Not exact matches
In my
opinion, a better use
of time and effort would have been the regulation
of tax preparers who in most immigrant communities engage in the
unauthorized practice of law.
The market already has computerized legal services being provided by Legal Zoom and Rocket Lawyer and so far those companies have skated through the
unauthorized practice of law and in my
opinion rightfully but that's a different question.
«A lawyer may ethically outsource legal support services overseas to a non-lawyer if the lawyer (a) rigorously supervises the non-lawyer, so as to avoid aiding the non-lawyer in the
unauthorized practice of law and to ensure that the non-lawyer's work contributes to the lawyer's competent representation
of the client; (b) preserves the client's confidences and secrets when outsourcing; (c) under the circumstances described in this
Opinion, avoids conflicts
of interest when outsourcing; (d) bills for outsourcing appropriately; and (e) under the circumstances described in this
Opinion, obtains the client's informed advance consent to outsourcing.»
More recently, the topic has been put to rest, most notably in the US, where there have been numerous State Bar Association
opinions stating that (subject to certain conditions) LPO is not the
unauthorized practice of law.