Not exact matches
What I'm
simply stating is that if you can offer a plausible argument for how «
objective beauty» or «
objective love» can or should be defined, then I'll be able to better understand your argument for «
objective morality.»
First, if a god commands that something is so, merely because it tickles his fancy, then it is «
objective»
morality simply because everyone and every thing must follow it.
To equate
morality solely with well - being does not make it
objective; it
simply assumes this is the case.
«Since the atheist does not believe in
objective «right» or «wrong» (received divinely) but that
morality is
simply the product of culture and genetics - It is fascinating to see how angry they become at rulings like this... almost as if they believed the ruling objectively «wrong» (divinely received) or something...»
which could
simply mean that to debate with him we would
simply have to accept the existence of an
objective morality; we wouldn't necessarily need to accept his specific definition of that
objective morality.