The Federal Executive Council thereafter endorsed the proscription after which it was published in the Federal Government's gazette
on the order of the court.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 21, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 10, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED.
Not exact matches
Gawker began a
court -
ordered auction
of its business
on Monday after losing a $ 140 - million
court case earlier this year involving former wrestler Hulk Hogan, who sued Gawker for invasion
of privacy after it published a clip from a sex tape he made with a friend's wife.
The group
of businesses — which also includes Twitter, Uber, and SpaceX — said the new
order would inflict «substantial harm
on U.S. companies, their employees, and the entire country,» in a brief filed in the U.S. District
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Still, experts said those comments were likely to hurt the government's case in the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals, which heard arguments
on Tuesday night over whether the TRO should be upheld while the
order's legality is established.
Apple (aapl) is fighting a
court order obtained by the FBI last month that requires the company to write new software to disable the passcode protections
on a work iPhone used by Rizwan Farook, one
of the two shooters in a December rampage that left 14 dead and 22 wounded.
If Trump's past comments about a ban
on Muslims don't weigh heavily
on the judges» perceptions
of his motivations, the speed with which the
order was drafted and rolled out — largely bypassing the government's traditional national - security apparatus — and the extent to which it has been altered since may give
courts reason enough to wonder whether an «ulterior motive» was at play, Stock said.
In a complaint filed
on Tuesday in San Francisco, Jeffrey Berns asked the
court to quash a subpoena that
orders Coinbase to turn over the names and account information
of all
of its customers.
The presidential
order imposed a temporary ban
on travelers from seven predominantly Muslim countries, but a federal judge has barred enforcement
of the
order while the
court considers a challenge brought by Washington state.
The case being led by Texas and filed at the Federal
Court in the Southern District
of Texas said the executive
order announced by Obama last month violated constitutional limits
on presidential powers.
A majority
of the judges
on a federal appeals
court seemed skeptical
of the government's defense for President Donald Trump's executive
order restricting travel, during courtroom arguments Monday.
DUBLIN, May 2 - Ireland's High
Court refused a request by Facebook to delay a referral of a landmark privacy case to Europe's top court on Wednesday, ordering its immediate refe
Court refused a request by Facebook to delay a referral
of a landmark privacy case to Europe's top
court on Wednesday, ordering its immediate refe
court on Wednesday,
ordering its immediate referral.
On March 1, 2017, a
court ordered the liquidation
of Penn Treaty which triggered assessments from the state guaranty associations.
On Sunday and Monday, 127 Bay Area companies filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit stating their opposition against the president's executive order on immigratio
On Sunday and Monday, 127 Bay Area companies filed an amicus brief with the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit stating their opposition against the president's executive
order on immigratio
on immigration.
The legislative push come against a backdrop
of the expanding legalization
of same - sex marriage, which is now allowed in 36 states and in limbo in a 37th — Alabama, where there have been contradicting state and federal
court orders on the matter.
The
court order, issued
on Thursday, came in response to a flood
of individuals seeking a piece
of an estate some have valued at more than $ 500 million, left by Prince when he died unexpectedly in April at the age
of 57, apparently without a will.
The focus
of their appeal will be a Federal
Court judge's ruling that vacated the court order about two weeks after the raid on Lackman's
Court judge's ruling that vacated the
court order about two weeks after the raid on Lackman's
court order about two weeks after the raid
on Lackman's home.
The Republican presidential frontrunner
on Wednesday night called the electronics giant «disgraceful» for rejecting a
court order to give encrypted data from one
of the San Bernardino attackers» phones to the FBI.
When lenders who issues deeds
of trust want to foreclose
on a home, they are not required to get a
court order to do so.
But that kind
of targeted tracking would not require broad access to records
of people unconnected to terror suspects and their known associates, which is hinted at by both Sen. Udall's remarks and the high rate
of modifications imposed
on Section 215
orders by the FISA
court.
On April 4, 2016, Sanjel obtained a
Court Order from the
Court of Queen's Bench
of Alberta under the Companies» Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) in Canada.
A lender who issues a deed
of trust is not required to get a
court order to foreclose
on a home.
A preliminary injunction against Zillow and one
of its chief execs, Errol Samuelson, is set to lift
on March 22, but a Washington state Superior
Court judge has
ordered an investigation into whether Zillow and Samuelson should be held in contempt for violating the injunction.
HOUSTON, April 25 An international arbitration
court has
ordered Venezuela's state - run oil company PDVSA to pay ConocoPhillips $ 2.04 billion for early dissolution
of two joint ventures for producing oil in the OPEC - member country, the U.S. firm said
on Wednesday.
The judge said in a 91 - page decision that, while the Army Corps substantially complied with the National Environmental Policy Act, federal permits issued for the pipeline violated the law in some respects, saying in a
court order the Corps did not «adequately consider the impacts
of an oil spill
on fishing rights, hunting rights, or environmental justice.»
Instead, the one - paragraph
order, signed by a Fisa
court judge in 2010, declares that the procedures submitted by the attorney general
on behalf
of the NSA are consistent with US law and the fourth amendment.
On March 6, 2018, Judge Jack B. Weinstein
of the US District
Court for the Eastern District
of New York entered a preliminary injunction
order against defendants Patrick K. McDonnell and CabbageTech Corp, also known as Coin Drop Markets (CDM).
The Italian exchange received an
order from the
Court of Florence
on Tuesday to cease operations immediately.
Broward Circuit Judge Jack Tuter also signed
orders against a Weston man accused
of stalking his ex-girlfriend's daughter and a Pembroke Park woman who drove her car into a BSO station in an alleged attempt to set it
on fire, according to
court records.
The
court considered there was a real issue as to whether or not there are presently any validly appointed directors of YAC and ordered the issue be determined as soon as possible at a trial to be held on 22 February in the Supreme C
court considered there was a real issue as to whether or not there are presently any validly appointed directors
of YAC and
ordered the issue be determined as soon as possible at a trial to be held
on 22 February in the Supreme
CourtCourt.
Two additional stockholder derivative lawsuits, Pifko v. Babbio, et al., filed
on September 19, 2006, and Gross v. Babbio, et al., filed
on November 21, 2006, were filed in Chancery
Court, County
of New Castle, Delaware; both seek to recover damages for alleged breaches
of fiduciary duty and to obtain an
order instructing the defendants to refrain from further breaches
of fiduciary duty and to implement corrective measures that will prevent future occurrences
of the alleged breaches
of fiduciary duty.
On April 13, 2016, the
Court issued an
order (the «Meeting Order»), accepting the filing of the Amended and Restated Plan of Compromise and Arrange
order (the «Meeting
Order»), accepting the filing of the Amended and Restated Plan of Compromise and Arrange
Order»), accepting the filing
of the Amended and Restated Plan
of Compromise and Arrangement.
On July 31, the Director
of National Intelligence released a heavily redacted version
of the FISA
court's «primary
order» compelling telecoms to turn over metadata.
On March 14, 2016 the
Court issued an
order, amending and extending the Notice of Objection Bar Date (as set out in the Claims Procedure Order dated June 11, 2015) to 28 days following April 15, 2016, or such later date as the Court may O
order, amending and extending the Notice
of Objection Bar Date (as set out in the Claims Procedure
Order dated June 11, 2015) to 28 days following April 15, 2016, or such later date as the Court may O
Order dated June 11, 2015) to 28 days following April 15, 2016, or such later date as the
Court may
OrderOrder.
Please be advised that in accordance with the
Order Amending the Claims Procedure
Order granted October 30, 2015, if the Monitor intends to revise or reject a Claim, the Monitor shall notify the Claimant who has delivered such Proof
of Claim or D&O Proof
of Claim, as applicable, that such Claim has been revised or rejected and the reasons therefor, by sending a Notice
of Revision or Disallowance by no later than December 15, 2015, unless otherwise
ordered by the
Court on application by the Monitor.
On the same date, the
Court also issued an
order (the «Employee Representative Order») approving the appointment of certain individuals as representatives of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative Order) in the insolvency proceed
order (the «Employee Representative
Order») approving the appointment of certain individuals as representatives of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative Order) in the insolvency proceed
Order») approving the appointment
of certain individuals as representatives
of the Target Employees (as defined in the Employee Representative
Order) in the insolvency proceed
Order) in the insolvency proceedings.
But the
court order that was published that showed the — it showed the serial number at the top,
on the top right side
of it.
On December 8, 2015, the
Court issued an
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including February 12,
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17
of the Initial
Order) until and including February 12,
Order) until and including February 12, 2016.
On September 26, 2016, the
Court issued an
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including January 20,
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17
of the Initial
Order) until and including January 20,
Order) until and including January 20, 2017.
On March 14, 2016, the
Court issued an
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including April 15,
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17
of the Initial
Order) until and including April 15,
Order) until and including April 15, 2016.
On February 12, 2016, the
Court issued an
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including March 15,
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17
of the Initial
Order) until and including March 15,
Order) until and including March 15, 2016.
April 26, 2017
On April 26, 2017, the
Court issued an
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including September 29,
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17
of the Initial
Order) until and including September 29,
Order) until and including September 29, 2017.
On the same day, the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice (Commercial List)(the «
Court») granted an
order (the «Initial Order»), which, among other things, provides for a stay of proceedings until February 13, 2015 (the «Stay Period&raq
order (the «Initial
Order»), which, among other things, provides for a stay of proceedings until February 13, 2015 (the «Stay Period&raq
Order»), which, among other things, provides for a stay
of proceedings until February 13, 2015 (the «Stay Period»).
On June 2, 2016, the
Court issued an
order (the «Sanction and Vesting Order»), sanctioning and approving the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Compromise and Arrangement dated May 19,
order (the «Sanction and Vesting
Order»), sanctioning and approving the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan of Compromise and Arrangement dated May 19,
Order»), sanctioning and approving the Second Amended and Restated Joint Plan
of Compromise and Arrangement dated May 19, 2016.
On June 11, 2015, the Court issued an order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, 201
On June 11, 2015, the
Court issued an
order (the «Claims Procedure Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31,
order (the «Claims Procedure
Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof of Claim or D&O Proof of Claim with the Monitor on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31,
Order») approving the claims process whereby persons who assert a Claim against the Target Canada Entities must file a Proof
of Claim or D&O Proof
of Claim with the Monitor
on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on August 31, 201
on or before 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time)
on August 31, 201
on August 31, 2015.
On August 14, 2015, the
Court issued an
order extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including November 16,
order extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17
of the Initial
Order) until and including November 16,
Order) until and including November 16, 2015.
January 25, 2018
On January 25, 2018, the
Court issued an
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17 of the Initial Order) until and including May 15,
order, extending the Stay Period (as defined in Paragraph 17
of the Initial
Order) until and including May 15,
Order) until and including May 15, 2018.