Philadelphia (CNN)-
Opening arguments started Monday in the first case in which a Roman Catholic archdiocese official is accused of covering up evidence of suspected sexual abuse of children.
Not exact matches
I think when you
start an
argument with «my religion / God / belief system is the only one» you
open yourself up to some comments that may try to point you towards the fact that all religions have their faults.
It must try to earn leadership through
argument in
open debate with others — including trade unions, religious groups, community organising initiatives and anti-cuts campaigners.It is encouraging to see that Labour is
starting to grapple with the need for serious economic reform.
The moment you
open your mouth to attack them is how every
argument starts.
Then we come to a deleted scenes reel (9:47), which
starts with flashy alternate
opening titles and proceeds to include an extended Stephen and Lana
argument, a teenaged Stephen breaking into his father's house, adult Stephen
opening up to what sounds like a therapist but ends up being a kinky lover, getting whipped by another lady we can assume is a prostitute, and boxing in some kind of dreamlike bit.
Of all the
arguments you can have about art, ones that
start «I hate modern art...» or «old art is boring...» are the least likely to
open up new ways of viewing it.
I would like to see more
open discussion about the Hartwell paper analysis, and other nuanced analysis — but to repeat one last time: Categorizing any
arguments for even strong carbon taxes as «Marxist» does not seem to me like a good
starting point (as would categorizing the Hartwell paper as «denialist.»
Although you do not want your reply brief to be a mere reiteration of your initial brief
arguments, you almost always will want to
start with a quick recap of the
arguments advanced in your initial brief — preferably a single
opening paragraph before you begin your reply.