Observed Sea Level Pressure The atmospheric sea level pressure observation (hectopascals) 4.
For stations of type 181, you may get both the Observed Surface Pressure and
the Observed Sea Level Pressure.
Not exact matches
At a
pressure of circa 2.5 Giga - Pascal (GPa), more than 25,000 times the average
pressure at
sea level, and a temperature of 200 degrees Celsius, the super-hydrated phase was
observed.
Here we analyze a series of climate model experiments along with observational data to show that the recent warming trend in Atlantic
sea surface temperature and the corresponding trans - basin displacements of the main atmospheric
pressure centers were key drivers of the
observed Walker circulation intensification, eastern Pacific cooling, North American rainfall trends and western Pacific
sea -
level rise.
[1] http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v441/n7089/abs/nature04744.html Vecchi et al «
Observed Indo - Pacific
sea level pressure reveals a weakening of the Walker circulation.
Canadian Ice Service, 4.7, Multiple Methods As with CIS contributions in June 2009, 2010, and 2011, the 2012 forecast was derived using a combination of three methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on
observed end - of - winter arctic ice thicknesses and extents, as well as an examination of Surface Air Temperature (SAT),
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and
sea ice predicto
sea ice predictors.
Canadian Ice Service, 4.7 (+ / - 0.2), Heuristic / Statistical (same as June) The 2015 forecast was derived by considering a combination of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on
observed end - of - winter Arctic ice thickness extents, as well as winter Surface Air Temperature,
Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September
sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and
sea ice predicto
sea ice predictors.
[2] Bhend J, Whetton P (2013) Consistency of simulated and
observed regional changes in temperature,
sea level pressure and precipitation.
Canadian Ice Service; 5.0; Statistical As with Canadian Ice Service (CIS) contributions in June 2009 and June 2010, the 2011 forecast was derived using a combination of three methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on
observed end - of - winter Arctic Multi-Year Ice (MYI) extents, as well as an examination of Surface Air Temperature (SAT),
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere, and sea ice predicto
Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere, and
sea ice predicto
sea ice predictors.
Canadian Ice Service, 4.7 (± 0.2), Heuristic / Statistical (same as June) The 2015 forecast was derived by considering a combination of methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on
observed end - of - winter Arctic ice thickness extents, as well as winter Surface Air Temperature,
Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
Sea Level Pressure and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) a simple statistical method, Optimal Filtering Based Model (OFBM), that uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate the September
sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predicto
sea ice extent timeseries into the future and 3) a Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and
sea ice predicto
sea ice predictors.
So, the 3 types are all relative to mean
sea level except «
Observed Surface
Pressure» in type 181.
The H5ftotxt is outputting the
Observed Pressure, you are correct that the NCEP Type will tell you if this is
Sea Level Pressure (ship observations) or Surface
Pressure (station observations).
In no case is the column for
Observed Surface
Pressure reduced to
sea level.
TYPE 183 and TYPE 180 : relative to mean
sea level TYPE 181 : «Observed Sea Level Press» is corrected and «Observed Surface Pressure» is not correct
sea level TYPE 181 : «Observed Sea Level Press» is corrected and «Observed Surface Pressure» is not corre
level TYPE 181 : «
Observed Sea Level Press» is corrected and «Observed Surface Pressure» is not correct
Sea Level Press» is corrected and «Observed Surface Pressure» is not corre
Level Press» is corrected and «
Observed Surface
Pressure» is not corrected.
In the past, about 15 years, there is an
observed change in the atmosphere of the Arctic
sea -
level pressure (see previous blog).
Gillett et al. (2003) compared
observed changes in
sea level pressure with those predicted by four coupled ocean — atmosphere climate models and concluded as follows.
«SEAFRAME gauges not only measure
sea level by two independent means, but also
observe a number of «ancillary» variables - atmospheric
pressure, air and water temperatures, wind speed and direction.
As discussed in the July Outlook, low
sea level pressure (SLP) dominated the Arctic Ocean in July, leading to ice divergence and cooler temperatures that helped to slow the fast pace of ice loss
observed in May and June.