Sentences with phrase «opinions of people seem»

Not exact matches

OPINION: As promising as it sounds, the prospect of non-stop flights from Perth to London might not be the success some people seem to believe.

«It seems to imply in his mind four hikes are possible, but people could disagree with him and that could just be his opinion,» said John Briggs, head of strategy at NatWest Markets.

But it's always puzzled me that no matter how apathetic people are about politics, international news, or even the general artistic climate of the country, they always seem to have an opinion about music.

Seems like a lot of trouble to go to for people that have no more power than sharing an opinion.

Additional reasons might be given for The United Methodist Church to rid itself of a commitment to abortion rights: the increasing numbers of African delegates (who are, in the main, pro-life) to General Conference; the horrifyingly high abortion rates (though the annual totals are continuing to decrease) in the United States; the pro-life drift of American public opinion (which United Methodism seems to follow); the uncommon clarity of ecumenical teaching on the dignity of the human person; and the providence of God.

I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i sSeems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i sseems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...

a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance Seems like I did know the meaning.

(And I might just add that Facebook seems to have a grain of reality in it in my opinion and should not be dismissed as it sometimes is by people) Salvation is how God draws me back to the real and holds me there.

It just seems that people like Hawking ignore religion completely when a HUGE part of science is questioning all beliefs including your own which I don't think human beings do as much as they should, or respect other people's opinions.

There are a lot of things that seem weird to different people, it's all opinion when it comes to «weird.»

@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.

That seems to imply that the person offering the trip is claiming to have the only path... and is intolerant of anyone who may hold a different opinion of what to do with their weekend.

Since most people are not trained in philosophy, theology, or history, the issues may seem to be mere matters of opinion.

The mystique operates simultaneously in two directions to blur our perception of an important aspect of reality: it diminishes the general opinion of woman as a person while glorifying those few activities to which society seems determined to commit her.

I seem to remember you quoting different people in sharing some of your beliefs and opinions.

I'm speaking about the people that seem to think that a certain (name your disaster here...) happened, «because» God is (fill in your opinion of what God is mad at here...) «He's mad at the gays, he's mad at the non-believers (anyone other than a «true Christian»), etc...

What is your opinion on what «churches» actually mean from your statement, when apparently, at least according to the article... it seems to be making the need for «churches» possibly as far as a physical gathering places for people to connect of the same or similar religion or faith... «obsolete.»

In this context, the tragedy of Oliver North is that the opinions, thoughts and feelings of the people and their elected representatives concerning aid to the contras did not matter; what seemed to matter, in an unabashed exercise of unilateral power, was the provision of such aid, by whatever means, in the name of the national interest, patriotism, and fighting communism, by people who in their actions were claiming they knew what was best for the United States.

Carlos, It's a shame that you don't seem to think that people are allowed to express an opinion without accusing them of being «bought».

I don't know what you think of the LA Dodger brass, most people around here seem to think they are pretty enlightened... I would be very interested in your opinion (at the time) when the Dodgers laid out the 68 million for Olivera?

Some people seem to be of the opinion that professional basketball players can not be trusted to do their jobs without a coach constantly intervening to drag a marker across a whiteboard.

It's a shame really how people are so plastic over here.We seem to change our views so easily.Why can't people just make up their minds?It's like people don't have stance.As I've been saying and will keep saying we have many good players but as good as they are they're overrated.We've just compromised as a club.There are problems in every single role in the team, from defence to attack.Yet these problems will constantly be ignored.Some players are cleary not good enough but say it and the stats lovers will come out.The main problem wrong with the team is the centre.The other problem is Wenger and his misuse of players.I for one don't really rate Ramsey - Xhaka partnership in a sense that it's defensively weak with Xhaka not good enough defensively and Ramsey very inconsistent.The only player excellent defensively in the centre in Arsenal's team is Coquelin and I think he should be playing though many won'tsee why.Look how easily the balls went through the midfield.Coquelin should be partnered with another CM in our current team.People shouldn't deceive themselves Xhaka that Xhaka isn't a DM.He's just not good defensively admit it.We need a DM more than a CM in my opinion or a hybrid like Sanches or Jankto.

I see more AOB posts when compared to AKB though, these are posts made by people who was willing to share them and hope to add a thought to fellow Arsenal fans... well at least I think K seems to be pure Anti-Wenger and refuses to read anything other than what follows his opinion and that bugs me BUT isn't that evidence that Admin isn't sucking the cream out of Wengers «eclair»?

it seems even everton and tottenham are better than us people here would say coleman is better than bellerin stones is better than mertz baines better than monreal mccarthy better than coquelin barkley better than ramsey lukaku better than giroud those are six players so that means everton better than arsenal lloris equal to cech rose equal to monreal vertonghen better than mertz ericksen better than ozil lamela better than walcott harry kane better than giroud so 2 players equal and 4 players better thats tottenham better than arsenal its not my opinion but that of chelsea and tottenham fans on this site

However, the «word on the street» kind of information seems to be opinions, based on hunches, based on knowing what people are like or how they are inclined.

The Arsenal and Germany international star has had his fair share (or unfair in my opinion) since he came to the English Premier League from Spain's La Liga a little over three years ago, but Mesut Ozil now seems to have won over most people, with the odd exception such as the font of all football knowledge that is Michael Owen.

I think a lot of people (not you specifically - your opinions seem well reasoned) get carried away thinking we are going to buy Benzema / Cavani / Aubameyang, but of course these players were never available.

Some people seemed to be of the opinion that I don't like Toure or would like to see him go.

I'm reminded of Gove's famous «people have had enough of experts», except that clearly they haven't because they are crying out for information and clarity, but at the same time seem to have taken on - board his message that their own ignorant opinions are somehow more important than expert ones.

This degree of supporter influence seems to have gone too far, however: Royal's desire to be a «platform for the people» led French voters to see her as being blown by the winds of opinion rather than having strong convictions herself.

For example, one missing variable that could account for much of the variation is that in America there's a strong history of public opinion (albiet not perfectly) translating into policy through democratic process, while in Egypt, average people have had incredible difficulty getting public opinion into policy and a protest was one of the tools that seemed to work.

When that face is also shouting political statements we disagree with, our dislike of the person seems to color our perception of his or her political opinions as well, Mutz observes.

Finally, there's an anti-multiverse argument which I commend George for avoiding, but which is in my opinion the most persuasive one of all for most people: the parallel universes just seems too weird to be true.

I tried to find real studies that have looked into these two water claims, but only find a lot of lay people, as well as many Doctors, talking about the issue and offering their opinions, but no one seems to have a study or studies to substantiate.

You know dr. Forrester, I am surprise that holding a title of a Dr. your answer seems to come from an ignorant person with an opinion.

It seems most people struggle with weight and so should be on the low end, but for people like me who find it hard to maintain a BMI over 18.5 without a lot of fat from nuts and seeds, I found Dr. Furhman's opinion a relief (I simply could not eat more carbs than I do).

It seems to have opened up a forum where people can comment openly and honestly about their opinions of the 30 for 30 challenge, without spurring the negativity that was going on yesterday and earlier today.

Many people still seem to be of the opinion that dating and romance is a prerogative of youth.

However, plenty of people — who's opinions I respect — seemed to love it.

The findings just don't seem to reflect the boldness of the education reforms or the people whose opinions are a strong as sazeracs.

McLaughlin, though unintentionally, also seems to further the idea that being introduced to a different language - and by extension its culture - at a young age produces more open - minded individuals who don't view the «bilingual» as having an «alien way of thinking» but rather as a person having a different opinion or view.

These people seem to ignore a whole lot of facts, and selectively censor any comments or opinions that counter them, while accusing «men» of trying to censor them when they post something critical about an author's book on Goodreads or elsewhere.

It just seems that publishers and the press have both begun to care too much about the opinion of people who don't really read much.

For some, for too many, for the old me, in this great nation of ours — this grand experiment in the land of opportunity and free speech, of where every person's opinion counts, of whiners and information overload — it seems hard to be happy.

When a person says that he gives the word of honor, in my opinion, he seems to promise to keep his promise.

While most people seem to understand that we should expect the Kindle Fire 2, opinions differ when it comes to the size of this future device.

As to the outcome of the appeal, I have read both the State's appeal and GYRO's response and my opinion, having absolutely no legal background, is that I don't see that the State has much of a case; they seem to have thrown themselves on the mercy of the court and asked the judge to be «fair» to the people of New York who will have to pay the large settlement cost.

I suppose, since you seem to have alternate opinions here, that might suggest that it is in fact possible for there to be multiple opinions on a single issue, and not any of them are entirely right because the issues are often very complex and different people have different requirements.

(6) «keeping the shares as no value for as long as possible» - you can't manipulate the value of shares, they are worth what they are worth, whether or not a professional has valued them [though per my comment # 5 above, this is irrelevant]; (7) «Also a benefit of using share options» - share options seem to be irrelevant to the question and also to your own answer; (8) «talk to your investors, see what they require» - Anyone thinking of doing this should have their own pricing plan first, in order to talk to others - you wouldn't want to get 20 opinions from different people to reconcile.

In my opinion it seems in the best interest of most people to throw money into the Vanguard account, I believe they have one that starts at 1,000 but one of the better funds is 3,000 minimum.