Not exact matches
Perhaps the most politically volatile coming Supreme Court case is Whole Woman's Health v. Lakey, which will decide whether dozens of
abortion clinics throughout Texas can remain open — a decision that probably will affect
other conservative states that have in recent years imposed harsh
restrictions on
abortion clinics.
Earlier this month, the Texas legislature approved a loudly - debated package of
restrictions on
abortions in the Lone Star State; among
other things, requiring
abortion clinics to bring their facilities in line with surgical standards and banning
abortions after 20 weeks.
Even many of those who favor lower taxes (or at least oppose higher taxes) and
abortion restrictions don't know the Republican Party as anything
other than a vehicle for upper - class interest group politics and white identity politics.
The cruelly ideological Reagan - era policy places
restrictions on US funding for foreign NGOs providing
abortion services, or even information about terminations or about
other reproductive health services like contraception or HIV prevention.
«It could also open the door to challenges to
other types of
abortion restrictions,» such as 24 - waiting periods or rules about informed consent, she says.
The New York
abortion - on - demand law passed in April 1970 is the most liberal with virtually no
restrictions other than that the
abortion must be performed by a licensed physician within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy.
Further, any woman who has an unwanted pregnancy while attending TWU will face an unconscionable
restriction on her autonomy in having to continue with that pregnancy or face expulsion or
other discriminatory sanction for accessing legal
abortion services.
«Arizona
abortion restrictions backed by 16
other states»: In Friday's edition of The Arizona Daily Star, Howard Fischer will have an article that begins, «Officials from 16 states are lining up behind Arizona's bid to enforce its year - old ban on
abortions at or after 20 weeks of pregnancy.»
Proponents of such
restrictions are ultimately seeking to make
abortion inaccessible for U.S. women, and so are seeking to shutter Planned Parenthood health centers and any safety - net health center providing publicly funded family planning services that additionally offers
abortions (using
other funds), or is affiliated with an
abortion provider.
With concern escalating across the country over proposed
restrictions on private health insurance coverage of
abortion included in the health care reform bill passed by the House last week, Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards joined Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D - NY) and
other women leaders in denouncing this anti-women's health amendment passed by the House.
This would also force women to travel to a health center four times for medication
abortion, given
other existing
restrictions in Arizona.
In addition to passing one of the most extreme
abortion restrictions in the nation, years of hostile policies in Texas have left tens of thousands of Texas women without access to cancer screenings, birth control, HIV tests and
other preventive care (read more HERE from the Guttmacher Institute).
Restrictions on
abortion and
other reproductive health care — including blocking access to preventive health care at Planned Parenthood — have very real consequences for women:
Moreover, the ever - increasing weight of these
restrictions may strain providers» financial and staffing resources, making it all the more difficult to offer services
other than
abortion.
Insurance options for coverage of
abortion or immediate postabortion contraception are limited by legal and administrative
restrictions — both those in force and
others perceived or misunderstood to apply — and providers are often subject to additional scrutiny, red tape or rejection because of their affiliation with
abortion care.
Eleven states (Arizona, Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wyoming) have adopted 17
other major
abortion restrictions this year.