With all that is going on in the world, to suggest that our society today, is a free and democratic one is not
only naive, it is downright irresponsible.
Simply saying don't do it is not
only naive but fails the students
That's not
only naive, it leaves just one profiteer in the equation: publishers.
Only naive people think that bestseller writers get reviews for free, specially 1000 reviews.
Only a naive Manager will keep an unhappy player and loose him for free in the summer.
Any English translation taken of The Bible taken literally is not
only naive, but sorely incorrect.
Regarding the popular view of time as a straight line stretching backward and forward, it should be observed that it is not
only naive as Von Rad has mentioned, 32 but also quite unreal and non-evolutionary.
Not exact matches
Anyone who advocates torture shouldn't be met
only with moral condemnation, but also contemptuous jeers for being such a
naive dupe.
I have one more question, and it may be a very silly and
naive question but I have to ask — why would a gay person want to be a part of a faith that is bulging at the seems with members who consider homosexuality to be, not
only a sin, but an extremely harmful and vile sin?
Bob: «I have one more question, and it may be a very silly and
naive question but I have to ask — why would a gay person want to be a part of a faith that is bulging at the seems with members who consider homosexuality to be, not
only a sin, but an extremely harmful and vile sin?»
So all other gods are just «Imanigary False Gods» concocted by some greedy, or ignorant, or trickster, or
naive humans, this is the one and
only real GOD (of Abraham, and Moses, Jesus, David, Muhammad) now and forever!
Only fools,
naive, uniformed people ask that question.
I think it's
naive to believe there is
only one reason, but I believe what you say is one of multiple reasons.
Sorry, but it's beyond
naive to trust anything that exists
only in your head as being 100 % trustworthy.
These kinds of people will often say things like, «It's just a bunch of fables» or «It's
only for the
naive and people looking for a crutch».
For you to think this I can
only think you are either extremely
naive or cruel..
thinks, that the Tigris and the Euphrates have not a common source, that the Dead Sea had been in existence long before human beings came to live in Palestine, instead of originating in historical times, and so on... We are able to comprehend this as the
naive conception of the men of old, but we can not regard belief in the literal truth of such accounts as an essential of religious conviction... And every one who perceives the peculiar poetic charm of these old legends must feel irritated by the barbarian — for there are pious barbarians — who thinks he is putting the true value upon these narratives
only when he treats them as prose and history.
Bill is not stating anything unique... any educated person knows there is no such thing as god and that evolution has not
only driven our species up the pole of «progress», but countless others, you would be
naive to think otherwise.
It's both
naive and close - minded a notion that religion and morality are the same thing, and that
only through religion can someone have a strong and good character.
I think it's
naive to think that the church is segegrated due to race
only.
Such people (and most Jews) would consider the idea that there is one and
only one understanding of some aspect of Biblical text and both
naive and uninformed.
I am young,
only 16 so call me
naive, but for a year now I have been trying to keep up with the debates between atheists and god believing others.
We can't be so
naive as to think that the
only threat to a child's natural innocence is unethical and inappropriate sex education at school.
(17) Others are beginning to question not
only the accuracy but the honesty of such claims, even suggesting that by raising millions of dollars each year in the name of evangelism the broadcasters are perpetuating a massive fraud among well - meaning but
naive religious supporters.
But to suggest the planet is
only 5000 years old is
naive and egotistical, not to mention ignorant of all the evidence around that suggests otherwise.
haha i am
naive... thought this was going to say «
only hands required». . .
Although many will suggest that Robson has a personal vendetta of sorts aimed squarely at the Grinch who stole soccer, that doesn't make his words any less truthful... such tactics are nothing new... in the U.S.this business practice has become so common that even the players regularly use the media to manipulate public opinion (LeBron James did likewise to rally public support for himself and away from his teammate, Kyrie Irving, who has asked to be traded)... whether for contract leverage or to rally support for or against certain players, this strategy can be incredibly effective at times, but when it misses the mark it can be dangerously divisive... for a close - to - the - vest team like Arsenal to use such nefarious means to manufacture a wedge between the fans and it's best player (again), is absolutely despicable... for the sanctimonious higher - ups who demand that it's players adhere to a certain protocol regarding information deemed «in house» or else to intentionally spread «fake» news or to provide certain outlets with privileged information for such purposes is pretty low indeed... no moral high ground here, just a big club pretending to be a small club so that they can continue to pull the wool over the eyes of a dedicated, albeit somewhat
naive, fan base... so not
only does this club no give a shit about it's fans, this clearly shows that clubs primary interests aren't even soccer related... for all intent and purposes Kroenke doesn't care if we're a soccer club or a tampon factory as long as we continue to maximized his investment... stay woke people... great to see more and more people commenting on the state of the franchise... this club needs to be held accountable for it's actions
If you think United are
only going to fight for top 4 that's
naive, and to say Di Maria is a big loss just makes no sense at all as he contributed little last season.
Jeremy, if you really think Kroenke stopped taking management fees (and it was
only once, by the way) because «the AST stepped in», you must be very
naive about how the world of business works.
I
only think it is
naive to claim he has done well to not sign anyone... because the message that sends to WOBs or fence sitters is an extremely dangerous one that can easily force him out of the club when we start having a few dodgy results.
Gabby was so
naive, he forgot about the team and
only thought about his own ego with fellow brazilian Costa..
But to Herrera's
naive boys, the unusual accommodations
only heightened the adventure.
My suggestion is that if Sanchez can learn that, he has the potential to do it much better than giroud does because he is faster off the mark and can dribble.he's too honest in his running so I disagree with those that think it's the set up of the team that failed him.his movement is still a little
naive for the premier league Secondly on the left wide argument.Wenger is jamming attacking midfielder out there so as to provide cover for the defensive midfielder using two box to box battlers.it
only makes sense because we have lots of them and it can be effective if well mastered.the catch is sacrificing a winger for the the attacking midfielder.if your memory serves you well you'll remember that artetas downward spiral began when teams noticed he was the hub for our possession and started deploying their number 10 to press him.it's been working for ages and can be used on any defensive midfielder regardless of the size so You'll end up with your much cried for cavarlho, kedihra, bender, schneiderline, and every other one passing sideways and backward because of the pressure so I personally appreciate the innovative move but Again appeal to Ramsey and Wilshire to take their job more serious.
I think JA should temporarily bar people if being too negative, writing off the whole club before even transfer window arrives is not
only too negative but is also very
naive.
You saying it's fans like me who are settlers is totally pointless.In my comments I never said I was settling no didn't want change.The way you said «stupid team» and «coach out of his depths» is what I was referring to.In fact I want a change today and I'm tired of seeing thing go on like this so don't come here and pretend like you are the
only one who wants a change and think I'm part of those who settle for this.When I also see people predicting Arsenal's positions and they are so certain about it it makes me laugh and think of them as
naive.Trust me there's no wrong for a person to predict a team's position but it's
naive for a person to be certain about it and people come and quote sayings like «no one knows tomorrow».
Now it was
only his opinion and on basis of that he called Wenger arrogant and
naive.
Are you really
naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the
only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why
only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the
only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane
Not
only money mad agents either but sometimes coaches and manager who will use their power to hold back the players progress by playing him when slightly injured and not at his optimum best and by playing young,
naive but anxious to please players in the wrong position.
The
only good thing that I can take away from that performance is it highlighted that we still lacked guile in attack and we were
naive in defence.
Shame wenger
only stumbled on the benefit of coquelin so late in the season leading to us being more organised and less
naive in games.
Well, they were not saying that when they were running behind the bus after the FA Cup (won by the players and the players
ONLY) and thought that we were going to push on (
naive!).
I'll say that I agree with your analysis of why we conceded but I fear you've been a bit
naive in the assumption that football matches are
only won or lost in the key moments of the game.
Same applies to players, Jack has fantastic talent but he doesn't even get into 99 % of fans first 11's so this panic at the thought of letting him go is the
only «incredibly
naive» element.
George Graham won in Europe three years before Wenger joined, and although he (Wenger) claimed to have not seen Arsenal in the champions league a lot before he joined that's because
only the winners of their Nations league went into it and English clubs were banned for a few years, under GG we were in it once and should have been in it once more in his reign, Wenger three in his, Wenger maybe tactically
naive but his ability to pull the wool over peoples eyes is amazing.
In a freak campaign in which the majority of Leicester's roster were fit for most of the season — Jamie Vardy for example
only missed two games, it would be
naive for the Foxes to expect the same sort of fortune this time around.
Statistically, the best partnership was that of Mertesacker and Vermaelen, who conceded thrice in 4 games, yet these stats
only tell half the story, as judging a defence over the course of 4 games would be unfair and
naive.
Not
only did it expose the
naive Ujah to a storm of Cologne fan outrage, it also destabilised the Rhine club at a vital time.
I've already mentioned how
naive we are in Europe, that Wenger is
only capable of performing for 90 minutes, not 180.
Right now Im not worried about Chelsea, Utd, Spurs or anybody else, if Im honest I think if we wernt so mentally fragile and tactically
naive we would have this League wrapped up by now and Im
only worried about us.
not
naive it is what is expected at United - we always started matches with pace - luckily
only the Gooners have taken advantage of our slow start to games.