Which is that if you are
ok with God being able to violate physical laws, you have no business using science to validate ANY aspect of Christianity.
IF I feel or seem properly Christian — whatever that may entail in someone's mind — THEN I am forgiven and
ok with God.
If you are
ok with a God that intentionally inflicts suffering on a devout and loving follower just to prove a point, so be it, the argument is over.
The catholisc and their chief pedophile poop must believe it is some how
ok with their god for grown men (in dresses for cryin» out loud) to bugger their little boys as they keep offering up their own children.
But is online dating
ok with God?
Not exact matches
Then I found out that
God was
ok with me... gay and all.
Ok, even if you don't believe in
God or any religion, morals has a lot to do
with it.
So, if we (along
with many theologians) don't see the love we share
with our partner to have been decreed sinful by
God, then how are we playing
God by saying it is
ok?
So this is what I got from reading this article:
god is all everything but can't or won't stop bad things from happening... he's
ok with suffering and will very generously comfort us from the suffering that he provides, all you have to do to receive this gift of comfort is to live
with the suffering until the day you die.
«Being a form of worship»
OK I agree
with you, but are you seeing yes
God can see and hear
with out it or you mean to say no
God can see or hear
with out is...??
Hitler can burn people alive for minutes until they die, but when
god burns people for an eternity for NOT loving him, that's
ok with you.
That act is
ok with you because your
god did it.
Justina
OK, the «Love the Lord your
God with all your heart...» part covers the first few Commandments and the Golden Rule covers everything from respecting your parents on down, right?
And all this «I'm
ok, you're
ok,» crap in some of so - called Christian communities, will not cut it
with our
God.
Most of them are good people, and,
God being who He is, will be
ok with that, or He is not
God.
And before you offer up the excuse the bible uses that... «Lot was too drunk to know better»... ask yourself if that excuse would fly today in a court of law, if not, don't use it here to justify his behavior, and
god does not punish him so your
god must be
ok with drunken incest.
So Rocky, are you
OK with the clown currently squatting in the Oval Office that worships the monkey -
god?
So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do
with the mentioning of
God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's
ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree
with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.
But what I've always wondered is, if there is an ultimate truth, why doesn't
God stick it smack in our faces, so we can't make these mistakes of whether women can preach and teach men, whether blacks can marry whites, whether slavery is
OK, and whether we can worship
with instruments or not?
«to the ones do not believe in
god when you in tragic situation who do you call on, 911 happen when a republican took whitehouse so you idiots a tragic have not happen yet so prayer does work and you
with all the hate and jealousy you will reap what you sow»
ok, if this is a serious post then my answer is... in a tragic situation I certainly do nt turn to an imaginary being in the sky because that would be pointless.
Is just as important as promoting «We are
OK with «good» people NOT to believing in a
God if that is their choice».
«We are
OK with people believing in a «good»
God if that is their choice».
«
God made me king, so anything I do is
ok with Him.»
The revolutionary, almost subversive, thing about asking is that it goes beyond making it
OK to have secret questions and inner doubts and gives us permission to raise our hands in
God's classroom
with a «Pardon me, but I don't get it.»
Ok Jesus Christ said that no man can see
God with out HIM!!!! So if you donot need Jesus Christ then you must BURN!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm not certain why it is
OK for you to insult people who disagree
with you and then take offense at my casual comment about the misuse of a car and the profession of loving a father being contradictory (comparing it to bringing «
God» into the conversation).
Lastly,
ok so first I'm sorry, I don't mean to offend, but you... commune
with god?
And to get them to accept the gay lifestyle as some sort of
God ordained behavior, implying that maybe even Jesus was
OK with queers and accepted their sexual behavior without regard to condemnation or judgement.
Ok, so first off, I think in terms of proof, the only thing that would justify as proof to me would be direct contact
with a «
god being», but even then a lot of questioning and experimentation would be needed to rule out other possibilities.
I'm confused, you agree
with everyone that you can't prove a negative, but you feel it's
ok to ask, «Prove there is no evidence of
God.»
I am
ok with saying maybe
God, or a god, created life, the earth, and the universe; nothing wrong with speculation and imaginati
God, or a
god, created life, the earth, and the universe; nothing wrong with speculation and imaginati
god, created life, the earth, and the universe; nothing wrong
with speculation and imagination.
I am
OK with people thinking the universe had a beginning and that life has shown variation as long as they admit that science does not know how life started on earth, and they admit that
God might have created life on earth.
So I'm fine
with those that say
God caused the Big Bang and started and guided evolution, so long as they are
ok with those events occuring.
Since gays are allowed to marry now it seems to me that means it is
OK with Jesus and / or
God that women munch rug and men pile drive the Hershey Highway.
But, it's a religious world and religious people are
ok with putting
god above cures.
How can you respond to that line when people use it; it's like throwing the gauntlet down, ou either have to say «
ok» and go
with them on whatever they want; or you have to say «No, I don't think
God actually told you that.»
Hi, I have a problem
with God...
Ok, have you seen the stars lately.
What I don't believe is that he was a
god and that his death was all part of some plan to make himself feel
OK with allowing people into heaven.
Since
god created satan, knowing full well the consequences,
god must be
ok with anything satan has done, or will do.
I recall being invited out for dinner
with brothers, and thinking (silently between myself and
God), «Lord I don't have any money, but I'm hungry» and then someone would say «hey rod I'll buy
ok?»
On issues such as women in church leadership, and other religions, we are free to come to a «developed, or even different, view» from what we find in the canon, just like William Wilberforce did
with slavery; but that is
ok, because the word of
God is «ultimately a person, not a manuscript».
I'm
ok with the cross being in the museum, since there are so many people — deluded though they are, since there is no
god — who drew some solace from it during a terrible time.
Sure there was a lot of that going on... but that doesn't mean
God is
OK with it.
By this logic — it also states that religious nuts are nothing but tools of society, they have been given the slack of its
ok, now they hung themselves
with gods will / divine plan — equals in religious eyes — can do no wrong or just repent for the act later on and its still
ok!
He makes a similar argument to yours that it is
ok to slaughter even infants and children, if that is what your
god wants in cases where he doesn't want do do the terrible deeds himself, as he did when he supposedly wiped out almost all of humanity
with a flood or sent a plague to kill 70,000 Israelites (2 Samuel 24:1 - 15), because David conducted a census, Yahweh caused him to conduct.
Another preacher preaching what ever goes is
ok with Christianity... If your going to preach Christianity based on the Bible, then you might as well forget gay marriages are
ok... If you want to twist it around then thats up to you... Paul said, «The Berens were of noble charachter because they didn't believe what they heard, but they took what they heard and confirmed it
with the Bible... So its like the Yen or Yang... Its either
Gods church or Satans Church... Can't be any other way... Do I hate gays, no... I have some very close friends that I have had for over 30 years that are gay, but I think they will be accountable for their life styles... Thats the thing about Christianity, we are held accountable, its not an everything goes belief... Its rules we have to follow... And rules we will be held accountable... So maybe this preacher needs to start a dfferent faith or religion... One where there are no rules and where its people are not accountable for their actions...
This was so not because my wife wanted them to be, and not because I had decided it was
OK, but because
God had made a covenant
with the people of Israel.
God didn't orchestrate for you and the person you thought you'd end up
with to be together and that is perfectly
OK.
The way I engaged
with that was to say «
OK so I am supposed to do what you say
God would have me do then» said confidently, calmly and assertively, it resulted in a verbal ju jitsu
with using the other person's strength against them.
ok totally taking a different track here
with the whole «
god» thing.