Sentences with phrase «open court press»

La Salle: Open Court Press, 1991.

One of the most explicit discussions of the matter is by Professor Hartshorne, who in a short but stimulating essay entitled «The Unity of Man and The Unity of Nature» (Included in The Logic of Perfection (Open Court Press, La Salle, Ind., 1962.)

Not exact matches

A court or police officer could legally compel you to press your finger onto your smartphone to unlock it, but if your phone is locked with a passcode, no one can legally compel you to open it, says William J. Cook, an attorney and partner at law firm Reed Smith in Chicago, who specializes in information technology, privacy, and data security.

11 See Charles Hartshorne, The Logic of Perfection (La Salle: Open Court, 1962): 245 - 246, 253, 262; Philosophers Speak of God (Chicago: University Press, 1953): 479; A Natural Theology for Our Time (La Salle: Open Court, 1967): 107, 112; Schubert Ogden, «The Meaning of Christian Hope,» Union Seminary Quarterly Review, 30 (l975): l61; «The Promise of Faith,» in The Reality of God and Other Essays (New York: Harper, 1963): 224f; John B. Cobb, Jr., A Christian Natural Theology (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1965): 63 - 70.

See for example, Hartshorne, Charles, The Logic of Perfection (La Salle, Illinois: The Open Court Publishing Company, 1973), and Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1984).

Charles Hartshorne, Reality as Social Process, The Free Press 1953, p. 142; also The Logic of Perfection, Open Court Publishing Co. 1962, chap.

Library, 1961) ~ Charles Hartshorne, The Logic of Perfection and Other Essays in Neoclassical Metaphysics (La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 1962) ~ Bernard E, Meland, The Realities of Faith: the Revolution of Cultural Forces (New York: Oxford University Press, 1962): and Daniel Day Williams, The Spirit and the Forms of Love (New York: Harper & Row, 1968).

Filed Under: Same Sex Parent, Trey Darnell Tagged With: adoption, gay adoption, gay parenting, gay parents, HRC, Human Rights Campaign, Johnson City Press, matt and trey adopt, open adoption, same - sex adoption, Supreme Court, The Next Family

Rawlings and his group of six airmen appeared before a General Court Martial presided by Col. Enningful who decided to make it an open and public trial to be covered by the press.

It appears that as ASI has made the full - court - press to acquire competitors and open new brands, the number of complaints have increased.

The section «Links to DEA Rules, DEA Press Advisory, Motion for Injunction Filed In 9th Circuit Court Of Appeals, Hemp Industry Comment Letter To DEA, Petitioners Opening Brief Filed In 9th Circuit Court Of Appeals And NAFTA Lawsuit Filed By Kenex» has a lot of very good information if you have the time to read it.

Soon after spending half a billion dollars, they were served with a law suit for an open source licence violation, resulting in bad press, lawyers» fees and, ultimately, an out of court settlement.

Canada Police officer dies after shooting in Abbotsford, B.C., Canadian Press Cut down on court delays by supporting victims of crime: ombudsman, Canadian Press Inquiry into missing, murdered Indigenous women opens hearings in Edmonton, Canadian Press

When the Court building opened, the Court's opinions were transmitted to the press office via pneumatic tubes.

Critics, in turn, have argued that this presumption is an indispensable element to the practical operation of the open court principle, insofar as it relieves judges, in the absence of countervailing evidence, of the onerous task of having to vet or screen the integrity of the press when presiding in full view of the media.

The team has also been involved in a number of important «open justice» challenges to facilitate press reporting of the courts, including leading a group of five media organisations in successfully challenging an arrangement where the former head of the Financial Services Authority would otherwise have given evidence in private in the Lloyds Bank shareholder litigation.

The open court principle upholds the Constitutional rights of freedom of expression and freedom of the press.

Though family proceedings are usually heard in private, there is the possibility that your case will be heard in open court, and the parties are able to speak to the press provided they do not breach certain reporting restrictions.

The strong presumption in favour of open court proceedings (and therefore against anonymity of litigation participants) has recently been re-emphasized by the Supreme Court in A.B. v. Bragg Communications Inc., 2012 SCC 46: ``... the critical importance of the open court principle and a free press has been tenaciously embedded in the jurisprudence and need not be further revisited here.&rcourt proceedings (and therefore against anonymity of litigation participants) has recently been re-emphasized by the Supreme Court in A.B. v. Bragg Communications Inc., 2012 SCC 46: ``... the critical importance of the open court principle and a free press has been tenaciously embedded in the jurisprudence and need not be further revisited here.&rCourt in A.B. v. Bragg Communications Inc., 2012 SCC 46: ``... the critical importance of the open court principle and a free press has been tenaciously embedded in the jurisprudence and need not be further revisited here.&rcourt principle and a free press has been tenaciously embedded in the jurisprudence and need not be further revisited here.»

Two people accused of plotting to open fire on people in Halifax mall get court date, Canadian Press

Where matters are dealt with in either the county court or the High Court, they are protected from public scrutiny yet they become open to both public and press — subject to reporting restrictions at judicial discretion — should they reach either the Court of Appeal or House of Lcourt or the High Court, they are protected from public scrutiny yet they become open to both public and press — subject to reporting restrictions at judicial discretion — should they reach either the Court of Appeal or House of LCourt, they are protected from public scrutiny yet they become open to both public and press — subject to reporting restrictions at judicial discretion — should they reach either the Court of Appeal or House of LCourt of Appeal or House of Lords.