0.71 percent fissile uranium 235).
An Outdated Strategy Early
nuclear engineers expected that the plutonium in the
spent fuel of thermal reactors would be removed and then used in fast - neutron reactors, called fast breeders because they were designed to produce more plutonium than they consume.
The half - lives (the period in which radioactivity halves) of these atoms range up to tens of thousands of years, a feature that led U.S. government regulators to require that the planned high - level
nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada isolate
spent fuel for over 10,000 years.
Fast reactors can thus minimize the risk that
spent fuel from energy production would be used for weapons production, while providing a unique ability to squeeze the maximum energy out of
nuclear fuel.
And India wants the United States to grant the Indian government the right to reprocess
spent nuclear fuel sourced from the United States.
The
spent fuel produced by
nuclear power plants will emit harmful radiation for hundreds of thousands — even millions — of years.
The NRC analysis found that a fire in a
spent -
fuel pool at an average
nuclear reactor site would cause $ 125 billion in damages, while expedited transfer of
spent fuel to dry casks could reduce radioactive releases from pool fires by 99 percent.
Moreover, the authors suggest that states that provide subsidies to uneconomical
nuclear reactors within their borders could also play a constructive role by making those subsidies available only for plants that agreed to carry out expedited transfer of
spent fuel.