Sentences with phrase «on order of the court»

The Federal Executive Council thereafter endorsed the proscription after which it was published in the Federal Government's gazette on the order of the court.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED.

Not exact matches

Gawker began a court - ordered auction of its business on Monday after losing a $ 140 - million court case earlier this year involving former wrestler Hulk Hogan, who sued Gawker for invasion of privacy after it published a clip from a sex tape he made with a friend's wife.
The group of businesses — which also includes Twitter, Uber, and SpaceX — said the new order would inflict «substantial harm on U.S. companies, their employees, and the entire country,» in a brief filed in the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Still, experts said those comments were likely to hurt the government's case in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which heard arguments on Tuesday night over whether the TRO should be upheld while the order's legality is established.
Apple (aapl) is fighting a court order obtained by the FBI last month that requires the company to write new software to disable the passcode protections on a work iPhone used by Rizwan Farook, one of the two shooters in a December rampage that left 14 dead and 22 wounded.
If Trump's past comments about a ban on Muslims don't weigh heavily on the judges» perceptions of his motivations, the speed with which the order was drafted and rolled out — largely bypassing the government's traditional national - security apparatus — and the extent to which it has been altered since may give courts reason enough to wonder whether an «ulterior motive» was at play, Stock said.
In a complaint filed on Tuesday in San Francisco, Jeffrey Berns asked the court to quash a subpoena that orders Coinbase to turn over the names and account information of all of its customers.
The presidential order imposed a temporary ban on travelers from seven predominantly Muslim countries, but a federal judge has barred enforcement of the order while the court considers a challenge brought by Washington state.
The case being led by Texas and filed at the Federal Court in the Southern District of Texas said the executive order announced by Obama last month violated constitutional limits on presidential powers.
A majority of the judges on a federal appeals court seemed skeptical of the government's defense for President Donald Trump's executive order restricting travel, during courtroom arguments Monday.
DUBLIN, May 2 - Ireland's High Court refused a request by Facebook to delay a referral of a landmark privacy case to Europe's top court on Wednesday, ordering its immediate refeCourt refused a request by Facebook to delay a referral of a landmark privacy case to Europe's top court on Wednesday, ordering its immediate refecourt on Wednesday, ordering its immediate referral.
On March 1, 2017, a court ordered the liquidation of Penn Treaty which triggered assessments from the state guaranty associations.
On Sunday and Monday, 127 Bay Area companies filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit stating their opposition against the president's executive order on immigratioOn Sunday and Monday, 127 Bay Area companies filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit stating their opposition against the president's executive order on immigratioon immigration.
The legislative push come against a backdrop of the expanding legalization of same - sex marriage, which is now allowed in 36 states and in limbo in a 37th — Alabama, where there have been contradicting state and federal court orders on the matter.
The court order, issued on Thursday, came in response to a flood of individuals seeking a piece of an estate some have valued at more than $ 500 million, left by Prince when he died unexpectedly in April at the age of 57, apparently without a will.
The focus of their appeal will be a Federal Court judge's ruling that vacated the court order about two weeks after the raid on Lackman's Court judge's ruling that vacated the court order about two weeks after the raid on Lackman's court order about two weeks after the raid on Lackman's home.
The Republican presidential frontrunner on Wednesday night called the electronics giant «disgraceful» for rejecting a court order to give encrypted data from one of the San Bernardino attackers» phones to the FBI.
When lenders who issues deeds of trust want to foreclose on a home, they are not required to get a court order to do so.
But that kind of targeted tracking would not require broad access to records of people unconnected to terror suspects and their known associates, which is hinted at by both Sen. Udall's remarks and the high rate of modifications imposed on Section 215 orders by the FISA court.
On April 4, 2016, Sanjel obtained a Court Order from the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta under the Companies» Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) in Canada.
A lender who issues a deed of trust is not required to get a court order to foreclose on a home.
A preliminary injunction against Zillow and one of its chief execs, Errol Samuelson, is set to lift on March 22, but a Washington state Superior Court judge has ordered an investigation into whether Zillow and Samuelson should be held in contempt for violating the injunction.
HOUSTON, April 25 An international arbitration court has ordered Venezuela's state - run oil company PDVSA to pay ConocoPhillips $ 2.04 billion for early dissolution of two joint ventures for producing oil in the OPEC - member country, the U.S. firm said on Wednesday.
The judge said in a 91 - page decision that, while the Army Corps substantially complied with the National Environmental Policy Act, federal permits issued for the pipeline violated the law in some respects, saying in a court order the Corps did not «adequately consider the impacts of an oil spill on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental justice.»
Instead, the one - paragraph order, signed by a Fisa court judge in 2010, declares that the procedures submitted by the attorney general on behalf of the NSA are consistent with US law and the fourth amendment.
On March 6, 2018, Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered a preliminary injunction order against defendants Patrick K. McDonnell and CabbageTech Corp, also known as Coin Drop Markets (CDM).
The Italian exchange received an order from the Court of Florence on Tuesday to cease operations immediately.
Broward Circuit Judge Jack Tuter also signed orders against a Weston man accused of stalking his ex-girlfriend's daughter and a Pembroke Park woman who drove her car into a BSO station in an alleged attempt to set it on fire, according to court records.
The court considered there was a real issue as to whether or not there are presently any validly appointed directors of YAC and ordered the issue be determined as soon as possible at a trial to be held on 22 February in the Supreme Ccourt considered there was a real issue as to whether or not there are presently any validly appointed directors of YAC and ordered the issue be determined as soon as possible at a trial to be held on 22 February in the Supreme CourtCourt.
Two additional stockholder derivative lawsuits, Pifko v. Babbio, et al., filed on September 19, 2006, and Gross v. Babbio, et al., filed on November 21, 2006, were filed in Chancery Court, County of New Castle, Delaware; both seek to recover damages for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty and to obtain an order instructing the defendants to refrain from further breaches of fiduciary duty and to implement corrective measures that will prevent future occurrences of the alleged breaches of fiduciary duty.
On April 13, 2016, the Court issued an order (the «Meeting Order»), accepting the filing of the Amended and Restated Plan of Compromise and Arrangeorder (the «Meeting Order»), accepting the filing of the Amended and Restated Plan of Compromise and ArrangeOrder»), accepting the filing of the Amended and Restated Plan of Compromise and Arrangement.
On July 31, the Director of National Intelligence released a heavily redacted version of the FISA court's «primary order» compelling telecoms to turn over metadata.
On March 14, 2016 the Court issued an order, amending and extending the Notice of Objection Bar Date (as set out in the Claims Procedure Order dated June 11, 2015) to 28 days following April 15, 2016, or such later date as the Court may Oorder, amending and extending the Notice of Objection Bar Date (as set out in the Claims Procedure Order dated June 11, 2015) to 28 days following April 15, 2016, or such later date as the Court may OOrder dated June 11, 2015) to 28 days following April 15, 2016, or such later date as the Court may OrderOrder.
Please be advised that in accordance with the Order Amending the Claims Procedure Order granted October 30, 2015, if the Monitor intends to revise or reject a Claim, the Monitor shall notify the Claimant who has delivered such Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim, as applicable, that such Claim has been revised or rejected and the reasons therefor, by sending a Notice of Revision or Disallowance by no later than December 15, 2015, unless otherwise ordered by the Court on application by the Monitor.
On the same date, the Court also issued an order (the «Employee Representative Order») approving the appointment of certain individuals as representatives of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative Order) in the insolvency proceedorder (the «Employee Representative Order») approving the appointment of certain individuals as representatives of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative Order) in the insolvency proceedOrder») approving the appointment of certain individuals as representatives of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative Order) in the insolvency proceedOrder) in the insolvency proceedings.
But the court order that was published that showed the — it showed the serial number at the top, on the top right side of it.
On December 8, 2015, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including February 12, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including February 12, Order) until and including February 12, 2016.
On September 26, 2016, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including January 20, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including January 20, Order) until and including January 20, 2017.
On March 14, 2016, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including April 15, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including April 15, Order) until and including April 15, 2016.
On February 12, 2016, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including March 15, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including March 15, Order) until and including March 15, 2016.
April 26, 2017 On April 26, 2017, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including September 29, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including September 29, Order) until and including September 29, 2017.
On the same day, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List)(the «Court») granted an order (the «Initial Order»), which, among other things, provides for a stay of proceedings until February 13, 2015 (the «Stay Period&raqorder (the «Initial Order»), which, among other things, provides for a stay of proceedings until February 13, 2015 (the «Stay Period&raqOrder»), which, among other things, provides for a stay of proceedings until February 13, 2015 (the «Stay Period»).
On June 2, 2016, the Court issued an order (the «Sanction and Vesting Order»), sanctioning and approving the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Compromise and Arrangement dated May 19, order (the «Sanction and Vesting Order»), sanctioning and approving the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Compromise and Arrangement dated May 19, Order»), sanctioning and approving the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Compromise and Arrangement dated May 19, 2016.
On June 11, 2015, the Court issued an order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, 201On June 11, 2015, the Court issued an order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, 201on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, 201on August 31, 2015.
On August 14, 2015, the Court issued an order extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including November 16, order extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including November 16, Order) until and including November 16, 2015.
January 25, 2018 On January 25, 2018, the Court issued an order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including May 15, order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including May 15, Order) until and including May 15, 2018.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z