Sentences with phrase «oral argument in cases»

Oral arguments in that case are scheduled for Dec. 17.

Interesting changes though — Just before the Federal Circuit oral arguments in this case, the PTO Solicitor withdrew its support from the PTAB's original decision and provided notice that the PTO is actively reconsidering its approach to claim construction and indefiniteness.

The 9th circuit will probably hold an oral argument in this case in the next few months.

Braun's ruling points out that an attorney representing Cuomo and LG Bob Duffy did not appear for oral argument in the case, but did respond to the petition.

Oral arguments in that case were held today in state Supreme Court in Syracuse.

The Supreme Court began hearing oral arguments in the case on Tuesday morning in a session that attracted large crowds outside the court, while justices clashed inside during the proceedings.

The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday will hear oral arguments in the case of Shew vs. Malloy, a legal challenge to the key provisions of Connecticut's post-Newtown gun control legislation.

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals yesterday reheard oral arguments in the case of an Indiana college math instructor who was allegedly denied promotion and ultimately fired for being a lesbian.

Josh Dunn called in to discuss the oral arguments in this case with EdNext Editor - in - chief Marty West on the EdNext Podcast.

The U.S. Supreme Court just heard oral arguments in the case of Janus v. AFSCME, which could substantially limit public - sector union membership and financial support.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard oral arguments in the case earlier this month.

A veteran teacher suing New York state education officials over the controversial method they used to evaluate her as «ineffective» is expected to go to New York Supreme Court in Albany this week for oral arguments in a case that could affect all public school teachers in the state and even beyond.

Oral arguments in the case were heard today before Justice Donna Siwek.

Update: Non-economic Damages Case for Pet Death Last week, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Medlen v. Strickland.

On Friday, August 15, a State Supreme Court judge in Manhattan will hear oral arguments in the case of THE COMMITTEE TO SAVE COOPER UNION, INC. v.

That was the issue yesterday as the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Chambers v. United States.

He made a very strong oral argument in our case: it was an all - around top - notch performance.»

For instance, what about the obligation to scream out, «Fore!!!??» The AP reports that tomorrow, the New York Court of Appeals will hear oral argument in the case of two doctors who were playing golf together.

The supreme court heard oral arguments in the case on October 8 and is expected to rule by the end of the year.

It was Alito's first written opinion this term, Kimberly Atkins at DC Dicta notes, adding, «The decision was not entirely surprising, given the comments from the justices during oral arguments in the case.»

As discussed here, in November 2010 the New York Court of Appeals heard oral argument in the case of two doctors who were playing golf together.

In April 2011, the South Carolina Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Eileen Frances Theresa Busto Theisen v. Clifford Richard Theisen.

Leading the briefing and oral argument in a case watched nationwide, Laurie won a ruling foreclosing strict liability and negligence liability (in most circumstances) for a manufacturer that did not make or sell an injury - causing product foreseeably used with its own.

The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in both cases this morning.

As U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said during oral argument in this case, judges should be «above the fray,» and Justice Antonin Scalia's remarks were similar, to the effect that «there are things we just don't let judges do, like publish op - eds in newspapers to respond to criticism of the court's decisions.

The justices learn for the first time what their colleagues are thinking about a case during oral arguments in that case.

On April 17, 2018, the US Supreme Court is poised to hear oral arguments in the case of South Dakota v. Wayfair.

While the Supreme Court reached the result we hoped for, the court did not discuss these policy issues (it also showed little interest in the policy debate during the oral argument in the case).

EFF Legal Fellow Jamie Williams will participate in oral argument in the case...

EFF Legal Fellow Jamie Williams will participate in oral argument in the case, Facebook v. Power Ventures, set for 9:30 am on Dec. 9 before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, California.

Oral arguments in the case are expected to occur in summer 2015, Microsoft spokesperson Kathy Roeder told the E-Commerce Times.

Not exact matches

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an important pair of cases, namely Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood v. Sebelius.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a case that could have serious implications for lawsuits involving businesses overseas.

The plaintiffs emphasized in their Monday brief «the importance that the cases move expeditiously to resolution,» adding that the parties will soon submit a «joint proposed schedule for prompt summary - judgment briefing and oral argument following consolidation.»

Both sides in the Texas cases proposed on June 24 that oral arguments be heard in mid - to late - October.

The plaintiffs» motion states that in June 14 and 15 conference calls, counsel for the three sets of plaintiffs stated that they supported coordination or consolidation, «subject to the parties» agreement that these three cases will retain their separate identities, allowing each set of plaintiffs to file separate briefs, make separate oral arguments, and independently make other litigation decisions.»

On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund case, which addresses the preemptive scope of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (SLUSA).

The first oral arguments in the string of lawsuits filed against DOL's fiduciary rule were heard on Aug. 25 by Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, in the case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

In what is likely to be a heated argument over the legacy of Uber's lightning rod of a founder and former CEO, attorneys for both Travis Kalanick and one of the car - hailing company's largest investors, Benchmark Capital, will square off in the first oral argument in the month - old casIn what is likely to be a heated argument over the legacy of Uber's lightning rod of a founder and former CEO, attorneys for both Travis Kalanick and one of the car - hailing company's largest investors, Benchmark Capital, will square off in the first oral argument in the month - old casin the first oral argument in the month - old casin the month - old case.

Judge Randolph Moss, U.S. District judge for the District of Columbia, heard oral arguments on Aug. 25 in the first hearing in the case brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

Indeed, in oral arguments on Sept. 23 in the second case before Judge Daniel Crabtree in the District of Kansas, attorneys for insurer Market Synergy argued Labor failed to prove the current state - based regulation of fixed - indexed annuities is broken, and that the judge should «hit the pause» button on including them in the rule.

In March, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two appeals cases related to same - sex marriage - California's Proposition 8, which bans same - sex marriage and the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which denies federal benefits to same - sex coupleIn March, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in two appeals cases related to same - sex marriage - California's Proposition 8, which bans same - sex marriage and the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which denies federal benefits to same - sex couplein two appeals cases related to same - sex marriage - California's Proposition 8, which bans same - sex marriage and the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which denies federal benefits to same - sex couples.

Yesterday, while I was listening with students to the oral arguments in the Hosanna - Tabor case, I noticed something I hadn't caught before.

At the Center for Law and Religion Forum, my colleague Marc DeGirolami and I have recorded a podcast on last week's oral argument in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, the Contraception Mandate case.

Next Monday, March 24 — the day before oral arguments in the Hobby Lobby andConestoga Wood Products cases — the Religious Freedom Project at Georgetown University's Berkley Center will host an event, «Everybody's Business: The Legal, Economic, and Political Implications of....

(UPDATED) Supreme Court today hears oral arguments in Greece v. Galloway, historic legislative prayer case.

The U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments Wednesday in a case that tests the corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

Also at 9 a.m., parents and students from Middle Village Preparatory Charter School in Queens rally outside the Queens County Courthouse before oral arguments are heard in its case, 88 - 11 Sutphin Blvd., Queens.

During oral arguments, several justices questioned whether the federal anti-corruption law — also used in the Skelos case — was too vague and being interpreted too broadly.

The seven - member Court of Appeals heard oral arguments yesterday in two cases where a midlevel appellate court unanimously concluded last year that state oil and gas law doesn't trump the authority of local governments to control land use.