Sentences with phrase «order offence under»

«We therefore call on the police to confirm that they will prosecute under «hate crime» any individual or group who seeks to intimidate our supporters and candidates or at least under the Public Order offence under Section 4, 4A or 5 of the 1986 Public Order Act,» they added.

Not exact matches

Gavin Reid, of Green Close, Luton, was sentenced at City of Westminster magistrates court for an offence under the Public Order Act.

2.30 pm Oral Questions Ensuring effective implementation of the stalking offences under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 - Lord Kennedy of Southwark Reducing the geographic disparity in Gross Value Added per head within the UK - Lord Wigley British Academy's report «Languages: the State of the Nation» concluding that the UK will be unable to meet its aspirations for growth and global influence unless action is taken to remedy the deficit in foreign language skills - Baroness Coussins Office of Fair Trading's report on payday loans - Lord Mitchell Legislation Growth and Infrastructure Bill - Report stage (Day 2)- Baroness Hanham Orders and Regulations Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (Amendment) Order 2013 and Motion to Regret - Viscount Younger of Leckie / Lord Young of Norwood Green

The spokesman said: «Four people have been arrested for a variety of offences under the Public Order Act, 1986.

Are also some offences under act, e.g. if fail to comply with an order.

The insurer's position was based on an allegation in the pleadings that the OSPCA violated an order of the Animal Care Review Board, which is an offence under the OSPCA Act.

Under s. 36, civil plaintiffs may commence damages actions or class actions for the violation of any of the criminal offences of the act or the failure to comply with a competition tribunal or court order under theUnder s. 36, civil plaintiffs may commence damages actions or class actions for the violation of any of the criminal offences of the act or the failure to comply with a competition tribunal or court order under theunder the act.

Prior to these amendments, the criminal court could only make a restraining order under PHA 1997 where a defendant was convicted of an offence under PHA 1997, ss 2 or 4.

A person will only be guilty of an offence under this section if he was aware of the existence of the order at the time of the conduct complained of.

The court will in future have the power to impose a restraining order under PHA 1997 when convicting a defendant of any offence.

In addition to the power under s 1 to impose an unlimited fine, s 9 gives the courts a power to order an organisation convicted of the new offence to take steps to remedy the management failure leading to death.

A person can be guilty of an offence under this section when he was «aware of the existence of the order».

A DNA order can be ordered on individuals who have been convicted, discharged or found guilty as a young offender of an offence listed under «primary designated offences».

Under s. 487.051 of the Criminal Code, a judge has to make an order authorizing the taking of bodily substances for DNA tests from a person who has been convicted, discharged, or found guilty as a young offender of any offence included in the list of «primary designated offences».

In relation to the criminal cartel offence under the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002), the government set out four options for reform, all of which included the removal of the dishonesty requirement from the offence in order to make it easier to prove in court.

Breach of any of the terms of any injunction ordered under PHA 1997 by any defendant (whether named or unnamed) acting «without reasonable excuse» is potentially a criminal offence under s 3 (6).

An order, under s 19 (1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, for costs incurred as a result of an unnecessary or improper act or omission by or on behalf of a prosecutor may be made to compensate an unrepresented defendant for his own loss of time in preparing his case and attending court.

(5) If the court decides that compliance with an order issued under this Act in response to the offence warrants a less severe penalty, the court shall give reasons for that decision.

(b) an order under subsection 69 (2) of the Provincial Offences Act is in effect directing that the registration of the person be suspended and no registration be issued to the person until a fine is paid.

(a) in the case of an order prohibiting entry, there is on the land or in the place a thing that will afford evidence of an offence under this Act;

51 An appeal lies from an order or a refusal to issue an order under section 49 or 50 in the same manner as an appeal from a conviction or acquittal in respect of an offence mentioned in such section.

(b) an order under subsection 69 (2) of the Provincial Offences Act is in effect directing that the registration of the person be suspended and no registration be issued to that person until a fine is paid.

162.3 (1) On the application of the Director, the Superior Court of Justice may order that a thing seized under section 160 or 161 or under a warrant issued under the Provincial Offences Act in connection with the commission or suspected commission of an offence under this Act be forfeited to the Crown.

(b) where the inspection or search referred to in subsection (1) is under an order under section 158 of this Act or under a warrant issued under section 158 of the Provincial Offences Act and a time limit for the inspection or search is specified in the order or warrant, be effective until the expiration of that time.

(e) an order under subsection 69 (2) of the Provincial Offences Act is in effect directing that the registration of the person be suspended and that no registration be issued to that person until a fine is paid,

(b) in the case of an order prohibiting the use of, interference with, disruption of, or destruction of a thing, the thing will afford evidence of an offence under this Act; or

During the time required for the provincial officer to obtain an order under section 158 of this Act or a warrant under section 158 of the Provincial Offences Act.

If the Tenant does not vacate despite receiving a possession order, the Landlord must then instruct the Court's bailiffs to obtain possession - again, to do otherwise is an offence under the 1979 Act.

The firm recently acted in matters relating to confiscation proceedings, cash seizure, forfeiture, restraint orders, property freezing orders and civil recovery orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act and tipping off offences in accordance with National Criminal Intelligence Service «NCIS».

Our expertise includes cases dealing with investment fraud, Insider trading, Money Laundering, Pension fraud, Mortgage fraud, Bribery, commodities and currency frauds, Tax and VAT fraud, Duty fraud, False accounting, Fraudulent trading, Advance fee fraud, Corruption, Insolvency, Cartels, Missing Trader Intra-Community («MTIC») and carousel fraud, Boiler room fraud, Credit card fraud, Financial Regulatory Offences, Confiscation Orders, forfeiture and seizure of assets under the Proceeds of Crime Act or Drug Trafficking Act, police raids, Corporate Manslaughter, Disciplinary Tribunals, confiscation and forfeiture and Financial Regulatory Offences.

Like a confiscation order, a compensation order is an ancillary court order and is designed to compensate a victim for personal injury or any loss or damage that may have resulted from the offence committed by the defendant and is made in addition, or instead of, other sentencing options under section 130 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 (PCCSA).

«In any proceedings in which a court is hearing an application for an order under Part IV or V, no person shall be excused from --(a) giving evidence on any matter; or answering any question put to him in the course of his giving evidence, on the ground that doing so might incriminate him or his spouse of an offence.»

For example, it is an offence to fail to comply with an order made under the AODA, block or fail to co-operate with an inspection, intimidate, coerce, penalize, or discriminate against someone for seeking enforcement of the AODA, co-operating with an inspection or providing information as part of an inspection.

(3) Where a person is convicted of homosexuality or aggravated homosexuality under sections 2 and 3 of this Act, the court may, in addition to any sentence imposed on the offender, order that the victim of the offence be paid compensation by the offender for any physical, sexual or psychological harm caused to the victim by the offence.

If you have been criminally convicted of specific motor vehicle related offences you will in addition to any court ordered driving prohibition automatically have your driver's license suspended under the Motor Vehicle Act.

38.1 (1) If a person is in default of payment of a fine imposed upon conviction for an offence under this Act or the regulations, on the application of a prescribed person, an order may be made under subsection 69 (2) of the Provincial Offences Act directing that one or more of the licences of the person who is in default be suspended and no licence be issued to that person until the fine is paid.

«The offences cognizable by military commissions may thus be classed as follows: (1) Crimes and statutory offences cognizable by State or U.S. courts, and which would properly be tried by such courts if open and acting; (2) Violations of the laws and usages of war cognizable by military tribunals only; (3) Breaches of military orders or regulations for which offenders are not legally triable by court - martial under the Articles of War.»

Specific topics which have been covered in recent conferences include judicial ethics; interpreters; delivering reasons for judgment; assessing credibility; social media; technology and search warrants; managing a provincial offence trial; effectively communicating an oral judgment; risk assessment and indicators of lethality at bail hearings; the Youth Criminal Justice Act; eye - witness identification; conducting pre-trials; specific issues at trials of regulatory offences; fly - in - courts, residential schools; application of Gladue principles; mistrials and bias; accident reconstruction; search warrant issues; domestic violence issues; orders for examination under the Mental Health Act; child apprehension warrants under the Child and Family Services Act; evidentiary issues; discrimination and harassment in the workplace; stress management; and pre-retirement planning.

Judges can issue discretionary weapons prohibitions under Section 110 of the Criminal Code; if a listed offence is involved and an application is made, the judge can, but is not required to, make a weapons prohibition order.

Restraining orders may also include conditions for arrest upon breach of the order, and breaches are considered criminal offences under section 127 of the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C - 46, which creates the offence of disobeying a court order without lawful excuse where no other punishment is expressly provided by law.

A discretionary Order is available for things such as the replacement value of the property; the pecuniary damages incurred from harm, expenses fleeing a domestic partner; or certain expenses arising from the commission of an offence under s. 402.2 or 403.

It provides that the «record of proceedings» in a matter that results in the conviction for a criminal offence under the Act (or a failure to comply with a Tribunal order) is «prima facie» evidence of the alleged conduct in a civil action.

Offences under s. 236 are ineligible for a conditional sentence order under s. 742.1 (b) and (c), as there are mandatory minimum periods of incarceration and, when prosecuted by indictment, the maximum penalty is 14 years or life.

Offences under s. 220 (b), 249.2 and 249.3 are ineligible for a conditional sentence order under s. 742.1 (c), when prosecuted by indictment, as the maximum period of incarceration is 14 years or life.

(8) Subsection 159 (5) of the Provincial Offences Act applies, with necessary modifications, to an order made under subsection (6) or (7).

The Respondent pled guilty to possession of a loaded prohibited firearm, contrary to s. 95 (1) of the Criminal Code, and to other offences including possession of a firearm and ammunition while subject to a prohibition order, but challenged the five - year mandatory minimum sentencing regime under s. 95 (2)(a)(ii) of the Criminal Code.

The defence submitted that a cell constituted a dwelling under s 8 of the Public Order Act 1986, and accordingly the offence was not made out.

Criminal Law: Sexual Offences; Prohibition Orders R. v. K.R.J., 2014 BCCA 382 (36200) There is a publication ban in this case in the context of retrospectivity (or not) of prohibition orders for specified sexual offences against those uOffences; Prohibition Orders R. v. K.R.J., 2014 BCCA 382 (36200) There is a publication ban in this case in the context of retrospectivity (or not) of prohibition orders for specified sexual offences against those undOrders R. v. K.R.J., 2014 BCCA 382 (36200) There is a publication ban in this case in the context of retrospectivity (or not) of prohibition orders for specified sexual offences against those undorders for specified sexual offences against those uoffences against those under 16.

(ii) The matters to be dealt with are: - the aggravating and mitigating factors of the offence (not personal mitigation); - any statutory provisions relevant to the offender and the offence under consideration so that the judge is made aware of any statutory limitations on sentencing; - any relevant sentencing guidelines and guideline cases; - identifying any victim personal statement or other information available to the prosecution advocate about the impact of the offence on the victim; - where appropriate, any evidence of the impact of the offending on a community; - an indication, where applicable, of an intention to apply for any ancillary orders, such as anti-social behaviour orders and confiscation orders, and so far as possible, indicating the nature of the order to be sought.

Words spoken which amounted to part of the offence being charged — in this instance Public Order Act 1986, s 5 — did not fall to be considered under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984) Codes of Practice, para 11.13 Code C and there was no duty on the police to give the detainee an opportunity to read the police record of what was alleged to have been said and sign it as correct — or not as the case may be.