Sentences with phrase «ot book»

If anyone has ever read Song of Solmon (OT book) I don't see how they could say that God (and Christians) dislike sex.

People, there is also much that has to be discerned about the book of remembrance, the so called OT, and this NT, that I call the (Not True), book, for it does not fulfilled the OT book, it changes the laws of life, and is why we today have so much confusion of what is right, and of what is wrong, as prophesied in Isaiah 24:1 - 5, and YHWH says, He changes not in Malachi 3:6.

Cindi, There is also much that has to be discerned about the book of remembrance, the so called OT, and this NT, that I call the (Not True), book, for it does not fulfilled the OT book, it changes the laws of life, as prophesied in Isaiah 24:1 - 5, and YHWH says He changes not in Malachi 3:6, and He also teaches us in this book that He does nothing without His servants the prophets, in Amos 3:7, so that we are not consumed, (lied to).

In the OT Book of Hosea He tells us that we perish for lack of knowledge.

You know most people don't realize, but there used to be another OT book just after Jeremiah.

By the way, I agree with your comment on jc knowing the prophecies, and the NT being written, around 200bce, 1st, and 2nd centuries to «seem» to coincide with the OT books, is exactly what the jewish writers did not realistically (jc) compared jc to horus, and isis the zodiac sun gods (Egyptian stuff), but they the hellenistic jewish writers twisted a few things, changing the OT, adding, and taking away, which was warned to us not to do in Deut.4: 1 - 4, but these are YHWH enemies taught in Psalms 83.

By the way, I agree with your comment on jc knowing the prophecies, and the NT being written, around 200bce, 1st, and 2nd centuries to «seem» to coincide with the OT books,

There are copies of some of the oldest versions of the Old / New Testaments (some OT books and some NT were later taken out about + -1500 years ago, which didn't help me at all in my search.

Not exact matches

Vic has insisted on dumping bible bile on us today by the truckload, so it's time to take a look at what is really in his Christian book of nasty, from both OT and NT:

The Bible (OT) is a book which includes * some * history of primitive Hebrew culture, and * some * good advice for practical, beneficial human behavior, but mostly it is a compilation of ancient Middle Eastern historical fiction, myth, legend, superst.ition and fantasy.

The Book of Daniel in OT says the same thing as Revelation.

The Book of Hosea in the OT reveals this same Divine perspective that Jesus» testimony about his Father reveals, a God of Unconditional Love & Mercy who always keeps his covenant with us even when we fail fulfill our obligations to God.

yes much has to be discerned in the book of remembrance, so called OT, for the priest did all go astray from the ways of YHWH, but one must read, pray, and do the righteous ways of YHWH to get His anointment to understand, and call 1-773-874-0325, YHWH Our Righteousness, the Movement, and arm, and Branch of YHWH, prophesied in Jeremiah 23 vs. 1 - 8, and Jeremiah 33 vs. 14 - 21, also as described in Isaiah 59, and Malachi 3 vs.1 - 4, to get any answers to any questions about this book.

I will give you full credit that if you ignore revalations, the NT is probably the best of the Abrahamic books, but they refuse to denounce the absurd / violent / awful parts of the OT that it's «foudned» on, and that casts a bad light.

There is widespread agreement with the view presented in the article on homosexuality in Baker's Dictionary of Christian Ethics (edited by Carl F. Henry [Baker Book House, 1973]-RRB-, which declares that «those who base their faith on the OT and NT documents can not doubt that their strong prohibitions of homosexual behavior make homosexuality a direct transgression of God's law.»

The Koran, OT, NT etc. are simply books written by humans for humans.

We were discussing a particular book in the OT which will forevermore be known to us as «Snog of snogs».

The four Gospels are transitional books between the OT and NT.

I'll try to relax and think of some of the other verses that they had in the that book of Fermentations that used to come after Lamentations before they took it out of the OT.

I thought the same thing, and upon reading the whole thing, i learned that this was a book about the OT law, and also priests, as well as the account of the festival calenders and the main heritage story of prophetic foreshadowing of the New Covenant, a better covenant.

What I meant above is that I might give up on the book project in which I explain the violent portrayals of God in the OT in light of Jesus Christ.

In the book's concluding chapter, Hays totals the «strengths and weaknesses» of the evangelists as OT readers and outlines briefly a set of ten methodological prescriptions gleaned from the early chapters.

Without referring to links or someone's book on the subject, Russ, try address one point of fulfillment of OT that we can trace in the NT without running into writings of unknown authorship.

Jesus said let them come to me.Those children killed in these OT scriptures are saved from growing up in an evil society (God said they were were evil and a bad influence on His children) The book of Revelation is about God pleading with mankind to find Him.

The dates for all the following major events can be estimated from the other books in the OT up to the time of Christ.

p - z, since you are referencing the Christian book of nasty, AKA the bible, let's take a closer look at the horrors of that book, in both OT and NT:

the bible orders women to marry their rapist in the OT (Deut 22:28) then god changed its mind - you REALLY trust such a book to be the word of god?

The * oldest * that the OT Bible writings are estimated to be is between 1446 BCE and 1406 BCE (Torah), with the remaining books composed between 1400 BCE to 400 BCE.

Careful with that OT stuff, you know there are several things in there where «you» should be kil - led if you are not doing it what it says or or doing it and you shouldn't be... (according the your book).

I, personally, ain't got what it takes to explain the OT to you, but there is a wonderful book out there that might address a LOT of your questions.

Specific basic rules of being a good human can be found in the OT and NT but such rules were borrowed / plagiarized from the likes of Hammurabi and the Egyptians» Book of the Dead.

Whatever we may think of the OT or the book of Revelation, we know that as followers of Jesus, we need to look like Him.

As with the two - volume work, although I agree with nearly everything Greg writes in the book, I once again found myself disagreeing with the central idea... that God withdraws from Jesus on the cross, and therefore, in the violent portions of the OT, God is withdrawing Himself from the people and nations who experience / suffer violence.

And then, if you disagree with my interpretation re the OT and NT, ask yourself how it is that your «god» couldn't come up with a better way to communicate than a book that is so readily subject to so many interpretations and to being taken «out of context», and has so many mistakes in it.

Genesis to Revelations twice, study course that paired readings from OT and NT to get through the whole book in a year once.

Do you even read this book of remembrance, the so call Ot, in Malachi 3v16, before you make a comment, or have you just learned from that Nt not true book, how to just «believe» anything, and not «know» its truth?

As I prayed and thought, I remembered Job (that I obviously didn't like for your same reasons) and thought — as it's considered the oldest book of the bible, could it be a parable of warning from God that satan would corrupt the OT for people to believe that God is not just?

yeahright, where does it say that confessing in the name of jc is written by YHWH in the book of remembrance, given to us by YHWH in Malachi 3v16, the so called OT?

His Israel of God in Prophecy and Chariots of Salvation are two books that stick particularly to the Bible In both books he remains true to an exegesis that is rooted in the OT and NT Scriptures making it possible for the Christian to understand what has otherwise been an eschatological landscape filled with clouds of personal prognostications that masquerade as Biblical.

I read Peter Enn's book «The Bible tells me so» which helped me sort out some OT issues but his NT examples seemed more «spin» than un-biased reading.

But since Christ taught the OT as true, we get those books thrown in, too.

I was talking about how the BOOKS of the OT that wrere found in the caves were SHOWINH how consistent the BOOKS we have today are in what they SAY!

p.s. taught in Ezekiel 14:14 - 20, Jeremiah 31:30, and in Deuteronomy 24:16, «no man can die for another man's sins, we ae all responsible for our own righteousness» So now tell me why would the Almighty YHWH say this through His true prophets from Genesis - Malachi the book of remembrance named in Malachi 3:16, the so called OT; then turn around and say that anyone, or jc died for our sins, rationalize people, YHWH is not contrary He does it all Deuteronomy 32:39, and Isaiah 44:24 alone, He is the Holy One taught in Isaiah 43:3,15, and Isaiah 43:13, «No man can be delivered from out of His hands».

Then you have many books in the OT telling us that we have been mislead by this NT all by the priest, pastors, popes, and elders, all confirmed in Ezekiel 34.

Although, one must also discern this book of course, of the rewriting, mixing the truth, with lies, that all began in 200bce, by the Alexandrian, Roman Jewish writers, «look it up» making the book an OT, the obvious truth, and a NT, not true, as taught in Micah 7.

Analogous rules were written before the OT by King Hammurabi of Babylon and by the Egyptians i.e. the Book of the Dead.

Bob, georgia, and ttwp, nowhere in the so called OT, (the obvious truth book), and truly was named by YHWH, «the book of remembrance» in Malachi 3v16, does it say jesus, nor does it tell of his story, and in all of those scriptures in the chapters that are in Isaiah 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44, are speaking of the servant, the elect, from the «seed» of David, as the future prophecy in Jeremiah 23 vs.1 - 8, and Jeremiah 33 vs.14 - 21 of the righteous BRANCH, named «The Lord (YHWH) Our Righteousness», and not just one person here, and again there is no name of jc here either, and this is taught to us, in Jeremiah 33 vs. 22 that there will be a great number of David's seed to be on the throne.

Thanks guys for all of your concerns of my post, gosh such love from you, this feels like family, well I guess people here are not that bad at all, now that that's said, I know some of you will resume the ridicule, but being one with the Creator YHWH is the only way from the truth, and righteousness that He left for us in the book of remembrance, the so called OT, the obvious truth, from Genesis - Malachi, the last prophet until this day.

Smithsonian, this is where you are wrong, the book of remembrance, the so called OT, is not a religion, YHWH is not of religion, or Daniel's vision would not have prophesied just what is going on in this time of false religions, and false governments, and those like yourself are suppose to mislead the people this is what this whole spiritual war, of His enemies in Pslams 83, and in Exodus 17:14 - 17, from generation, to generation, it is about the lies of the leaders against YHWH, who has been told, and warned by YHWH, that your knowledge has deceived you, in Isaiah 47, O, daughter of Babylon.

Saying that there is no Creator YHWH, is like saying that there was never a Nebuchadnezzar, no Solomon, no David, and that there was no Cyrus the Great the Persian, all who are wrote into our own world history, as well as in this book of remembrance, the so called OT, also called the bible.