Sentences with phrase «oral reading test»

The Slosson Oral Reading Test (SORT)(Slosson, 1963) and the Metacomprehension Strategy Index (MSI) questionnaire (Schmitt, 1990) were given to all students in the class at both the beginning and the end of the school year.

Students averaged a nearly 2.8 grade level improvement in reading measured by the Slossen Oral Reading Test (SORT).

The Slosson Oral Reading Test (SORT) was administered before instruction began and after students completed the program.

This is most apparent in the large effect sizes for Text Reading Level (d = 2.02), the Ohio Word test (d = 1.38), Concepts About Print (d = 1.10), Writing Vocabulary (d = 0.90), Hearing and Recording Sounds in Words (d = 1.06), and the Slosson Oral Reading Test - Revised (d = 0.94).

Not exact matches

You might be concerned as well if you read the following, pertaining to sodium chloride or table salt (17): «Acute oral toxicity (LD50 — the dose at which half of the tested animals die): 3,000 mg / kg [Rat].

- Vocabulary page - Puzzles / word search - J'ai, Qui a - Board game (vocabulary based)- Test and quizzes for all strands - Foldable booklet and blank template - technology links - Draw what you read - Presenting project - oral activities - worksheets to practice numbers and avoir and much more.

They were initially given oral tests, since most of them did not know how to read.

As educators, we realize that the quality of a child's education can not be measured solely by scores on standardized reading and math tests, which by their nature do not assess students» conceptual thinking, their ability to do research and to evaluate and defend ideas, their skill at written and oral expression, or their success in collaborative or teamwork settings.

http://www.nichd.nih.gov/Pages/index.aspx DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency and Retell Fluency DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) is a standardized, individually administered test of accuracy and fluency with connected text.

English Language Arts, Balanced Literacy, Creative Writing, Writing - Expository, Reading, Grammar, Spelling, Vocabulary, Specialty, Math, Applied Math, Arithmetic, Basic Operations, Fractions, Geometry, Graphing, Measurement, Numbers, Order of Operations, Science, Earth Sciences, Environment, Social Studies - History, Ancient History, World Language, Spanish, Arts & Music, Graphic Arts, Special Education, EFL - ESL - ELD, Health, Other (Specialty), ELA Test Prep, Math Test Prep, Geography, Other (Social Studies - History), Other (ELA), Life Skills, Religion, Gifted and Talented, Critical Thinking, For All Subject Areas, Literature, Classroom Management, Professional Development, Business, School Counseling, Character Education, Word Problems, Cooking, Short Stories, Writing, Oral Communication, Child Care, Reading Strategies, Writing - Essays, Holidays / Seasonal, Back to School, Thanksgiving, Christmas / Chanukah / Kwanzaa, Poetry, Autumn, Mental Math, Halloween, Winter, The New Year, Valentine's Day, Presidents» Day, Decimals, St. Patrick's Day, Easter, Spring, Place Value, Tools for Common Core, For All Subjects, Summer, Informational Text, End of Year, Phonics, Close Reading, Classroom Community

Additionally, a subsample of students was given informal inventories of their reading knowledge (consisting of lists of words to be defined and oral reading passages from the Durrell Analysis of Reading Difficultyreading knowledge (consisting of lists of words to be defined and oral reading passages from the Durrell Analysis of Reading Difficultyreading passages from the Durrell Analysis of Reading DifficultyReading Difficulty test).

http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/ch3.pdf DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency and Retell Fluency DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) is a standardized, individually administered test of accuracy and fluency with connected text.

One month before the students were administered the state test, each student read three probes from their current basal reader to determine an oral reading fluency rate.

Results support the use of oral reading fluency assessment as a valid tool for identifying students at risk of not passing the statewide reading achievement test.

The Ohio Grade 7 Reading Test scores were correlated with oral reading fluency rates to determine the extent of the relationship between the rReading Test scores were correlated with oral reading fluency rates to determine the extent of the relationship between the rreading fluency rates to determine the extent of the relationship between the results.

Significantly more reliable and valid outcomes on such tests required three - minutes of oral reading.

Expected outcomes for students — as measured by state tests — are improved reading comprehension, speaking and listening competencies, oral and written production of English, and content understanding.

Sample assessment activities include oral response to visual stimuli, oral presentations, role playing, writing tasks (email, blog, news article, creative story, advertisement), reading comprehension tasks, quizzes, unit tests, and a final exam.

For the category of word attack and word meaning, seven different types were reported, including phonics (29 %), vocabulary (22 %), sight words (19 %), tests (12 %), oral reading (9 %), spelling (5 %), and work samples (5 %).

If someone assigned students to the Wilson phonics program because of an oral reading fluency test alone, I'd have concerns.

Test data show remarkable gains — oral reading fluency, for example, rose nearly 25 points in APTT classrooms in 2009, while they rose by only 10 points in non-APTT classrooms.

The only issue should be about what approach would most likely benefit the student, and even a reliable oral reading fluency test on its own would not be adequate to make such a decision.

Unlike oral reading, which had to be tested individually and required that teachers judge the quality of responses, silent reading comprehension and rate could be tested in group settings and scored without recourse to professional judgment, (only stop watches and multiple choice questions were needed).

Achievement tests that measure oral reading, word identification, word decoding, and rote spelling yield relatively higher scores than measures of reading comprehension.

On the oral IRP appeal it was argued that the ASD result was not reliable owing to the fact that the ASD used by the officer might not have been working properly because: (a) the ASD had not been calibrated in accordance with recognized guidelines (within the required 28 days previous to its use); and (b) a properly working ASD could not have possibly had 3 test in a row that read «NO GO» (in that if insufficient air was produced on the 3rd test it should have read «VOID» and not «NO GO»).