Sentences with phrase «ot which»

I just feel terrible because he is just more and more OT which is hard on a 7 week old baby.

4) Blandisi was the Devils best forward, even with the mistake he made in OT which caused the loss.

It is basically this characteristic tradition in the Old Testament Wisdom Literature and other parts of the OT which we refer to as the «Wisdom Tradition».

There are Christian fundamentalists in congress, who believe global warming is not real because God said something in the OT which makes them think it's not real.

Russ, you have done an excellent job in pointing out God's Judgment and Mercy in the OT which Mr. Baden PURPOSELY failed to do.

We were discussing a particular book in the OT which will forevermore be known to us as «Snog of snogs».

Not exact matches

The funding, which has come in over the last year, has been used in part to get Opentrons» new robot, the OT - 2, developed, along with now launching the product.

Vandersluys tells OT that a Business Center in Brisbane is in the works, and that their goal is to expand all across Australia by opening several Business Lounges in different areas — the first of which he mentioned will be located in Sydney.

Steve Golding, Executive Director of Alliance for the ASEA region, told OT that, «APSO is at the forefront of the industry as they begin to roll out their Business Lounge solution, which is ideal for entrepreneurs, start - ups, or the established road warrior.

There are other stories like that in OT — Job, Jonah which goes into surealistic premises.

Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul of Tarsus (and Jesus, whoever he really was) and the rest of the first century evangelists read the OT Bible, as did the later church officials who decided which works to include in the compilation of the Bible.

The Bible (OT) is a book which includes * some * history of primitive Hebrew culture, and * some * good advice for practical, beneficial human behavior, but mostly it is a compilation of ancient Middle Eastern historical fiction, myth, legend, superst.ition and fantasy.

Some of you questioned god's morality based on some verses in OT, which described disturbing happenings in the old, BC history.

The OT Hebrews recognized that God was essentially unknowable, which is why they could not name [define] God as we can most creaturely things.

There is widespread agreement with the view presented in the article on homosexuality in Baker's Dictionary of Christian Ethics (edited by Carl F. Henry [Baker Book House, 1973]-RRB-, which declares that «those who base their faith on the OT and NT documents can not doubt that their strong prohibitions of homosexual behavior make homosexuality a direct transgression of God's law.»

Of course I'm probably thinking of OT verses which could be metaphorical in nature — who knows if any of it literally happened?

This mysterious Gospel reading is punctuated by references which, taken together and with the OT as background, point to the presence of God.

This last phrase is one which is found many times in the OT spoken by God.

I guess the confusion for me is that «sexual immorality,» as far as the NT audience was concerned, referred back to the sexual sins outlined in the OT law, and it seems like sleeping with one's father's wife would be on par with homosexuality, which is included in the same set of «sexually immoral» sins.

All theists decide for themselves which rules to follow and which to ignore or treat as parable or allegory from the OT & NT or there wouldn't be thousands of flavors of xtianity muchless thousands of other religions.

Third, I think the discussion was centered around Genesis, or the OT, which is not known to be «unchanged» by any streatch of the imagination.

Having come back to this, I'm amazed at the logic used by people to continue extremely hateful rhetoric and action — which I must argue signifies that they worship the OT depiction of God (read that carefully because I am making an accusation here) rather than God

What I meant above is that I might give up on the book project in which I explain the violent portrayals of God in the OT in light of Jesus Christ.

Both the OT and the NT make provisions for forgiveness, which is indeed the mercy we are talking about.

The story of Noah was ripped off of Babylon's Gilgamesh, which was WRITTEN DOWN as early as 2150 BS (see Wikipedia) whereas the Jews only wrote down the OT between 10 and 5 BC.

All people are ultimately saved by Jesus and His work on the cross, but during the time of the OT they were not saved by Jesus» work on the cross because it had not yet occurred and because to be saved by Jesus» work on the cross you have to believe in Jesus and His death and resurrection on your behalf which those in the OT were not aware of.

Which OT verse was it that says the govt should tax people more to give to the rich.

There are many similar verses (for example the verse «it is not what goes into a man's mouth that defiles him, but rather what comes out» which shows that the deitary laws of the OT no longer apply in the age of grace) that tell us which parts of the rules in the OT no longer apply in the age of grace.

The OT was established by Jews, not by Christians, so voting on it would be to solidify that which already existed and that is precisely what was done with the New Testament as well.

He founds his argument on two OT passages to which he brings all the skill of expert Jewish rabbinic exegesis.

The only reason most have empowered and spread in number is because ot protestants or those related to protestants which shows protestants is a fake religion because it teachings are false.

There are many similar verses (for example the verse «it is not what goes into a man's mouth that defiles him, but rather what comes out» which shows that the deitary laws of the OT no longer apply in the age of grace) that tell us which parts of the rules in the OT no longer applicable.

The only reason most have empowered is becaus ot protestants or related to protestants which shows protestants is a fake religion because it teaching are false.

First he introduces hell which doesn't exist in the OT.

And just because there are gruesome stories in the OT, (which are not prescriptive), does not mean that we can willy - nilly throw out things in NT and OT to our own liking, even if they are very clear and full of direction.

Yes, the OT law, outside of the moral law, which also «infidels» or all of us in various measure have in their heart, is gone.

But Jesus was more accepting of women, children, aliens, beggars, leppers and even sexual minorities than OT practice, which I think represents a greater inclusiveness which should lead us to believe that love / protection /» rights» be extended to these vulnerable groups and not just the priveledge adult male population.

I read Peter Enn's book «The Bible tells me so» which helped me sort out some OT issues but his NT examples seemed more «spin» than un-biased reading.

It means leaving the privacy ot your solitary labors, moving beyond those expected work relationships in which the product is always the go - between, and saying or doing something about the human affairs — the public realm — of that organization or community of which you are a part.

Comparing the OT and the NT, we see that the Old Covenant was a covenant «in the flesh» (circumcision) whose members should have lived a righteous life on earth according to the (tangible) Law, whereas the New Covenant is a covenant «in the Spirit» whose members receive the power of the Holy Spirit to really live a righteous life according to the Law of Christ which is written on their hearts that have been circumcised as well.

To get a gauge of just how inane that comment is, here are some areas fundamentalists must ignore, any one of which proves beyond rational argument that, not surprisingly, the World did n ¬ ot start about 6,000 years ago at the behest of the Judeo - Christian god.

they all say same thing pretty much... got to remember we can not fully trust 100 percent all translations... which is why one needs to study properly by using Koine Greek (for NT) dictionaries and concordances... and Hebrew dictionaries for OT... when one realizes how the versions are trnalated they will see this... also... thuis is true of ANY piece of literature... have you ever studied and spoken another r language?

It means the absolute master and owner of any person or thing, it is the word used for the Roman Emperor; it is the word which in the Greek OT is used to translate the name of God.

By the way, I agree with your comment on jc knowing the prophecies, and the NT being written, around 200bce, 1st, and 2nd centuries to «seem» to coincide with the OT books, is exactly what the jewish writers did not realistically (jc) compared jc to horus, and isis the zodiac sun gods (Egyptian stuff), but they the hellenistic jewish writers twisted a few things, changing the OT, adding, and taking away, which was warned to us not to do in Deut.4: 1 - 4, but these are YHWH enemies taught in Psalms 83.

It was like that OT commandment of loving the Lord your God and to love thy neighbor (which both used agape and not phillia) was a loaded commandment!

The power of religious nationalism, the revival ot the ancient faiths, the fluid shell of a social culture which can not be penetrated by the arrival of «another religion» or by attempts to replace something old with something new — we knew these barricades are there.

is exactly what the jewish writers did not realistically (jc) compared jc to horus, and isis the zodiac sun gods (Egyptian stuff), but they the hellenistic jewish writers twisted a few things, changing the OT, adding, and taking away, which was warned to us not to do in Deut.4: 1 - 4, but these are YHWH enemies taught in Psalms 83.

As a result, he concludes that the fragmentary nature of experiences require an interrelated context from which they can derive meaning (OT 217).

It now appears clear, however, that the distance that separates Childs from his historical - critical forebears is not so great as that which separates him from more recent readings of the OT, whether literary, neomidrashic, formalist, artifactual, New Critical or deconstructionist.

The OT is made of the Law of Moses, which includes Leviticus and the Law of God, mostly the ten commandments.