Sentences with phrase «only reason man»

So, because I'm a beautiful woman, the only reason any man wants to talk to me is because he wants to fuck me?

But to say that the only reason men are avoiding committed relationships and marriage is because women are spreading their legs and giving it up too soon (bad, women, bad!)

Not exact matches

At only $ 20, there's no reason that the Brooks Brothers tartan pocket square shouldn't be the one you reach for when the clouds roll out and Old Man Winter rears his hoary head.

Taken to its logical extreme, his research seems to argue that boards should have only female directors, but he's careful to point out that not all women score highly on complex moral reason (sometimes known as «CMR») decision - making, and some men do.

Durov is only one man though, and for political and technical reasons, his network is prone to sporadic outages.

About the only reason I know that women like to put on lavish weddings, is to get the man at least two years into debt so as to make it less likely that he will leave her if he changes his mind.

Christ limited men to only 1 reason.

All religions for obvious reason (male domination) shows extreme hatered for females with islam as the center of these haters, but christainity is only second due to strong men such as Aams, Franklin, handcock, Jefferson and Washington acting with reasoning in creating the declaration of independence that created this country.

«Well aware that the opinions and belief of men depend not on their own will, but follow involuntarily the evidence proposed to their minds; that Almighty God hath created the mind free, and manifested his supreme will that free it shall remain by making it altogether insusceptible of restraint; that all attempts to influence it by temporal punishments, or burthens, or by civil incapacitations, tend only to beget habits of hypocrisy and meanness, and are a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, who being lord both of body and mind, yet chose not to propagate it by coercions on either, as was in his Almighty power to do, but to extend it by its influence on reason alone; that the impious presumption of legislators and rulers, civil as well as ecclesiastical, who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world and through all time.»

Not only have philosophers habitually sought to justify their positions by refuting others; but we have every reason from intellectual history and the nature of man to think that this method must be followed.

One of the most common reasons for opposing same - sex marriage cited by non-affirming Christians is that only a man and woman can biologically procreate.

So then perhaps it is no poem, or at any rate not one for which any human being is responsible, nor yet mankind; ah, now I understand you, it was for this reason you called my procedure the most wretched act of plagiarism, because I did not steal from any individual, nor from the race, but from the God or, as it were, stole the God away, and though I am only an individual man, aye, even a wretched thief, blasphemously pretended to be the God.

the only reason your stopping this practice is because your man is running for office, give us real answers and not the BS hype your trying pull over America's eyes.

Only reason the so called cult is doing is because there man is getting attention for being a major player in this cult.

«All these are remedial reasons important for man but only instrumental to the specific humaneness sought by him....

The other says: Wait and see; reason will be able to answer everything; you will then be convinced that there is no God, that there is only man.

Such are the expectations of our society that for some reason a drunken man, though laughed at, is tolerated, but a drunken woman is not only laughed at but also despised.

Believe it or not, there are some gay men that never engage in anal sex for one reason or another (sometimes religious, it being the only gay sex act actually mentioned in the bible as offensive).

Most memorably of all, «If you want to know the law and nothing else, you must look at it as a bad man, who cares only for the material consequences which such knowledge enables him to predict, not as a good one, who finds his reasons for conduct, whether inside the law or outside of it, in the vaguer sanctions of conscience.»

True, in a particular case I do claim the right to be more objective, farseeing and wiser than a certain other person whose opinion I encounter, but I do this only because I attribute reason and honesty to all men, at least in principle, and hence also to myself, not because I prefer my own subjective opinions.

To the spiritual or radical Christian, the very name of Jesus not only symbolizes but also makes actually present the total union of God and man, and for that reason it likewise gives witness to a concrete reversal of history, and a dawning apocalyptic transfiguration of the cosmos.

When I saw this video of Fox News» Megyn Kelly taking on two men in a heated argument about stereotyping women, it only confirmed to me that beneath all the layers of reasoning there resides a deep - seated, gut - level emotional conviction that women must fulfill their stereotypical roles.

A man who, for some reason, feels the need perpetually to humiliate people will not find any explanation for that need in the actual attempts to humiliate others: he will only find it in the inferences which might be derived from the motives which lead him to behave in that way.

2) The only reason we as a country are divided is tgat people like you and the evangelucal right don't like a black man with a strange arab sounding name as President.

It seems the most likely scenario is that he married his sister or less likely his niece.The reasoning is that Adam and Eve lived alot longer and continued to have sons and daughters GEN5: 4 aCTS 17:26 Paul tells us that the God who made the world hath made of one blood all nations of man to dwell on all the face of the earth.Cain did nt marry to another tribe or nation as every man and women was a relative and of the same bloodline of Adam and Eve.The importance of this is that sin entered through one man Adam and is past through the bloodline so redemption is only possible through the same bloodline.So for the formula to work the human genome had to stay the same no other tribes or nations just the descendents of Adam and Eve.It also solves another riddle in that satan at various times prior to the flood and after the flood tried to contaminate the bloodline by his angels having sexual relations with the women this created a type of alien in essence and would have not been able to have been redeemed by the blood of Jesus as it wasnt fully human.This is where the giants came from and why God wanted to destroy them as they had the potential to destroy the human race as they couldnt be redeemed by the blood of Jesus.Interesting?

When Paul says that the «soulish» man can not receive the things of the Spirit of God, he is simply saying that the soul of a person, by itself, with only imagination, memory, reason, and emotions to guide it, can not grasp spiritual truth.

The revealed account of creation mentions only the «dust of the earth» as material cause; there is no certain scientific doctrine to the contrary; therefore there is no reason to abandon a «literal» interpretation of Genesis, all the more so as the history of the theory of evolution shows that this tends to be regarded in a radically materialistic way as a complete explanation of man's origin, and so involves theses which are certainly heretical.

The only reason CNN gives so much press to these kinds of nuts is to marginalize those who have principled reasons for believing that marriage is between a man and a woman.

The primary reason for my attempt to relate the resurrection to Jesus simply as a man is soteriological: if it is only Jesus» divinity which explains and guarantees...

Another influential sixth - century monastic, Caesarea of Arles, wrote, «The souls not only of nuns, but of all men and women, if they will guard chastity of the body and virginity of the heart... should not doubt that they are spouses of Christ,» and he put forward the spiritual marriage to Jesus in Heaven as reason for remaining celibate while on earth.

Hence, faith differs from the intention of philosophy and the natural sciences in its use of reason only in that the datum on which it rests in its entirety is not acknowledged as such by all men.

In this sense, and only this sense, I am a deeply religious man... I am satisfied with the mystery of life's eternity and with a knowledge, a sense, of the marvelous structure of existence — as well as the humble attempt to understand even a tiny portion of the Reason that manifests itself in nature.»

A man becomes an individual «I,» rather than a peculiar mixture of universal forces or principles, only as he inwardly transcends both emotion and reason, accepting responsibility for the outcome of the struggle between them.

Man, with his reason, can only deal with phenomena, and he ought to be conscious of the limitations which this places on all his investigations.

That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence, and therefore all men have an equal, natural and unalienable right to the free exercise of religion according to the dictates of conscience, and that no particular religious sect or society ought to be favored or established by law in preferrence [sic] to others.

It is only the sexual union of a man and a woman that has the potential to produce new life and, for this reason, it is the only sexual union approved of by the Catholic Church.

But the only reason people looked upon Jesus in this way at that time (few look upon Jesus in that way now), is because Jesus had incarnated Himself among men and had taken the sin of the world upon Himself so that He died among the wicked (Isa 53:9), bearing upon Himself the curse of the cross, and even crying out that He had been forsaken by God (Matt 27:46).

Only in the contemporary period have reflective men and women begun to see through the perverse uses of reason and to test its deliverances in the light of ideology - critique and transformative praxis.

I don't know if that qualifies as true morality if the only reason you don't commit evil deeds agaist your fellow man is because you might get caught and punished.

Hartshorne challenges the critics of the argument to construct a more plausible semantics that will work not only for a criticism of Anselm's reasoning, but also for ordinary purposes of understanding possibility (Man's 301).7

Idealism will not admit, however, that man transcends his reason; consequently, it equates the individual self with the «Absolute» and loses individuality in the universal spirit.11 The self then becomes only an aspect of the universal mind, the cosmic reason.

Modern man views himself in only one dimension (either nature or reason) and attempts to derive evil from some specific historical source such as religion (Holbach and Helvetius), autocratic government (Hobbes, Locke, and Adam Smith), or economic organization (Marx).

Only 1 reason this «bishop» (and I use that term VERY loosely) settled... evil likes to stay in the dark, where their deeds can not be seen by men.

Jews spread from Africa & Middle East to Europe, now you can't tell a Jew from a White Man and because of the European Conquest by Alexander The Great, The Greeks, The Romans, French, Italians, English and German Armies into Egypt is the reason why many people only see light or white looking Egyptians

The logic of testimony is thus framed by rhetoric considered as «counterpart» (antistrophos) of dialectic.5 But dialectic is the logic of only probable reasoning, that is, the majority of which contains truths of opinion agreed to by most men and most often.

Some men, for theological or moral reasons, are not only suspicious of but are negatively disposed toward some dimensions of their own physical and psychic make - up.

The «agnostic society» is a society in which every man is his own arbiter of what is «reason» or «nature», and in which the only certainties to draw from in this unending debate are scientific, positivist, facts.

The only man whose work we can trace in the synoptic tradition who ever concerns himself to remain reasonably true, in our sense of that word, to his sources is Luke, and even he does not hesitate to make very considerable changes indeed when he has theological reasons for doing so.

It is curious that the people who have been telling us for years that there are no moral truths now insist to us that the laws confining marriage to one man and one woman must not only have a moral justification — that is, reasons to establish the rightness or «justice» that «justifies» the law.

The parables disclose with what pleasure and tolerance he surveyed the broad scene of human activity: the merchant seeking pearls; the farmer sowing his fields; the real - estate man trying to buy a piece of land in which he had secret reason to believe a treasure lay buried; the dishonest secretary, who had been given notice, making friends against the evil day among his employer's debtors by reducing their obligations; the five young women sleeping with lamps burning while the bridegroom tarried and unable to attend the marriage because their sisters who had had foresight enough to bring additional oil refused to lend them any; the rich man whose guests for dinner all made excuses; the man comfortably in bed with his children who gets up at midnight to help his importunate neighbor only because he despairs of getting rid of him otherwise; the king who is out to capture a city; the man who built his house upon the sand and lost it in the first storm of wind and rain; the queer employer who pays all of his men the same wage whether they have worked the whole day or a single hour; the great lord who going to a distant land entrusts his property to his three servants and judges them by the success of their investments when he returns; the shepherd whose sheep falls into a ditch; the woman with ten pieces of silver who, losing one, lights the candle and sweeps diligently till she finds it, and makes the finding of it the occasion of a celebration in which all of her neighbors are invited to share — and how long such a list might be!