Somewhere I've got a great article on
the Oral Torah which I think I found online.
For me, it's helpful to think of
the Oral Torah as Jewish tradition.
I read his post on
the Oral Torah.
Even before the written Talmud was written, there was the «
Oral Torah,» a tradition of interpretation which probably existed for more than a thousand years prior to its codification in the Talmud.
Anyway from Wiki A fourth point of conflict, specifically religious, involved different interpretations of the Torah and how to apply it to current Jewish life, with the Sadducees recognizing only the Written Torah and rejecting doctrines such as
the Oral Torah and the Resurrection of the Dead.
In Jewish tradition, we frequently speak in terms of «Written Torah» (the text of the Hebrew Scriptures as they have come down to us) and «
Oral Torah» (the ensuing centuries of conversations and interpretations of our sages and rabbis, which are also considered to be holy.)
The main dispute between the Pharisees and the Sadducees was over what was called the «oral Law» or «
oral Torah».
I don't think this is how it really happened, but the point of the story is that no Jewish person would ever expect a non-Jewish person to obey or observe all of the Jewish laws, either the 613 of the Torah, or the 6000 + laws of
the Oral Torah.
The pattern of his ministry with its emphasis on teaching and the reinterpretation of
the oral Torah and on healing the sick is that of an authentic rabbi.
The Pharisees believed there was another source of authority called
the oral Torah, the traditional interpretation of the scriptures that had been handed down from generation to generation, right from the time of Moses.
Not exact matches
There were many different sects with widely differing views — the Saduccees (those who believed literally in the Written Law in the
Torah and not the
Oral Law, Pharisees (who believed in both the Written and the
Oral law, the rabbinical way which is the only sect that survived and continues to this day), Essenes, Zealots, etc..
Convinced of the
Torah's Divine origin and aware that, to be decipherable, the Pentateuch must have been given with an
oral explanation, I sought the Jewish movement in possession of that ancient Mesorah.
He was a
TORAH believer and condemned TALMUDIC Judaism (The
Oral Traditions).
But try as I might, I just can't believe that the Five Books of Moses were written by J, E, P and D — the four main authors whose
oral traditions, biblical scholars say, were cobbled together to make the
Torah.
His devotion to the
Torah exhibits a knowledge of both written and
oral law (a basic definition of Pharisaism as opposed to Sadducism and Essenism), and he repeatedly affirmed the Pharisaic doctrine of the resurrection of the body and the eternal life of the soul.
My advice to this mother is to go back and study her
Torah and the
Oral Law... and then seek Hashem to find out if the Messiah has come and if He has, Who He is.