Objectivist theory attempts to define our fundamental understanding of value, and seperates it from a judeo - christian tradition.
Not exact matches
An
objectivist view that sees the nature of reality writ large in the universe and waiting to be discovered by the human mind, that claims
theories are exact replicas of reality, is typical of naive realism.
The article explores the consequences for legal
theory and practice of the shift from an
objectivist to a constructivist approach to human knowledge, using an expanded, multidisciplinary understanding of rhetoric to analyze the elusiveness of evidentiary truth and the nature and ethics of persuasion in the digital era.
While Gestalt thinking about field
theory has a tremendous amount to offer other psychological disciplines in softening their overly dualistic /
objectivist / mechanistic perspectives, if it goes too far, it will fail to find «common ground», simply argue for one «side» of a duality over another, and stay on the outside, looking in with mutual judgment and rejection.