Numerous people argue that ten billion, or even more, can be fed without too much trouble.
Numerous people argue, surprisingly vehemently, that folks who hurry to grab freebies aren't interested in paying for anything — ever.
Not exact matches
First question should always be, it is not just the rational science these
people are
arguing against, it also the
numerous other faiths, many of whom have their own doctrines of how the world started.
Well,
people argue over it, but wherever «Easter» (the name) really came from, there definitely seems to be
numerous connections between the spring equinox, sunrise, new life, spring, bunnies, eggs, fertility rites, and a sex goddess.
I see a lot of
people heaping praise on Welbeck but I'd
argue a player with more awareness would have done better on our
numerous counters.
The state governments, Madison
argues, are closer to the
people and can focus on the welfare of the
people, regulating ordinary affairs such as the lives, liberties, and properties of the
people, as well as the internal order of each state, and should have
numerous undefined powers to do so, while the national government, being bigger and possessing national resources, can bring victory in war, protect the
people's liberty, and maintain peace between the states, and should have clear, few, defined powers to do so, mostly focusing on external objects such as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce and national taxation.
Rather than having
people to murder (though this could be
argued) and an repetitive objective, you control
numerous players through their individual stories which cross cleverly at the end.
O'Keefe
argued that «your identity of record for now is your Twitter handle,» and gave
numerous examples of how he uses
people's Twitter handles to identify them in his own blog posts, give credit to authors and otherwise acknowledge them online.
I have
argued numerous bail reviews to relax the conditions of accused
persons facing assault charges.
It gets some information wrong, but
argues in favor of jury nullification as the last line of defense against unjust laws, citing
numerous cases of
people being arrested for minor offenses.
While there are some
people who will
argue that seniors have no need for life insurance, the truth is that there are
numerous reasons why someone who is in their 50s, 60s, and over should have this type of financial protection.