The question wasn't about historical facts, it was about whether or not
objective morality actually exists.
Or that such a thing as your concept of
Objective Morality actually exists.
Not exact matches
Since you base your
morality on gods scale, you are blinded and not
objective when
actually judging gods actions.
This leads to a claim of
objective morality, where none
actually exists.
But it can hardly be doubted that such a state of
actually invincible error in moral questions exists also in society or in social groups in which the individual participates, so that his power of moral discernment does not go beyond a certain point, which, through no fault of his own, falls below
objective morality.
Actually if one is claiming that there can not be
objective morality without god it is relevant.
The
morality system can affect the
objectives of your missions, to the point that your co-op buddy can
actually become your in - game nemesis if each player's
moralities are too divergent.
But this is
actually the very «logic» used to confuse the muddled masses, including the majority of default progressives who comment here, to abandon any sense of
objective morality.